What the fuck did people even do when there was over 25% unemployment and no concept of NEETbux at the time?
Would be so funny if you put, "family man" on your resume today.
>>2672131
Kek. I guess studying humanities has always been a meme
Was Joseph a cuck?
>>2671891
He was THE cuckold.
>humanities
Fuck off with your shitty thread
>>2671891
I've always said this. Whenever Christcucks try to talk about how they're the bastions of morality keeping the barbarians at bay, I point to Joseph. Jesus was literally his wife's son. The children he had with Mary did nothing of note.
Isn't World War 2 a sort of silly name, when you think about it?
> It's the world war, but again!
>>2671770
It's called the Second World War by reasonable people.
The Second World War is a much better name for it
>>2671770
Srsly your life should be so fucking empty to think of that. Oh sorry I am on 4chan
How were monarchies able to last 1000s of years but dictatorships no more than a few decades?
Aren't both of them ruled by just one popular leader?
Kingdoms: divine right of kings, hereditary, hierarchic societies.
Dictatorships: a layman is in charge, hard to connect with the country's past rulers, almost impossible to configure as a dynasty, society has already tasted democracy and liberalism.
>>2671451
>Dictatorships are relatively new, as non-monarchism only catched on after the french revolution
>Dictatorships have a tendency to self-destruct by declaring war on other nations (see hitler)
>Dictatorships run into crises when the dictator dies because there is no clear heir (see franco)
North Korea is the closest thing we have right now to a long-lasting dictatorship, and even that nation is slowly turning into a monarchy.
>>2671451
Maybe because they both existed in completely different times you fucking retard
Why is circumcision so important in the Torah? God could have came up with literally any other flesh covenant, like a brand on your chest or something. Why was his first thought "remove the extra skin on your penis"?
>>2671403
>don't masturbate
>>2671413
srly tho, who knows how this stuff gets started
americans were convinced this would prevent masturbation and later they were convinced it would be more hygienic
truth is, for the longest time, dads have been doing this to their boys because it was done to them
>>2671403
It probably did have legitimate health benefits back then
what ever happend to budenovka's and badass greatcoat's
Both sides are just a bunch of brainwashed mass of idiots.
How many threads are you gonna spam? This is why nobody likes you faggots.
>>2671393
Pol stay on pol
Stop using words like leftists they're braindead
And those are reactionaries not tankies
Why the FUCK is Russia so god damn fucking huge? How did some backwater alcoholic slavs with stone age technology 5000km away conquer so much of east Asia with such impunity? Why did the chinks or even the japs let this slide?
>>2671196
because they were well-positioned for taking over that land and because no one else gave much of a shit about it.
>stone age technology
u wot?
map projection, also frozen or bad land no one really uses
>>2671215
>>2671217
didn't the chinese have the foresight to just more a few settlers there to secure any potential resources and denying a foreign power ports right in the sea of japan?
hey /his/torians, i was wondring if any of you could help me with a problem i am having, i need to have a bibliography written in 2 days. doesnt seem that bad right? but i have never written a real essay and am horrible at researching. but i digress, my essay is a bout the atomic bombing on hiroshima and nagasaki and why they were the beginning of the cold war and not the end of world war II. so if anyone on here knows any books or articles or something i could use, that'd be great
Look up how the japs were gonna surrendered
>>2671060
>doesnt seem that bad right?
No, that seems really, really bad. What level course is this for?
>>2671206
Bump
So what do you guys think? Child Adolf would most likely be on the Autism scale huh?
Makes you wonder how many dictators could have been stopped before they created world tragedies if we knew what Autism was.
I don't see any Autistic child.
Only a future genius.
>>2671017
Everyone is on the autistic scale, that's how scales work.
He was a socially domineering orator that gathered a following throughout his life, he most certainly wasn't autistic and redditors like you regardless post these shit threads
you must go back
mostly
is this racist whitewashing or true?
Its white washing. Everyone knows that they were black.
What the fuck are you talking about
Go to Greece, look at people
They were fucking Nubian you revisionist
If the Romans had conquered Australia, could they have prevented World War 2?
le ironic
>>2671009
What are you talking about we have alternative history threads every week
>>2671020
And they are trash.
>Some say, "history is a bunch of meaningless fragments." Well, that's not what I see. History is a story, it's a narrative and it's our obligation as teachers to try to pull together all the disparate parts—to try to give the students a coherence, a core sense of the cohesiveness of history.
Thoughts?
>>2670790
>And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle! Life’s but a walking shadow, a poor player That struts and frets his hour upon the stage And then is heard no more. It is a tale Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, Signifying nothing.
I don't think history is a narrative. There are narratives within history, you can tell a story about a specific person, place or thing, but any attempt to contextualize the entirety of human experience into a singular story sounds like whig history.
>>2670804
History is a narrative if you believe in religion, or if you think history is the story of human advancement and progression
>Jesus is a son of God, therefore subordinate to God
>Jesus is same as God because, hurr durr autism
Why has Arius considered as a heretic again?
Ephesians 4:6 one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all.
Nice arguments OP. Trinitarians/Binitarians BTFO
>>2670769
>John 1:1
What does /his/ think of Glubb's The Fate of Empire and Search for Survival?
Do modern historians take his theories seriously?
His views has altered my perception of events and perhaps it might be confirmation bias but I'm seeing the signs of decadence everywhere.
people.uncw.edu/kozloffm/glubb.pdf
btw, link for his essay
>>2670740
It's nonsense strongly influenced by 19th century and its ideology. It's not even a scholarly work. There are no references, no bibliography, nothing.
Babby first cyclical hist
Are revolutions and revolts harder in the modern time than they were in the past?
>>2670721
Yeah. There is no way you can have a revolt in a first world country. It's still really hard in third world shitholes too.
Its complicated. I would say, in a nutshell, that it is definitely easier to organize movements thanks to social media and other technological developments. You can cause greater impact. Furthermore, we live in much greater comfort nowadays and so we can sustain longer protests and it helps quite a lot, at least in western countries, we have the right to do such.
However, ironically, precisely because the state doesnt directly fight movements, theres less chance of them becoming radicalized, unless, as we saw in Romania and Serbia, shits really bad. So theres a greater threshold movements have to surpass for them to become what we know from the 19th century, revolutions.
Another complicating factor is that just as technology helps movements, it helps govt too. They can much more quickly catch up and understand the situation to control it. Be it saying the right words on TV or radio, or (in cases where corruption has infected the market), monopolies on media and transports can effectively shut down any sort of public organization. Of course, those two last must be done subtly, and over the course of an extended period of time. If executed harshly, it will only feed the flames and further push the movement over the needed threshold for things to get violent.
I believe that I should mention again that my arguments have in mind the western world, which I believe is the region you are most probable living in.
>>2670728
Perhaps one could itemize the reasons as to why this may be the case?
The extremely prolific military and police forces maybe a factor, but it seems to me that'd be a non-issue, and indeed, perhaps a boon, should one garner enough of them to one's cause.
Media control in first world nations, however, is fairly insidious, with its ability to break people into smaller and more divisive factions, none of which trust one another and each fearing the other taking power, and each accusing the other of backing, what are often in reality, mutual enemies.
At least in most developed nations that seems to be the state of things - the divide and conquer efforts by the leadership, but deliberate and incidental, has created too much fragmentation for any single revolutionary movement to have much in the way of cohesion.