What does /gd/ think about Materialize? http://materializecss.com/

>>250358
"Material design" is like a crude version of the original flat shit. I wonder want went wrong.

>>250358
its not bad, i use parts of it on my current project. I specially like the form elements.

what ghastly horrible shadows everywhere. Are we back in 2010?

>>250380
cannot unsee.

>>250358
if you really want google's style, use Angular-Material

I love it, idk why, but i just do.

>>250358
>Called Materialize
>"Uses" Material Design
>Ignores correct colour palettes
>Doesn't use correct layering

Fuck off. There's a whole fucking website by Google dedicated to proper material design and you fuck it up. Grats

At first I bought into MD but after a couple projects i reverted back to flat because it really is so much simpler to work with.

That being said, this is a bad example of MD. Sounds like the guy focused way too much on drop-shadows without thinking about the z-scale at all. Not every fucking block element has to have a shadow in MD you know.

How does this differ from Bootstrap?