Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 136. page

File: Lee_Kuan_Yew.jpg (20KB, 220x293px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 220x293px

No.

>>3319842
Fucking this so hard

>>3319842
Obligatory Fpbp

File: ss+(2017-08-31+at+09.02.43).png (50KB, 316x948px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 316x948px

>JUST

>>3318486
>citation needed

>>3335798
Spanish people are really good looking. I used to think American and italian girls but after meeting a spanish chick, fuck italy lol pale skin spanish girls are 11/10

>>3335798
Go back to /int/, seriously, this is so fuckign retarded

First of all, beauty is subjective (to a degree of course) so there will never be an objective answer to the question, so this thread is stupid to begin with regardless of the board

Secondly, this has NOTHING to do with /his/, there is a board exclusively for discussions about cultures/ethniticities/demographics etc and that IS /INT/

SAGE

north caucasus, lebanon and spain

>>3334615
>>Father
>>Conditional love
Not sure why you think this is necessarily the case

>>3334636
>>3334615
Well, a father will love a child within a certain level of tolerance. If a child was a serial killer, it'd be the father who'd turn him in over the mother.
Fathers also have pride, and that pride is conditional. If that child failed to live up to that, the father would be disappointed, while still loving the child.

>>3334652
Now what would happen if those two roles were reversed? What would be the psychological consequences?

>>3334537
>rationalize

>>3334553
?

This is what adherents of creeds do.

>>3333966
Delete this thread right now.

>>3333969
Fuck off /leftypol/. This is not your safe space.

>>3333966
Just go outside for once. Talk to real people. The world is a wonderful place.

>>3333919
>says the underclass retard on his computer

>>3333919
It is bad, but aristocracy itself is at fault for becoming corrupt and materialistic. Starting with the 17th century, it became normal and legal for rich commoners (read: kikes) to buy aristocratic titles, which was unheard of before.

File: littlefinger.jpg (51KB, 500x614px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 500x614px

>>3333919
No.

>>3333891
The question a frog/feel poster should ask is where his consciousness went.

>>3333891
From your brain.

>>3333891
Your brain bits bein' all squiggly and shit.

>>3333833
For one thing the document they wrote didn't say that.

File: white irish.png (769KB, 1322x558px) Image search: [Google]

769KB, 1322x558px

>>3333833
>Italians, Irish, slavs, pagans
All whites had the same legal rights in early America, from Lisbon to Moscow. The myth that the Irish or the Slavs were not considered legally white is untrue and a product of mid 20th century academia based on literal fucking cartoons.

>>3333851
perhaps under federal law but state laws could very a good deal since at the time the bill of rights only applied to the federal government.

Europeans did colonize Liberia, they were called Americans.

File: 1490655682602.jpg (131KB, 459x448px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 459x448px

>>3333774
Americans aren't European

>>3333780
This. Americans are dirty Anglo mongrels, please don't confuse them with Europeans

>>3333623
Probably the legionaries because the guns aren't that powerful specially the early ones and the conquerors weren't the tercios. I think it would be a battles minds, both were genius, Caesar as a tacticians and Cortez as an strategist, tough Caesar was a very good strategist too. I think it would be decided be who had most time to prepare, both of them would have strategies to fuck with the other, tough in a full frontal, grassland and temperate cloudy day without rain scenario, I would give it to the Romans because they had the numbers.

>>3333623
Also fun fact, if caesar it's using the X or IX legions, it would be a battle between Iberians, the X was raised in North andalucia.

>>3333623
Romans because it's like 5000 infantry vs 500 archers. Maybe shock tactics disrupt inexperienced legionaries but Rome did fine the first time they encountered war elephants.

And then Rome could have guns forever afterwards if they can extort the secrets to gunpowder from a knowledgeable POW.

/pol/ says he did

>Germany bans his theories as "Jewish science"
>(btw he stole his theories from Aryans)

??????????

>>3333606

NO, HIS IDEAS WERE PURELY JEWISH.

ease up on the cringe, walt

File: fearthestrong.jpg (95KB, 600x540px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 600x540px

You'd be a brainwashed cuckold and die of yellow fever in some distant land to enrich an aristocrat.

If you happened to be an unspooked übermensch in those days you might take advantage of some business opportunities in the colonies, after the cuckolds have cleared the way for you, though colonies only constituted a small proportion of the economy's surplus. The majority of economic activity occurred in the homeland. Leftists will tell you Europe became so powerful because they oppressed everyone as part of their sob story narrative, it wasn't, it was because of the technological revolution going on in Europe at the time which as a side-effect put them ahead of the curve in naval warfare and exploration. You'd be better off being a boring square just like today.

Each other. Seriously, they went through two world wars where the only loosers were each other. America became such a supreme global power because at the start of the 20th century it had the same chances the europeans did but did not have to suffer through two world wars.

File: 90b46abcfeeef43d0803bf5cbfbb7374.jpg (43KB, 600x315px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 600x315px

>>3333532

>>3333532
Looks like a blunt.

>>3333209
did they have a central bank owned by the Rothchilds?

>>3333217
DA JOOOOZ

File: rothschilds-supported-nazis.jpg (53KB, 403x403px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 403x403px

>>3333217
>did they have a central bank owned by the Rothchilds?

Yes. Only 3 countries don't. North Korea, Iran and Cuba. This is why the US opposes them.