This is Helga. She is a model. She would never do porn because it is "degenerate". Yet she is willing to do "artsy" nude photos.
The purpose of this thread is to empirically prove that nude pictures like these are not art, but fapping material, and that Helga is not an art model, but a slut. Please help the experiment by reporting on your fapping procedure.
We also thank the modelling agents/photographers who convince the girls that the purpose of the photo is not jizz-collecting but art, effectively brainwashing them.
Thank them for allowing us to jizz to "artsy" 10/10 beauties we couldn't otherwise.
I think the main difference is that you can see these are kind of tasteful. Sure, she's naked but it's different from being fucked on camera.
You can blow your load to them and I'm pretty sure she knows that's what's happening, but you only get to imagine the dirty kinky shit you'd do to her, not see it. She keeps some dignity.
Fucking in front of a camera is also tasteful. With a taste of lust
Yes, I can blow my load to her pics, and I have indeed, many times. What I argue here is that the main purpose of these pics is indeed to make some anon's dick feel good from time to time, not cultural enrichment. Even though porn and pics like these differ in their means, they have the same goal. And thus, Helga is a semen demon, and not an object of art. That's why she is in this porn board thread. She is not getting the treatment she wants. No one here cares about her artistic expression. But we care about her being a nude slut eye candy. We care about her long, slim legs, her pubic hair, her lush boobs and her slutty facial expression on a very fappable face. We are giving her the treatment Helga, the sex object, deserves. We are watching her pictures while we stroke our cocks, accomplishing her main purpose in life: to bring carnal pleasure to random, jerking men.
You should also help her reach her true potential. Start fapping!
I'd argue that art and pornography aren't mutually exclusive unless you define pornography in a more specific manner than "stuff that's likely to get guys hard and/or gals wet".
People trying to combine the two is hardly a recent development, either. It's been a staple of both literary and visual art since fuck knows how long. Pic related.
She thinks she's not a whore. Our jizz proves her wrong.
She's sitting on a cube. So this is art, not fap material.
>The purpose of this thread is to empirically prove that nude pictures like these are not art, but fapping material, and that Helga is not an art model, but a slut.
I don't think you're gonna prove anything, let alone that she has sex with a lot of people. But whatever floats your boat I guess.
Also this belongs in /s/.
1. This belongs in /s/
2. We have 2 boards because division exists
3. You are a lunatic talking to himself in taiwanese digimon exchange forums
4. Man can fap to everything. I once fapped to tea mug standing on a table just to prove to myself that I can.
either back up your argument
get back to fapping
It doesn't matter to me what you do
if she doesn't want you to do it
then don't do it
it would just won't look sexy if she doesn't consent
case in point
the face of someone who REALLY wants it.
if that face was more apprehensive, it wouldn't nearly be as hot