I don't understand why he had to take over Europe, he could have just set up colonies in Africa
>>3341377
I don't understand why /his/ sucks his manlet dick so hard.
>>3341385
Maybe because he wasn't a shill like King george the IV?
As someone from /pol/ I can assure you he's nothing like Hitler
Because pretty much all of Europe declared war on France. He couldn't take some troops off of Europe to wage war in Africa either
They looked so scared, that the Maoris thought they might taste like chicken.
They were hungry
They had read some of Marxs work and decided the Morioi were bourgeois
The English langugae owes more to this man than to Shakespeare.
>>3341327
>being the first to do something means you're the best at it
>>3341353
Never said he was better than Shakespeare you illiterate retard.
>>3341327
ye olde brap poster
Claudius was the best if not the only good emperor the Roman Empire ever had
prove me wrong
>protip you can't
>>3341118
Augsustus set up a system where even crazy people being giving dictatorial power wasnt enough to break the system. He and dioceltian are objectively the best emporers for taking broken systems and fixing them. I place Augustus higher because Dioceltians big reform arround inheritance fell apart after his death.
>>3341118
>Not making horse a consul
>>3341180
Is this the ultimate redpill?
The French Revolution was a mistake and destroyed western values.
>inb4 retarded liberals start complaining in the thread
>>3341092
Anyone with a brain knows that
Care to explain your statement?
>>3341054
>almost permanent drunkeness
>dim-witted
>fuck-ugly
>brutish and violent tendencies
Why wouldn't they be?
>>3341054
FAS
Because they were poor and catholic the eternal anglo thought it was okay to subjugate them.
Is it due to:
a) A Trojan Prince cucking an Achaean warlord?
b) Economic tension between the Aegean and Anatolia
c) Part of the mass migrations/invasions of the Sea People in the twilight of the Bronze Age
>>3341019
Number c
>>3341019
Hi Louis
Would Middle Easterners and North Africans be considered white if they werent mostly muslims?
>>3340945
i don't know. i'm arab and i'm pale as fuck, and i've seen some brown as fuck italians and spaniards that go on about how they are the proud white masterrace. also wtf the fuck how are armenians considered white when they live just a few kilometres from us in the region and are hardly a different complexion
whoever came up with the idea that southern european/meds are the same race as nords and slavs but not the same race as eastern meds was stupid, but race is a social science anyway (i.e. not a real science)
>>3340945
No, they're nothing of the sort.
>>3340945
Only when its convenient for white people
What was the most troublesome Roman province?
>>3340922
Judea obviously
>>3340922
Mesopotamia and Armenia because of the wars with the persians
>>3340922
During the republic:
Gaul, Sardinia et Corsica, Iberia
During the empire probably Judea, Britannia and Pannonia
>America is a christian count--
Why does no one ever talk about the incredible over-representation of Episcopals and Presbyterians in the US politics?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_affiliations_of_Presidents_of_the_United_States#Affiliation_totals
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Vice_Presidents_of_the_United_States_by_religious_affiliation#Affiliation_totals
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_affiliation_in_the_United_States_Senate#Compared_with_general_population
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_National_Cathedral
Meanwhile evangelicals and catholics get shafted hard.
>>3340900
>Leaders define the countries people
>>3340900
Freemasons could be argued to be pegged to Judaeo-Christian traditions.
How would you explain philosophy to a normie? Logic? Metaphysics? Ethics v Morality? Philosophy of Religion v Theology?
Also, general video/documentaries and books on philosophy welcomed here.
Wikipedia
Simple English
>>3340706
heh
Philosophy is the study of thought
Is he right, /his/?
>>3340635
I mean he is king of the Jews and America's greatest ally. How can he not be right?
no it was both the UK's and German's fault
>>3340635
Hitler and the Nazi elite (Heydrich, Himmler, Eichmann, etc) are hardly puppets of an obscure mufti. Even if the mufti made a credible case for extermination, it was still the decision and moral responsibility of the Nazi top.
And this also neglects the fact that Nazis were already exterminating Jews on a large scale (cfr. the German einsatzgruppen)
How did that country come out on top if other countries had a huge head start of centuries or even millenia?
Why is the US not a 3rd world country like all other colonies?
Large landmass, large amount of natural resources, protected on two sides by vast oceans, relatively friendly with its only two neighbors and World War 2.
>>3340634
They also all speak English, less so these days.
>>3340634
Both world wars actually.
If Europeans didn't commit suicide and tried to annihilate each other twice in just 30 fucking years, America would still be pretty powerful, but the gap between the US and other countries would be far smaller.
What's happening today is not real marxism™. Rabbi Marx wanted a society full of equal rights and peace.
What you see today is a product of right-wing capitalism not real marxism™. Great thinkers like Lenin and Karl Radek wanted a society of peace, equality and fraternity and later they were betrayed by right-wing capitalists inside their own movement.
>>3340588
>inb4 people saying pic related
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xef1GjjiVpM
>>3341487
Not an argument lol
Why was the NKVD dominated by Jews?
>When the mass killing of the Great Terror began, about a third of the high-ranking NKVD officers were Jewish by nationality.
>The representation of Jews in summer 1936 was still higher at the rank of general (fifty-four percent) and in the central apparatus of the NKVD in Moscow (sixty-four percent) and among ranking officers in Soviet Ukraine (sixty-seven percent).
Memes aside, why were Jews in control of the NKVD, while not being particularly represented in the government or in the army?
>>3340485
Dictators often use non-native minorities to supress the native majority because members of non-native minorities tend to be less emptionally attached to the members of the native majority and therefore are more willing to commit atrocities against them, especially if this native majority used to oppress these non-native minorities in the past, like the Russians used to oppress the Jews before the Soviets came to power.
That's the only non-meme answer you are likely to get.
>>3340509
*less emotionally attached
>>3340509
Interesting. But why Jews in particular? And when did the Jews come to dominate the NKVD? Was it organized by Stalin or were they always dominant in the Cheka from Lenin's times?