How can one organization be so ineffective?
>>2760634
it wasn't designed to be effective
>>2760634
Oh boi, wait until you find about the predecessor
>>2760634
It was a spurious, illogical idea from the start and should've been put in the grave after the first shitty prequel (League of Nations).
Why do people pretend that after formal colonialism in Africa, the European nations simply pulled out and didn't carry on interfering in internal politics?
I mean, it's incredibly historically ignorant to believe that the Euros simply said "you know what? our bad, here you go". I mean have you never heard of transnational trade or anything?
Organisations like the WTO and the WB are ran by Europe and the USA, it's no surprise that the free trade policies they enforce end up benefitting the already developed countries.
You may say that "free trade" is a good thing. Well it would be if you started from a level playing field.
Imagine a small independent grocery/corner shop. Imagine that a Walmart opened up next to it and used it's massive buying power and staff to make their prices cheaper. Customers end up going to the Walmart because it's cheaper and eventually the independent shop closes.
That's what "free" trade is. The West force poorer countries to open their markets up and then come in and help to destroy local industry. They tell poorer countries to focus on one crop to trade globally. The combined effect is that these former colonies are made to become dependent on the west for development. and it's in the west's interest not to allow them to be.
Of course there are corrupt dictators. And they also deserve to be pilloried. But this notion that Africa can't develop because of some intrinsic reason about Africans is nonsense. If a country tries to promote social programs, they will be slapped down by the neoliberals at the WB, IMF and WTO who literally say "no you must stimulate your market, you can't spend money for public services"
These countries were made poor and had their resources exploited and stolen by colonialism, and their resources are still be taken today under an incredibly uneven trade regime.
http://www.naomiklein.org/articles/2011/02/democracy-born-chains
>Want to redistribute land? Impossible—at the last minute, the negotiators agreed to add a clause to the new constitution that protects all private property, making land reform virtually impossible. Want to create jobs for millions of unemployed workers? Can’t—hundreds of factories were actually about to close because the ANC had signed on to the GATT, the precursor to the World Trade Organization, which made it illegal to subsidize the auto plants and textile factories. Want to get free AIDS drugs to the townships, where the disease is spreading with terrifying speed? That violates an intellectual property rights commitment under the WTO, which the ANC joined with no public debate. Need money to build more and larger houses for the poor and to bring free electricity to the townships? Sorry—the budget is being eaten up servicing the massive debt, passed on quietly by the apartheid government. Print more money? Tell that to the apartheid-era head of the central bank. Free water for all? Not likely. The World Bank, is making private-sector partnerships the service norm. Want to impose currency controls to guard against wild speculation? That would violate the $850 million IMF deal, signed, conveniently enough, right before the elections. Raise the minimum wage to close the apartheid income gap? Nope. The IMF deal promises "wage restraint."12 And don’t even think about ignoring these commitments— any change will be regarded as evidence of dangerous national untrustworthiness, a lack of commitment to “reform,” an absence of a "rules-based system." All of which will lead to currency crashes, aid cuts and capital flight. The bottom line was that South Africa was free but simultaneously captured; each one of these arcane acronyms represented a different thread in the web that pinned down the limbs of the new government.
>>2760369
>Waaahh stahp blaming whitey for everything Reeeee :(
Sums it up
History is complex and multifaceted.
Unfortunately, most people are simpleminded and easily bored about any subject if you get too detailed about things. People want clear cut and easily digestible narratives. I'm sure you probably like anime but reading extensively detailed books about anime production would bore you to tears.
>Were the joos gassed?
>Did Hitler do anything wrong?
>How good was NATSOC in Nazi Germany?
>Were the Germans the real good guys?
> Did Hitler do anything wrong?
How is this even a question? The guy was so wrong that he killed himself. Imagine how he could prove his ideas in Nurnberg instead of dying like a coward.
>>2760254
> killed himself
You mean escaped to Argentina/Antarctica
>>2760247
Yes.
Everything.
Terrible if you cared about things like liberty, freedom and was a minority or belonged to a left-wing party.
No.
Were human rights a mistake?
Are human lives overrated?
At what point does a human live loses its valour? if that's even possible.
>>2760039
>Were human rights a mistake?
>Are human lives overrated?
What about the world today gives you the impression that human life in general is rated highly at all?
>>2760039
Human rights are bullshit
>>2760085
Someone gets shot by a cop and riots spark up
Children die in the middle east and the whole region is set on fire
Death penalty is under a negative view
People are still throwing money at African tribes
There is also the fact that we can't outright execute those who are clearly damaging society without doubt and instead are later added to the chain of leeches that live off it. The norm is that human lives are precious and we are not allowed to take them lightly (in public) or we are heading to a slippery slope
Why did Himmler look asian?
HONORARY
>>2759619
ARYAN
>>2759616
Tojo in disguise,
Do you think HHwhite people were able to run concentration camps with their consicence?. Na it's all the eternal nippons fault
Nazis dindu nuffin, hitlah was a gud boy gettin his countries economy togetha
What are some cases of foreigners joining or fighting for another army? I dont mean necessarily as a foreign legion, but more as individual volunteers.
a few instances pop up to me, what are some more?
>proposed English SS Division
>French Charlemagne SS division
>American pilots flying for Poland
>American pilots flying for the RAF
>Hungarians fighting for the Polish underground
there was also that weird battle during the closing days of WW2 where an American unit paired up with a Wehrmacht unit to fight another Wehrmacht/SS unit and liberate POW's, or something of that sort but I dont think that really counts as foreigners in armies
>>2759260
Spain had a foreign legion in the thirties but it eventually desolved because it was mostly just Spaniard and South American people using foreign aliases.
>>2759260
Most of the Carthaginian army ended up being volunteers from wherever they were fighting from, since Carthage itself didn't have a great amount of soldiers to draw from. Hannibal had to constantly get locals to join to keep up the fighting prowess of his army.
>>2759260
Well, off the top of my head, without looking anything up, I can list:
>Dr. Livingstone's (the explorer) son moved to America for a time purely so that he could join the Union Army during the American civil war and help abolish slavery
>George Orwell (the writer) fighting with leftists against Franco during the Spanish Civil War
>Eddie Rickenbacker and other American pilots joining the French Air Force during WW1
>Modern day Mexicans joining the US army to get American citizenship
>The enormous number of foreigners who've gone to Syria to fight there for one side or another, ranging from hardcore jihadists to unbelievably naive westerners.
Weirdest story I ever saw was two Latino gangbangers from LA who went to Syria to fight for Assad for some reason that I'm sure makes sense only in their minds if they're somehow still alive.
I'm getting kind of tired of the race baity threads and was hoping some anons are well versed in Latin American history. So let's have a Gran Colombia thread.
What went wrong?
What could have been done
Would Latin America have been better off?
>>2758643
>What went wrong?
centralism.
People wanting power for themselves betrayed Bolivar.
Thats why it was so easy for USA to split panama. And there was the possibility to be splited even further.
>Would Latin America have been better off?
I don't think so.
There wasn't good leaders after Bolivar in any of these countries till Chavez. (you may like it or hate him but he was a leader).
So chances are that gran colombia would became another big mess like mexico.
>>2758643
>What went wrong?
Like every other Latin American state that fractured, regions with different interests saw themselves as being exploited by and for the capital and its political structure. They weren't necessarily wrong, either. The capital, in turn, tried to force greater centralization which usually just caused more strife.
>What could have been done
Realistically, nothing. Every state in Latin America went through a centrifuge. The confrontational divides they all experienced had existed long before independence came. Mexico just happened to lose fewer parts and that was mainly because their other territories weren't populated enough to actually break off without being broken off by someone else.
>Would Latin America have been better off?
Hard to say. I can't say it would be worse, but I doubt it would be better.
So what would you say how fucked is religion and in particular Christinaity in the West (no brown people)?
>churches are empty
>small minority goes to church every week
>major countries in Europe are already predominantly irreligious
>trend line in all other countries is the same
>religious values have no influence on politics anymore
>basically it is Sodom and Gomorrah in society
>science has pushed god to the edges of the Universe and cringy metaphysics
On a scale of 1 / proper fucked how bad is it?
Also your a/s/l and denomination?
>>2757579
America still is pious supposedly
I bet those who say they are religious know deep down god is bullshit
you would think a people who believed in a heaven would have no fear and yet they hide in their houses while leftist activist youth take the initiative
>>2757579
>On a scale of 1 - to proper fucked..
End Times/10
>>2757579
Most of my country is "religious" (some 90% identify as catholic) in the sense that they go to church and do nothing else related to christianity. They are utterly useless. Our priests are not all that good, either - they are mostly detached and disinterested, and the beauty of the sermons is ruined by their insistence on sounding as if they were bored to hell. Our youth, of which I am part, is nearly beyond repair with irresponsibility, promiscuity, apathy and calousness towards society and others. Most young people I know have at least some form of emotional issues (of which the most common seem to be the unwillingness to seriously commit to anything, particularly relationships, and fears of abandonment) and are almost invariably nihilistic and hostile toward religion and patriotism. Divorce rates are skyrocketing, and the effects of broken families on people are fairly obvious when you get to know them. I am genuinely trying to help people overcome that phase, and have actually had successes with several people, but it is a Sisiphus quest. The whole state of things is tragic. I wish I were joking, or that I could claim those judgements to be inaccurrate on account of knowing too few people, but I am not joking nor can I claim that. Just bloody end this.
t. Croatian catholic
Hitler on Russia "You only have to kick in the door and the whole rotten structure will come crashing down."
It wasn't a stupid assumption, he might have had more luck if he didn't go full autism and drive potential allies right into Papa Stalin's loving arms.
>>2756913
Truly kicking the door in has never been tried.
>>2756913
It's funny how Hitler managed to repeat all the mistakes of WW1. He was so obsessed with his "stab in the back" myth that he never even considered the fact that the German command might have made mistakes.
What monarch has the best royal portrait?
>>2756646
Tie up between this
>>2756655
This
>>2756663
And this
So anon, you wake up and it is suddenly May 1717.You are at the same spot you went to bed last night.
You got period clothing and a bag full of silver worth a skilled craftsman's yearly wages. Also you will find flint&steel plus a small knife in one of your pockets.
So how fucked are you?
Any plans to change the world?
>inb4 sperglords screech "the drop, what about the drop?!?"
I'll probably be arrested on suspicion of being a Jacobite so I may as well actually become one
>>2756259
>being a Jacobite
Bow to the one true king, Wenzel, Lord of the Scots and the English!
>>2756248
>So how fucked are you?
Northern Switzerland, I should be fine.
>Any plans to change the world?
With the money I can build a prototype for cotton gin's combing machines and spinning jennies. If I manage to find investors I can kickstart the Industrial Revolution early.
Either that or emigrating to the America, becoming a wealthy plantation owner.
Were there black people in Ancient Greece or Rome? If so, what did they say about them? What role did they play in society? Were they accepted as Romans?
black nigger brigade black nigger brigade
i fought with them when I tried to get laid
Lucius Septimius Bassianus (April 4, 188 – April 8, 217), commonly known as Caracalla, was a Black Roman Emperor who ruled from 211 to 217.
Caracalla was the eldest son of Septimius Severus, the first black African-born Emperor of Rome. But before Septimius Severus, there had been other Roman-born black Emperors of Rome. This story of the other black emperors of Rome will be explored in another write-up, but for now we focus on Caracalla.
Unlike his father Septimius Severus, Caracalla was born and raised in Italy. After the death of his father, he ruled jointly with his younger brother Geta until the latter’s death in 211.
Caracalla’s reign was notable for the Constitutio Antoniniana, granting Roman citizenship to freemen throughout the Roman Empire. That act laid a foundation for a peaceful multi-ethnic, multi-cultural Empire that Rome was to become.
Very Rare image of Henry II (972-1024) King of Italy and Germany also Holy Roman Emperor during the time of the Ottonian Dynasty. From the Sacramentary of Henry II (1002 -1014). Undeniable proof of so called black presence throughout Europe.
What was its purpose? Was it 'true science' or not?
>>2755245
the purpose was to boost the self-esteem of white bois who couldn't compete with the bbc.
>>2755245
One of countless instances of science trying to be 'objective'. Oh wow, it just happens to confirm the Zeitgeist!
>>2755245
It was to confirm what they had already made up in their minds using stupid categorizations.
It's like the use of Caucasoid; Ethiopians are caucasoid, Tutsi are caucasoid, Fulani are caucasoid, Maasai are caucasoid, Polynesians are Caucasoid, Ainu are caucasoid, Native Americans are caucasoid, everyone who isn't someone we find out right inferior is caucasoid.
It shows an inferiority complex.
>make a "christian nation"
>muh "down with the eagle up with the cross"
>don't even put the cross correctly on the flag
explain
I think they just made a flag that looks pretty, nothing more to it than that. No symbolism, other than using stars and red, white, and blue colors.
The actual flag of the confederacy was originally just the Austrian flag with a blue square with a circle of stars in it.
>>2754754
>Austrian flag
I don't think Austria was discovered yet.
>>2754736
>>don't even put the cross correctly on the flag
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saltire
and at least post a correct/good CSA flag
Did I miss anything/get anything wrong?
I will post a blank.
Astur-Leonese and Aragonese are pretty much dead languages at this point.
>>2752926
> Don Kossack?
Kalmyks (Mongol Buddhist that lives in Russia)