Found this vid really hot. From the girl's facial expressions, to the nice booty bouncing on top of the strap on, and the pussy gripping, and ass squeezing. Kinda my go to.
>: Sinn Sage & Annabelle Lee
it seems to have been removed from xhamster
here is a link..just skip past the front part..no idea why that is there
vporn dot com
Damn, this thread might be a top 10 of the year already, no bitching about lesbian orgasms, no bitching about random shit, lots of saucing going on. Its just people posting videos, like 50 out of 92 posts which is really good for /gif/ and mostly positive posts with no name calling. Nice job guys.
just because she doesn't have sex with a man doesn't mean she can't use a dildo shaped like one.
just because she doesn't have sex with a horse doesn't mean she can't use a dildo shaped like one
whatever feels good is fair game
Holy shit, I tried to look up girl pile and there is an actual secret society of women in San Francisco who meet up and lay on a huge bed and fuck. I hate being a man so much sometimes.
Have you ever pleasured a woman? Even if you're not using your dick, it is easy to get swept up in the energy of the moment and breath and moan with your partner. You're not fucking her, it is a mutual thing. I can't imagine actresses being immune to this, especially if the bottom is responsive. Try not being a selfish twat for once.
There's more to sexuality than just gender. A lesbian could enjoy dicks, fake or not, but that doesn't automatically mean she's attracted to the rest that comes with them.
That's like doubting a guy's homosexuality for using a fleshlight.
It's not about the equipment, it's about who it's attached to most of the time.
This is the same reason futafags or guys who like chicks with strap-ons get pissy when retards endlessly call them gay, because it makes no sense to base your orientation around the plumbing alone without taking the person wielding it in context.
Unless said lesbian is explicitly seeking out men to fuck instead of or in addition to other women she's not straight or bisexual no matter the shape of the toys she jams in herself.
I remember having a really old favorite video years back, of some womans friend coming into her bedroom with just a trench coat on, and opening to reveal a strap on and going to town on her
tfw u lose ur favs
Yeah I read that too, if I could be guaranteed of some action, maybe I'd get implants just get it out of my system then get them removed. Just being surrounded by all kinds of fat bbw's eating each other out and spewing squirt everywhere, breaking out Hitachi's and strap ons. Yum.
My fear was that I couldn't help getting an erection and then they would freak out and kill me.
lesb here, definitely this
Often have fantaisies of getting penetrated, but never by actual males
Turns out most strap on are dick-shaped, but really it's just the feeling of (the girl) getting something inside of you that feels good to me
i wish there were more good lesbian strapon productions which focused on fucking
whippedass is occasionally good but it depends on how much bdsm they throw in and whether or not the dom is good. i almost lost my mind when they had cherry torn doing every scene because holy shit she's terrible
hotandmean is too brazzers-y, fake and full of ridiculous swearing. which is funny because scenes purported to be targeted at lesbians are often too gentle and loving
Taking this troll question at face value, you're a Lesbian if your a woman whose sexual PREFERENCE is for women.
Doesn't mean you can't enjoy giving blowjobs to men, or having your pussy licked by a man. Doesn't mean you can't enjoy being fucked by a man. Doesn't mean you can't enjoy being fucked by a woman with a strap on, or doing the fucking yourself. Its about which GENDER you are attracted to.
IE, you're not gay if you are capable of getting off from a blowjob from another man. You're gay if you PREFER to get blowjobs from men.
>>You do realise that people get paid to do porn, right? It is literally immaterial whether it turns them on or not. They're called 'actresses' for a reason.
I think the better term is "performers" and I disagree. Real emotional content/sexual excitement shows on screen. Doesn't mean it can't be faked convincingly (because it can), but not every porn performer is good at it.
And not every porn performance is faked. Yes, there is always a theatrical component, but these are human beings engaging in actual sexual activity. There is real stimulation, and sometimes real attraction or excitement. Again, not always, but sometimes.
Only thing about that, women are born with a hole, and wired to enjoy things being shoved in it. Fingers, tongues, dildos, strap-ons, it's still working the mechanics of their genitals. So lesbians, yes, have sex by shoving things into each other's socket. But it's a socket playing with a socket all the same.
Men have a plug though. Their mechanic to have it shoved into something. So a plug being attracted to another plug is kinda homo. With futafags, if it's futa-on-female, that's just a reasonable extension of wanting to watch lesbians. But when they themselves crave getting the dick from a futa, that's really kinda gay.
If nature intended for you to be entirely straight, it wouldn't have put that prostate so close to your rectum, Einstein.
As one of my favorite porn stories from my usenet days put it, "Maybe it's time you stopped worrying so much about what things were 'meant for' and starting thinking about what things are 'good for'."
I'm pretty open about this kind of thing, but that sounds positively retarded anon. Enjoying sex with men is antithetical to being a lesbian by the very definition of the term.
What you're describing is bisexuality which can come in different degrees of preference for either gender.
Women's assholes weren't designed for penetration anymore than men's were but I doubt you raise as much of a ruckus over that.
In the case of futanari it's just taking the same concept behind strap-ons to a level not allowed by reality. I assure you, if women could fasten actual tactile flesh-and-blood dicks to their crotches whenever they wanted nobody would bother with the plastic shit.
>>Enjoying sex with men is antithetical to being a lesbian by the very definition of the term.
You're mistaken. Please do yourself a favor and go look up the definition of the term.
A Lesbian is a woman who primarily experiences sexual attraction or romantic love directed towards other women. Again, that label is about sexual PREFERENCE, not behavior nor anatomy.
Yes, in practice, most lesbian women don't want/choose to have sex with men, but some do, at least some of the time, and many have done so at one point or another during their lives. That they do or don't enjoy it when it happens is irrelevant. . .if they prefer women they're lesbian.
And to the point, any mechanical stimulation of the genitals is likely to be pleasurable, regardless of who does it. Just because you enjoy person A doing it to you doesn't mean that your primary sexual attraction is to type A, or that you're even attracted to type A at all.
>>If nature intended for you to be entirely straight, it wouldn't have put that prostate so close to your rectum, Einstein.
Prostate has to be close to you penis simply because of what it does. By extension.its anatomically impossible for it to be too far away from the rectum.
In fact, I think its perfectly reasonable to conclude exactly the opposite of above. If "nature" intended your prostate to be a normal and/or significant source of direct sexual gratification, it wouldn't have buried it way deep inside your pelvis where the overwhelming majority of males never receive direct stimulation.
And to be clear, I'm all for prostate stimulation if you enjoy it, but I don't think this "god meant for you to get fucked up the ass" argument holds water.
>If nature intended for you to be entirely straight, it wouldn't have put that prostate so close to your rectum, Einstein.
Good job failing evolution 101.
Nature doesn't "intend" to do anything, it's just whatever random mutation fucks up the least survives and creates new offspring.
The position of the prostate next to the rectum or somewhere else in the body that was still the same distance from your dick wouldn't change your survivability in any major way.
Also if you want to appeal to what nature "intended", then there would be no gays, because homosexuals don't (often) reproduce, thus being genetic failures.
Repeated behavior implies a preference since human beings do not voluntarily do things they find unpleasant unless there is some reward or trade off and in our current society there is no strong incentive to violate your own orientations.
Every definition I found was vague and gave a definition amounting to little more than "a female homosexual." I don't doubt that preference is a huge part of any definition that goes in depth, but I'm sure behavior does also given the two are tied.
I'd never make the argument that a woman who has been with a man is immediately disqualified from being a lesbian given most women in our society will end up that way before discovering themselves.
The point however is that repeatedly seeking out sexual relations with a man implies a preference for it in some way, it would not keep happening otherwise, so a woman who routinely has sexual relations with a man can't very well call herself a lesbian for that reason.
She could be a bisexual woman who enjoys sex with both but prefers to be with women, either sexually or romantically, but as long as she keeps seeking and enjoying sexual relations with men I don't think the lesbian label applies.
I realize that in the social-hierarchy laden trap that LGBT circles often are the B gets bottom shelf when it comes to a sense of belonging or representation, but trying to identify as an L or a G while going out of your way to enjoy intimate relations with the opposite sex seems rather delusional and completely counterproductive to having those terms mean any practical difference at all.
Again, you're mistaken.
Plenty of female prostitutes are lesbian. So that's a sizable cohort of lesbian women who regularly and deliberately seek out and have sex with men. There are lesbian women who are married to men, who still have sex with their husbands.
For the Nth time, "gay" "lesbian" (etc) are descriptors of sexual PREFERENCE, not sexual activity. Yes, obviously in an optimal world, people would only have sex with those they love, or at least those they are attracted to, etc, but the real world doesn't work that way.
Here's another example for you to chew on. In prison, the *only* non-solo sexual outlet for men is with other men, and plenty of men engage in homosexual behavior when in prison. Are they all "gay"?
Answer, only the ones who prefer to have sex with men when they AREN'T in prison are gay.
>The prostate is a compound tubuloalveolar exocrine gland of the male reproductive system in most mammals.
>of the MALE reproductive system
Looks like you're the virgin, mate.
When she pulls her close with her arms and legs, hnngg...
Men in prison don't have a choice of who they get to fuck so that comparison is woefully off base. In fact, the whole idea of a "rape culture," was originally coined with that in mind.
A female prostitute also doesn't really count since I already mentioned in the post you just quoted, "...human beings do not voluntarily do things they find unpleasant unless there is some reward or trade off..." A lesbian prostitute engaging with male clientele is doing so for economic reasons, the same way "gay-for-pay" pornstars do it.
I'm not labeling people who have no choice in who they fuck, have to do it for economic reasons, or simply have certain experiences along the way to discovering themselves. I'm talking about women who go out of their way to continually have sexual relations with men without any of those extenuating circumstances.
Labeling women who repeatedly choose of their own free and unburdened will to have sex with men lesbians seems like a complete and total disregard for the term since in those circumstances the behavior is very much a part of preference.
>It's not about the equipment, it's about who it's attached to most of the time.
By that logic gay men should be attaching fake pussy strapons and getting their boyfriends to fuck them with it because it's not about teh equipement right?
>gay men do use fuckable toys. you just arent gay so you wouldnt know + you only look at this type of porn. dipshit.
Bruv. It was a) a joke, and b) pure speculation based on others' claims. Chill out, watch some "lesbians" do naughty things to each other or something.
Are you trying to imply gay men never use fleshlights?
A cock is external equipment which makes it a thousand times easier to form into plastic and attach to a harness to be worn by someone with nothing in the way versus replicating the same process for internal anatomy to be worn by someone with something in the way.
What you're talking about doesn't happen out of a matter of simple logistics, anon.