What does /g/ thing about Vivaldi? https://vivaldi.com Minu

File: 1452104480275.gif (399KB, 512x398px) Image search: [Google]

399KB, 512x398px

>>52874013
0/10 $hill harder

>>52874013
It's shit, you're shit, and you're waifu a shit.

Now fuck off.

>>52874013
>closed source
it's shit

I like vivaldi
Too bad it's not very stable on linux

Used as daily driver for some months, the best current browser. Firefox is dead and the other chrome clones have less features. It can only get better.

File: vivaldi.png (235KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

235KB, 1600x900px

>>52874013
been using it for a few weeks now, it's pretty good so far.

>proprietary user interface slappen on open source software
i shouldn't tell you how i feel about this.

File: ABORT VIVALDI ABORT.png (192KB, 1119x981px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 1119x981px

>using vivaldi
Enjoy your mossad botnet you jew loving faggots

>>52874013
fuck off botnet shill

File: screencapture-vivaldi-com-team-1454981880115.jpg (3MB, 2064x5083px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2064x5083px

top kek

File: screenshot_487.png (139KB, 1920x707px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 1920x707px

>>52874925
You were saying?

>>52875063
>using a search engine that tracks you more than Google
zozzle'd

laggy javascript user interface and proprietary

>>52874013
That dammed excessive CPU usage with media is stopping me from using more.

>>52874013
>nonfree software
dogshit, see >>51971506

>>52874013
Pretty good composer desu

>>52875063
>duckduckshit
0 results and it still tracks you, good job

>>52875198
AND ddg confirmed run by Jews

It's literally shit. I installed it and played without for about 24 hours before I realized how fucking broken it is.

Notworththehassle/10.

>>52875227
What isn't run by jews?

File: 1452363331178.jpg (10KB, 375x375px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 375x375px

>>52875008
>takes 33 people to hack a minimalist UI on top of chromium

>>52875198
Nice FUD.

Reminder that Startpage/Ixquick is completely proprietary, while Duckduckgo is only partially.

>>52874013
is shit and meme

>>52874593
>daily driver
your mom is a daily driver on my cock

Just another failed attempt at succeeding Opera. Once Firefox commits sudoku and only Chrome clones are left I'll use one, but it'll probably be Opera because it doesn't look like shit and is at least not written in node.js

don't think i can use a non-free browser.

if it goes that way, then i will split my time with it.

>>52875083
what search engine then?

>>52874822
why are there two sets of back/forward buttons?

>>52874013
Botnet

>take a open-source engine
>slap a html5 interface over it
>???

And, still, it's the best browser available, aside from being proprietary. How the mighty have fallen.

>>52875741
"Fast Forward" and "Rewind".
I have them hidden but I can give you a use case.
Searching through a forum you click on a thread. Fast forward to go to the next page of the thread, fast forward again for the 3rd page, etc etc. Click the rewind to go back to the lists of threads. I think that's all it does really. Instead of looking for the thread list link or spamming the back button, you can just rewind.

File: 2016-02-08-214642_1366x768_scrot.png (188KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 1366x768px

I think it's pretty good to be honest.

Switched from modern Opera to it about a week ago. I really like it so far, but I wish I could drag tabs to other windows.

>>52875927
Are you kidding me? It can't even do that?

>>52875934
Nope. You can right click and "move to" the other window but cant drag. Unless there is a setting I'm not seeing

>>52875934
Opera is dead, Anon.
They threw away everything that made them unique.

The creators of Vivaldi are former founders of Opera. They saw how the company went to shit and are trying to make a browser more similar to the old Opera that they loved.

>>52875980
I know what Vivaldi is, it's just sad that they went for fucking Blink with a Node.JS UI. Mozilla seems to be doing well at killing Firefox and SeaMonkey'll probably be killed in the process, I'm running out of backups for when Opera is truly kill and everything coming seems worse

It's a sad age for browsers

>>52874013
Bloat: The Browser

>>52876019
What's bloated about it?

>>52876035
Has features I don't care about. What's not bloated about it?

>>52876047
It had alot of features I didn't care for. But I find myself using them now, pretty nice. I suppose any modern browser that isn't is considered bloat then. What's life like shit posting with Lynx?

>>52874013
>chromium
>HTML-based UI
>doesn't even try to fit in with the OS
how about no

>>52874128
I disagree. I'm running

1.0.377.10 (Developer Build) dev (64-bit)

and it runs pretty well for me. Are you on the alpha version?

>>52875912
you use xterm and what looks to be default tint2, what use is your opinion?

it uses bing

it's a fucking piece of shit

>>52874013
yet another chromium based browser, but proprietary
into the fucking trash

>>52876807
>bing
New porn browser it is. Like seriously bing is where its at if you don't want your search results filtered.

It's proprietary garbage, only cool thing it did was create the uses no memory meme. Maybe brave will be an actually good newcomer that will challenge chrome and firefox and IE

O T T E R
T
T
E
R

B R O W S E R
R
O
W
S
E
R

>>52875391
duckduckgo never finds what I am looking for. Using !g at the end of it literally solves that problem

>>52877004
Does otter browser even have a software license? I've done a search and apparently otter is under GPL3, but I can't find the license on the site or their github page.

File: nose.png (377KB, 555x1068px) Image search: [Google]

377KB, 555x1068px

>>52875008
OY VEY

THE NOSE KNOWS

>>52877075
OK found it, the license its under is indeed GPL3. It was shoved away in a file called otter-browser.spec in a folder called packaging. It makes no sense why they didn't include a copy of the license in the root directory of their github page.

>>52875008

>chef and housekeeping

is it necessary that she appears in the credits?

it´s a nice touch though

File: EXCEL_2016-02-06_23-27-20.png (41KB, 745x295px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 745x295px

Tried it, felt ok. But had too many little annoyances that made me switch back to chromium.

Issues with:
speedial, bookmarks, unable to rearrange icons on bookmark tab, some other shit.
Maybe in a year or two..

File: Vivaldi[1].jpg (148KB, 1284x1533px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 1284x1533px

Could Vivaldi really still be alive?

File: Cover.jpg (1MB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1000x1000px

>>52877004
Why this over Vivaldi? Looking for a FF replacement and so far Vivaldi is all that comes close.

>>52875934
It's almost like it's in beta!

>>52877054
The bang syntax is why DDG will always be my default search engine.

>>52877054
It does general searcehs just fine. I only use Google for very new stuff (less than 2 days) and anything ultra specific.

Plus, the bands make it worth it.

>>52875008
>Innovation House Rockstar
sigh.

>>52877838
That functionality exists in firefox by default, I imagine most other browsers could do something similar and you could thereby cut out the middle man.