>greatest orator of all time
>wrote a classic novel
>decent artist
>great politician
>loved his homeland
>something that may or may not have happened and if it did happen happened without his knowledge or consent tarnished his legacy
I feel for the guy.
The guy was a loser. He lost. He looks like an autistic faggot. Look at his fucking mustache.
He got beat by the "jewish bolsheviks" you faggots
accept this faggot you worship a faggot loser
>>2812172
>Decent artist
His artwork was beyond autistic the man couldn't get basic perspective right.
>>2812180
Loser couldn't even face it had to blow his brain out because he realized how much of a faggot germanic barbarian loser he was.
>Baby Jesus is visited from wise men from the east
>they followed a star to find him
>His childhood isn't recorded
>suddenly he appears in Middle east preaching radical stuff similar to buddhism
>atheist scholars accept he was a real person but never critically examine the resurrection and will call the idea of him surviving the cross ridiculous, despite accepting other parts of the gospels as a source.
>Goes back to the East
>he even has a tomb there
>people still refuse outright to even entertain this idea.
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xY0Ib3aPG6Y
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roza_Bal
>>2811860
"Jesus was a rabbi" t.jews
"Jesus was a buddhist monk" t.buddhist
"Jesus was a prophet but not ours" t.muslims
>>2811860
>he even has a tomb there
Christ is Risen.
This shows everything as wrong in your theory.
>>2811860
>suddenly he appears in Middle east preaching radical stuff similar to buddhism
Granted, I have only a casual knowledge of Buddhism, but I'm pretty sure they don't preach a belief that the world is going to end imminently and one must repent and purify yourself before that happens.
Is the horseshoe theory accurate?
>>2811720
Yes pretty much
Anyone that disagrees is probably an extremist
>>2811720
just like evolution it's just a theory and should be dismissed offhand
Only because poltical extremists are usually basketcases. "Radical for the sake of being radical". Compare stormnigger forums and far left forums there is a lot of overlap complete with purity spiralling and reductionist worldviews.
What can modern day people learn from history in how to fight Communism? It's proven itself to be the most destructive, anti human ideology in world history. What examples of anti-Communist resistance can we take to prevent further genocides at the hands of Commie sociopaths?
>>2811481
>What examples of anti-Communist resistance can we take to prevent further genocides at the hands of Commie sociopaths?
You can't, the gulag awaits for you.
>>2811492
>>2811481
where did the fedora wearing communist meme start? Isn't a 1950's western businessman the opposite of what they want to dress like?
What does /his/ think of Catalonia, would they make for a nice independent state?
Im screwing a girl from there and man are they inmensely patriotic and anti-Spain
>>2811475
Catalonia would be in a pretty good position, compared to Spain as a whole. They are economically stronger and this is the reason all of the rest of Spain is afraid of them leaving.
They are the proof that racist and elitist nationalism are fine as long as you identify with the left.
Left-wing nationalism is a joke
>"Spaniards out! Somalis in!"
What do you choose to refer to it as?
The Levant?
>>2811397
Byzantium
>>2811397
They referred to themselves as the Roman empire.
what we call them is irrelevant
French troops during Napoleons invasion of Egypt are usually blamed but IIRC people are claiming it's a myth they destroyed it these days
Nobody, noses are quite liable to break off of statues through natural wear and tear.
>>2811336
He was black
Was this a mistake?
>>2811192
Yeah, an unstable shithole that ended up cannibalizing itself. Franco didn't even need to fight them really, they were perfectly capable of collapsing on their own.
>finally, Spain is a democratic Republic!
>now let's alienate half of the population
Too stupid to live.
No
Wish I could've fought for the republic
https://youtu.be/LQdDnbXXn20
>>2810986
Fuck off kike
basically boils down to
>my country right or wrong, war is hell
no real arguments to be had here
>>2810986
We dindu nuffin! Wez gud boiz an shieeet!
Why did bourgeois people create communism? Isn't that kind of against the class struggle they argued should be conscious in classes of people (i.e, spooking people with the delusion of class solidarity)?
Or was not having a polyamorous fuck party without being judged too much of a 'capitalist oppression' for them?
Why are communists such hypocritical bourgeois losers?
Communists are simultaneously accused of being rich bourgeois hypocrites and bitter poor lazy losers. Make up your mind, anti-communists.
bourgeois are the type which benefit under communism because they are able to get in on the ponzi sooner so they aren't the suckers out in the fields or fasting.
>>2810939
>Why did bourgeois people create communism?
Poor people don’t start revolutions, they’re too poor and uneducated to much more than riot, which the Powers That Be can easily suppress.
Middle class people on the other hand, grow up in relative comfort and have access to education, yet aren’t part of the upper ruling class and thus understand the problem and are capable of coming up with a solution.
In the case of Communism, the solution wasn’t viable, as the system eliminates personal desire (or at least attempts to) and that’s just not going to work, as it’s human instinct to make a better life for yourself and your children.
Disgusting. You should instead follow "economic stability": a good pension at 78, a life spended on making money and doing a job that you don't like to live a life that you don't want. How the fuck can people think like this? This is literally throwing your life in a bin and blocking whatever form of happiness in your life. When people lose balls and valued money, hedonistic consumerism, wasting time and the illusion of stability over self achievement, happiness, individuality and boldness?
>&Humanities
t. butthurt philosophy major
Sorry breh, but "following your passions in life" is the epitome of the rich upper middle class white boy mindset, the rest of us shitkickers will do whatever we can as long as it leads to a decent wage and a half decent benefits package.
With the advancement of drones, both air and ground, what will be the future of infantry? At this point they are essentially glorified forward observers. They still have value in highly nuisanced Ops, like COIN ops, where there is a large civilian contingent in the crossfire. Eventually FO ops will be completely taken over by machines, and pretty soon. I envision a furture where the infantry is mostly tasked with psyops and civil affairs type missions.
Thoughts?
>At this point they are essentially glorified forward observers.
Not really. Just like eveyone sperged out on "there will never be a tank battle ever again" - and now look at the Ukrainian war.
Same with infantry - it's versatility is why I do not see it ever really going away - at the very least as a plan B if the machine FO system is disabled (have a look at electronic warfare in the same Ukraine war).
There are many areas in the world where drones are very ineffective, especially agaisnt guerrilla groups, who will continue to be the most prominant threat for the next century
You need infantry to take strategic positions without massive collateral damage, to fight in urban areas and to police populations. Infantry will be reduced in overall functions but still retain roles which other combat arms cannot fulfill.
think about it....
they are using swords, so physical strength advantage that men have over women would be mute
>>2810739
No, physical strength still counts for something in melee combat.
>>2810739
>theoretically
I don't know who these people are.
>>2810739
Just try it
How much is the Louvre worth?
>>2810600
As much as it's purchaser will buy for it
it's 'priceless'
>>2810609
/thread
Would Marx be more widely respected now if he had just stuck to critiquing Capitalism instead of inventing his own shit system that lead to the death of millions?
Marx is widely respected.
He barely wrote anything about communism though, so that's mainly already true.
I haven't read much Marx but from what I understand advocacy for violent socialist revolution is a small percentage of his work. The majority of his stuff simply WAS just analyzing capitalism.