>read about history of ancient Vietnam
>is fascinated on how well their history was documented 2000BC
>read on how all their kings conquered land and formed a formidable foe against ancient chinese dynasties
>amazed how well documented it really was
>then get to one part
>"Vietnamese didn't make their first documents until Chinese conquest during the 6th-13th century"
>"All of Vietnam's past history is based on legends written down in the 16th century"
>"all their so called Hùng kings are just mythological beings with no historical basis"
>"Prior to any Chinese conquest, Vietnam was nothing more than a bunch of tribal farmers living by the end of the Red River"
And this is considered factual history?
Wait until you get to the part where the Chinese Nanyue kingdom is formed and is basically what paved the way for modern day Vietnam
And Vietnamese love to hate chinks for some reason despite being their bitches from day 1
>>2746786
Same goes for chicks Who claim we have a 5000 year old history !!!! When in reality there are no chink written documents until 1200 BC
>>2746786
The official "history" of Japan until ~600 AD is also bullshit.
Has there ever been an attack on Mecca or the Vatican?
>>2746763
Yes, several.
>Mecca
Wasn't there a siege or something in the 70's? A terrorist group took over Mecca and laid siege for some time, pretty rare to hear it mentioned nowadays.
>>2746763
yes, to the point that the cube was destroyed and the pilgrims were massacred and their bodies were filled inside the Holy well
still didn't stop the Hajj
Tfw the 5th best Soviet commander in WW2 is better than the best (Non-Soviet) allied commanders.
George S. Patton is better then all russian mongrel generals in history. Prove me wrong faggots
Pro tip: You can't
>>2746729
*blocks your path*
*organizes the largest expeditionary effort in history over 5,500+ km of ocean*
*organizes the second largest expeditionary effort in history at the same time*
*annihilates several German army groups and inflicts millions of casualties in only ten months with a fraction of the enemy's casualties*
>>2746777
Not counting people in Chief of staff/ more administrative roles but theres some major criticism for Marshall, recommend Fredenhall essentially because he liked the cut of his jib, who then got fucked up in kasserine.
>>2746767
Patton was pretty good but rokasov and vasilevsky had more talent in their left pinkies then George "what is combat fatigue" Patton.
We're the prophet and his companions white?
I'm asking because of reading these accounts from this source:
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/20140428192426-47009099-how-would-sahabah-look-by-their-physical-appearances
Thanks
Like your typical arab nobility coming from the Hejaz would look like, light skinned but not caucausoid white.
>>2746713
Did Muhammad care about race as much as his followers would?
>>2746784
But most of the prominent Arabs moved and died in the sham, so why would the Hejaz portray what Arabs looked like.
>>2746670
CHOP
>>2747069
MY
HEAD
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQdDnbXXn20
Was the old man in the right, /hist/?
>>2746648
Yes from his perspective but it doesn't prove that every Wehrmacht soldier was innocent of the crimes committed by the Nazis.
>the Soviets didn't follow the Geneva convention
>war has its own rules
>germany attacks soviet union after signing a non-aggression pact
>their attack leads to soviet union taking over eastern europe
>""""""""""""""defending""""""""""""" europe from bolshevism
If you agree God is the Creator, tgen must believe he is the Creator in essence, or not.
If you say he is in essence the Creator, then you are saying he could be nothing else.
If you say he is the Creator, but not in essence, then you must acknowledge the essence-energies distinction, as did the Holy Fathers: https://www.google.com/amp/s/energeticprocession.wordpress.com/2008/01/20/essence-and-energies-in-the-fathers/amp/
What?
>>2746595
So what's your point/question?
>send communist revolutionaries (literally vladimir fucking lenin) to russia
>complain 10 years later about "aggressive bolshevik neighbor"
what is wrong with these people
>>2746586
German autism
>>2746586
>Krauts
>People
choose one
>>2746586
afaik it was planned that the commies would make peace with the Germans, so they could focus on France and Britain, hoping to quickly end the war. Afterwards they'd just try to further destroy the commies.
What went wrong?
>>2746577
Belgium not learning
The French were too racist and xenophobic and not sufficiently open towards their German neighbours.
t. Emmanuel Macron
>>2746577
Basically French didn't want to give Belgians the impression they were abandoning them
That and French are shit at war
What was the Greek opinion of Chandragupta Maurya/Sandrocottus and of Hindu civilization?
Beautiful concubines.
Is this a serious answer? I was looking at some old resources and I didn't find anything like that. Am I being r-r-rused?
>t. bad at english
>mfw Australia could have had a revolution in 1880
>>2746449
No it couldn't have. The Governor of Victoria at the time was already considered pretty far left with his policies and no one took his crying about muh irish and muh poor working class! seriously.
>>2746463
He had a 10k strong army
>>2746449
>1880
Nigga what?
Is it true that it was a generation of unmarried young men (aka Incels) to overthrow the Senate and establish the Empire?
I heard this thing but struggling to find actual sources.
>>2746377
Pompey, Crassus and Caesar were all married.
I'm pretty sure Caesar, Pompey, Mark Anthony, Augustus and Agrippa were all married and had children.
>Is it true that it was a generation of unmarried young men (aka Incels) to overthrow the Senate and establish the Empire?
Like who?
All the big dogs of the era were married, and Augustus, the first Roman Emperor, actually imposed a tax on long-term single men and women (apart from those who opted for celibacy for religious reasons), as well as couples who had no children.
How comes that even today, Brits view him as some sort of hero?
Drake was a murderer and a bandit, nothing more
Unimpeachable loyalty, tireless commitment to improving the situation of his country and a heroic spirit which set the model for Empire builders for generations to come.
Either this is bait, or you're an incredibly dull person for not realising.
>>2746264
>set the model for Empire builders for generations to come
Time to take a nap Winston.
>>2746319
It's an objective statement. By no means am I an imperialist, but he did.
How has Christianity changed since it's conception?
Did they change the texts, or just the church?
>>2746222
Unrecognizable
>>2746227
How so?
>>2746243
Paul completely deviating from the disciples and pulling 99% of it out of his ass.
When the king dies, it would make sense for the queen to become the monarch.
However this is often not the case, as power is, historically at least, typically handed down to the prince who then becomes the new king.
Can someone sum up for me what traditionally becomes of the queen in the event of the king's death? Thanks /his/
>When the king dies, it would make sense for the queen to become the monarch.
no.
King marries a woman -> he's killed -> Queen marries a man -> she's killed -> New King marries again -> etc..
>>2746185
STEP 1 : GO read a book
STEP 2 : it depends so much on the context : some queens were just royal blood baby machines without any power on the state and some of them were... Catherine de Médicis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catherine_de%27_Medici
>>2746185
When the king dies, there is no king, until the queen marries again, or until she abdicates in favor of the king's brother or son, etc.
Sparta is a famous example, Leonidas was some peasant who married the queen, so he acted as king, even though he had zero nobility in him.