What did all the autistic people who are only good at computer programming do for a living in the ancient past before computers were invented?
>>2766753
Probably were tax collector or calculator type people, or people who checked the granaries.
Scribes
>>2766753
3000-0 bc Scribes
0-1750 ac monks
1750 - scientists
How do we fix /his/?
Why can't redditors just hide threads they don't like?
>>2766567
Those are all "& humanities" so they belong here. Real answer though is to permaban the one guy obsessed with Hitler's dick and poop.
Most of those seem humanities related as >>2766582 said. The biggest problem /his/ has is the endless spew of *blocks your path*-type of threads that are only related to history or humanities because it has some historical figure as its picture which end up not contributing fuck all to the board.
>Churchill dies of a cerebral infarct in May 1940
>Lord Halifax replaces Chamberlain as PM
What would have happened? Would Hitler have won the war? Would there have been a negotiated armistice? Would the British Empire have been saved?
>Britain makes peace with Germany
>Germany invades USSR
>USA has nowhere to stage D-Day, all of mainland Europe becomes Soviet
>Soviets sponsor anti colonial movements
>>2766241
>all of mainland Europe becomes Soviet
retard
>>2766241
Without the Battle of Britain Germany would have retained a large section of the Luftwaffe, making the airlift during Stalingrad successful, thus winning the war.
Have there been any actual examples of a hero being rewarded with the hand of a princess in marriage?
Particularly one who wouldn't already be in a position (socially speaking) to marry said princess even without the supposed heroism.
Does it count if he crushed his enemies, saw them driven before him, and heard the tears and lamentations of their women?
>>2766156
ilya muromets
>Historians pre 1800 live in highly religious societies
>all historic collapses are reduced on weakening faith
>e.g., "Rome collapsed because of the religion shift!"
>Historians 1800~1940 live in societies dominated by nationalism
>all historic collapses are reduced on weakened nationalism
>e.g., "Rome collapsed because there were too many Germanic troops!"
>Historians 1940~2000 live in societies dominated by discussions about ideologies in economy and politics
>all historic collapses are reduced on weakened trade and administration
>e.g., "Rome collapsed because mediterranean trade collapsed, they were overreliant on slaves and they overexpanded their nation!"
>Historians 1940~2000 live in societies dominated by discussions about ideologies in climate change and sustainability
>all historic collapses are reduced on nature and human intrusion in it
>e.g., "Rome collapsed because of a small ice age!/Carthago collapsed because they cut down all trees for their ships!"
Is history just projection of our current ideas and views on the past?
>>2766062
What kind of dog is that?
>>2766075
north korean native devil
>>2766062
Yes and no.
Yes in the fact that those are the things people focus on because they are contemporary.
No in the sense that these were all contributing factors and Rome didn't fall because of any one reason.
>>all historic collapses are reduced on nature and human intrusion in it
What're you even trying to say with this sentence?
>Buddhism
>Hinduism
>Confucianism
>Neoplatoism (just an example)
Compare them with the religions or traditions of Niggers and Sandniggers.
>>2765686
Neoplatonists are just deriving from Vedic ideas.
>>2765698
Greeks did more before that.
>>2765998
But are they "intelligent" religions?
What happened to Caucasian Albania?
That's not where Spain and Portugal are, sweetie
>>2765430
They were taken to Italy as slaves and then transported to the Balkans by George Maniakes to fight in his rebellion against Constantine the 9th
>>2765439
>''American Education''
What are the best arguments against social contract theory?
supercilious scoffing
>>2765359
There isn't a good argument for the theory to begin with.
Whats the point of going to school to learn about history? It seems like you could learn it just as well by yourself if you're disciplined and you can focus on whatever you want stress-free.
>>2765216
sure, but schools might spark an interest in a subject that you otherwise might not be interested in learning about.
>>2765216
completely different beast
>>2765216
Depends on what you want out of it. If you want a piece of paper saying you've learned real good, go to school. If you just want to know a lot of cool shit, just read a bunch, listen to podcasts, and watch TV.
What is the true history of the world?
>history
>he believes in the illusion of chronological progression
>>2765209
It's in the Bible.
>>2765220
this triggers time cucks
Even if Egyptians weren't black they were mixed like latinos. This already proves white supremacists wrong.
It wasnt germanics or meds who started the important civ. It was mixed people like the Egyptians
>>2765140
what
>Mexican is a chink
What did they meab by that?
>>2765178
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_immigration_to_Mexico
pancho villia was known for killing chinks
Are you aware of this phenomenon? In the 19th century, soon after the invention of photography, it became a custom for people to take photographs of their dead. Often, these photos were the only ones that were able to be taken of these people, due to how expensive photography was at the time. This practice still exists for some people, but it has largely fallen out of mainstream fashion by the mid-20th century.
Yes. My family takes photos of relatives in their coffins. I didn't know this was unusual until I was a teenager and a friend came to a cousin's funeral with me and did this dramatic horrified gasp when someone in the family took a photo.
Although, most images described as Victorian post-mortem photos are not actually of dead people, since people have (thanks to dubious websites) mistaken the results of limitations of early photography its corrections/fixes as being dead people.
>>2765106
A lot of people may describe this woman as dead, yet others claim that she is alive in this photograph. She was a burn victim, apparently.
>>2765079
Most are fakes.
Wish him happy birthday, /his/.
>>2765061
gets head cut off
Max plz come back. Look at the republic now.
Robespierre was a hero, and the greatest Liberal of all time.
Happy birthday Maximilien, may the Supreme Being notice humanity by the light you have shed.
Why should Kurdistan exist if it has never existed in centuries? No country called Kurdistan has ever existed to my knowledge. There's only the people who whine about it to this day.
>>2764961
>Why should Kurdistan exist if it has never existed in centuries?
It shouldn't. Kurds are nomads. It would be illogical for nomads to have a sovereign states in a modern sense. Perhaps if we lived in the time of Genghis Khan it would make sense.
>>2764961
>Why should it exist
If the Kurds can prove they can provide a stable government in the region, it would actually be a positive. The Kurds already hold a decent amount of northern Iraq and have been governing it pretty well.
>Why shouldn't it exist
It could pull the US into a second Israel like situation of an established country being hated by all of its neighbors.
>>2764980
>It could pull the US into a second Israel like situation of an established country being hated by all of its neighbors.
Why should America support it? Jews in America (not /pol/ and not memeing) have historically been very powerful and have had the strongest lobbying groups as well as the media and government.
Kurds are just some brown strangers to the American people
I understand that this may come across as "babby's first existential dilemma". But this is honestly something that concerns me.
When I am reading history, how do I know that I am reading truth? How could I prove, for instance, that the Whiskey Rebellion in 1791 actually happened? Or that Caesar was assassinated in 44 BC? We have to go off of historical accounts, but aren't accounts always influenced by propaganda? And the person writing it down always has their own agenda, do they not?
Whenever I'm reading history, there's always this nagging feeling that it may not be 100% true and that certain parts of the story have been colored or altered. Is there any way to get over this fear?
>>2764756
Holocaust did not happen
>>2764756
its never 100% true
you have to find more than one reliable source , which takes a long and arduous time to do
then you take those sources and you make your own assumption
>>2764756
Why do you believe anything anyone says?