I know I am not very smart for this board but I have a friend that is a Kurdish rebel and basically she found a sword that is most likely a reproduction. But it had Nordic runes etched into the guard.
Here is what I found the runes were: ᚠᛅᚢᛒᚫᛕᛁᛘ
I will be posting all the pictures she sent me.
She found it all rusted up rapped in linen before her and her friends cleaned it up.
Who was the best Communist leader and why was it this guy?
>>2810401
Stalin simultaneously did the most good and the most harm
>>2810401
>not Tito
Also Deng Xiaoping if you can consider him a "communist"
Your thoughts on this man
And his amazing moustache
Hundred days offensive lit af
Why were French ww1 field commanders good, but their general staff so terrible?
>>2811248
They weren't That bad, really
Tell me about Shintoism
Will it give me an anime gf ?
>>2810212
Its a form of animism that has been mixed with elements of Buddhism and standardized though the japanese imperial court and later the Meiji government. As such its theology tends to be more refined than most types of animism. it centers around the worship of Kami, normally translated as "Gods" but it can really be any nexus of power. it also has a strong focus on ritual cleanliness
>dude everything is spirits lmao
Most of the criticism of Marxism I come across is only tackling Classical Marxism (what Marx believed) or Marxism–Leninism (what the USSR believed). I do not come across much criticism tackling Orthodox Marxism (those focused on technological advancement) or Western Marxism (those focused on culture).
Do you guys know of any good books/lectures/anything that tackles either Orthodox Marxism or Western Marxism?
who gives a shit, it's all pure cancer
>>2810205
>we need to create a totalitarian state that owns everything so that it can magically dissolve and then everyone will own everything and also there is no money
wew
Read anything by Sowell pretty much.
This was the most harmful event in human history
>>2810102
The guillotine is right this way
A challenger appears.
Weird, that isn't a picture of Estonian independence.
It's July of 1665, you are in the city of london. In a warm and damp April, trade vessels from the Netherlands had come bearing a fowl pestilence, spreading from the fleas on rats, and spreading to the surrounding humans. By now all of England is in panic, the government is practically paralysed and your city of London is in lockdown. With townspeople dying in the streets of mysterious pestilence, you dont have any understanding of plague other than books that have been written by that historical point. ( no books at that point acknowledged rats nor fleas ) as well, you have no access to modern medical equipment. Your only goal is to survive by any accessible means, god help you
>>2810064
>A fowl pestilence
A falcon and fowling piece
i guess id just stay away from poor sectors like the infamous cock and key alley and try to survive by surrounding myself with the rich and healthy
Wait, if I have no Knowledge of the Plague, then surely I'm not the same person. As somehone who does have knowledge of the plague, how could I possibly predict what I would do if I did not have that knowledge. I would probably panic and die, or else run like fuck.
Hello again fellow /his/torians. Today is the 3rd day of the Spring Babby Cup .
>What is this?
A virtual divegrass tournament run in Pro Evolution Soccer and streamed for the enjoyment of anons everywhere.
>Why the should I care?
Dank memes, high levels of bants and hype by the bucket load. For more info see implyingrigged.info
Our team is on high spirit since the 1st match when the horsefuckers of /mlp/ were crushed by the might of Prussian steel. Now we will be facing against /sci/. The match will start in 10 minutes so GET HYPE and remember
>H
>R
>E
>>2809674
whats our lineup?
>>2809682
>>2809674
VLAD WITH THE OPENING GOAL
Why is there so much communist criticism of capitalism but not as much capitalist criticism of communism?
But there is
Communism doesn't have any practical application in the current world, and when it did it collapsed or became capitalism in time.
Anyone who has been through any policy class can tell you it is incredibly easy to criticize policy, coming up with viable alternatives is far more difficult
>>2809669
To sum up my point, communist criticize everything endlessly because they can't do anything else
Were knights a thing in Spain and Italy?
>>2809645
Yes.
Savoyards were the original shitposters.
Why wouldn't they ?
It always makes me think, when someone affirms that the reason why battles used to be conducted in lines is because the muskets were inaccurate. What makes them think that being in close formation improves the accuracy of a weapon ? 10 shooters in loose order can shoot just as well as 10 shooters in close order. All it does is make you a bigger target, so it didn't give any advantage for ranged combat.
But if you look at how infantry fought before the age of gunpowder, you can see why they use the close order : it allowed each man in a formation to assist the next one in melees.
Even after the invention of firearms, cavalry and bayonet charges remained a threat. Because of the reloading speed of the weapons (roughly 20 seconds), a unit that had just fired became vulnerable to a counter-charge, and that's why the tight order was used.
Another bizarre opinion is that Volley fire was supposed to offset, again, the inaccuracy of muskets. Could you explain to me how that works ? How I see it : 100 shots in one volley have the same firepower than 100 staggered shots. The only difference is, if not waiting for the order to shoot, everyone reloaded at different times, which could cause problems, I suppose, for the group to be able to maneuver as a unit.
>>2809563
Many reasons exist, but I can't answer with any certain authority on the matter beside what I know.
The one reason that comes to mind is:
>Loose formation
>Shoot one round
>Begin to reload
>Cavalry, an injun, some Hoodoo, or General Custer himself begins to charge me
>Forget about reloading and just run and drop my shit
>Enemy gains all that ground that I just retreated from
In a formation:
>We all fire at once
>Their forces fall by 5%
>Kneel
>Line behind me fires
>Their forces fall by another 5%
>Line behind THEM fires all at once
>Their forces fall by another 5%
>After all that, we're finally done loading, so we can just straight up continue shooting again until they all either rout, surrender, or die
>>2809563
The first row would shoot, then duck to reload while the line behind them fired over their heads. This is the only way they could press fire continuously considering the reload time. Order is important in carrying out military operations, if you gave a bunch of dudes guns and told them to charge it wouldn't turn out well.
>>2809563
>Another bizarre opinion is that Volley fire was supposed to offset, again, the inaccuracy of muskets. Could you explain to me how that works ? How I see it : 100 shots in one volley have the same firepower than 100 staggered shots. The only difference is, if not waiting for the order to shoot, everyone reloaded at different times, which could cause problems, I suppose, for the group to be able to maneuver as a unit.
Because again, as you've pointed out, melee combat, or the threat of melee combat, was still an important part of line battle. Sure, you want to kill enemy soldiers when you shoot, but that's not all, you want to kill them in the most efficient manner to either force them to break and run, or to set them up for a decisive follow-up, possibly in melee. To that end, killing specific sections of their army is more useful than just randomly killing people all over their formation, ideally, you want most of your firepower concentrated at a small section of their group, break that, and then flood through the gap.
But, as noted, muskets don't have great accuracy. Getting that sort of pinpoint concentration is hard to do when your formation is scattered, because they can't fire all that far and hope to hit anything, and it's hard to direct them in an era where signalling was done by flag or by shouting.
It's not about maximizing overall deaths from musket fire, it's about breaking a specific point of the enemy, which you are better served by tightly packing your men.
What was European culture originally an outgrowth of? I know that a lot of the tradition came from Greece and Rome and that Minoan civilization is seen as a starting point of European culture in a since. But I mean where did the Celtic, Germanic and Slavic cultures come from? Indo-European? So West Asian? What are some cultures that majorly influenced them. Christianity obviously had a major effect in the middle ages but what else?
It's a subdivision of African culture that was carried upwards through the Sahara, into North Africa and eventually made its way to Europe. It broke off long ago and slowly transformed into its own thing, European culture.
>>2809591
Do you have examples of transitional points? I know we are talking about prehistory mostly.
>>2809614
Lots of it has been erased from history thanks to Eurocentrism, however the evidence lies in basic understandings of geography and the out of Africa theory.
It's tough to refer you to exact sources but if you do proper research you'll come to the same conclusion as I have. Good luck with your findings.
Was Moses real?
Of course not, there's no evidence of the Israelites ever being in Egypt in any major capacity.
>>2809345
How does that prove Moses didn't exist?
yes and he had horns
What was the greatest Egyption invention?I really like some of the art and language they had laying around about the place
>>2809283
You have an unhealthy obsession anon.
>>2809283
No it wasn't it was a Lake Chad specific haplogroup.
>>2809297
>being this buttfingered
What's the deal with secret police? They're not secret and they're not police.
>>2809043
They are police and the secret is you don't know what bullshit pretext they are going to arrest/kill you for.
>>2809043
millions upon millions die for this joke
>>2809080
What's the deal with National Socialism?
It's Not national and there's no Socialism.