Finally your prayers have been answered. Finally a browser w

Should have just forked Firefox 36.

>>52572756
Someone post a W3C compliancy test result

When the fuck did /g/ got stormed with SJWs?

that "dev" team looks like my japanese animes

hi

>>52572756
>another Chrome skin
Ugh.

File: yan.jpg (128KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 1024x1024px

>software engineer in charge of privacy/security

>>52573025
I'd trust the keys to my home to her rather than some bigot neckbeard libertarian running gentoo

>>52572756
>it blocks ads
>by replacing it with its own 'approved' ads
LOL

>Then we put clean ads back,
to fund website owners and Brave users alike. Users can spend their funds to go ad-free on their favorite sites.

This is a whole new level of "cuck" and I feel disgusted knowing it exists.

The dev team look like a bunch of fucking faggots. DROPPED.

>>52573025
>she will never be your gf
>you will never install gentoo together

File: 1446105747329.jpg (311KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

311KB, 1280x720px

>>52573025
Reminds me

>>52572756
> The new Brave browser blocks all the greed and ugliness on the Web
> Then we put clean ads back

Oh Eich. I believed in you...

>>52572756
>A browser worth using
>replaces ads with their own ads

Go shill this piece of shit elsewhere

File: Untitled.png (22KB, 1915x109px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 1915x109px

I was interested in this until I saw that it has that stupid approved ad horse hockey. I'll just stick with Firefox tweaked to look like an older version, thanks.

>>52573025
That's it boys. We trash firefox and chrome now.

>>52574980
but brave is actually chrome

File: Richard Stallman.png (739KB, 954x1400px) Image search: [Google]

739KB, 954x1400px

>>52572756
But is it libre software?

>>52573025
>has firefox sticker on her thinkpad
>forks chromium instead of fx
okay

>written in JS
>Install it using Node
lol

File: no thank you.jpg (135KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 800x800px

>webkit

>>52573258
>>52573652

I'm sure there will be an extension that will remove the add.

>replaces ads with ads

>based on Electron
>written in JS
Right.

>>52575229
Whats wrong with webkit?

>>52573025
Based yan

File: 20150813_191210-2-1024x1024.jpg (190KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 1024x1024px

>>52573025
Is she one of us?

File: IMG_0791.jpg (597KB, 1100x1200px) Image search: [Google]

597KB, 1100x1200px

>>52572756

>mfw its this easy to troll /g/

You fucking morons.

>>52573025
>>52577128
Would wife

Who the fuck would think replacing ads with ads is a good idea?

>>52572756
>replaces ads with their own ads
Didn't some Eastern Europeans go to jail for making a crapware that changed google ads?

Sounds OK, hope it works out. The team looks pretty dank, desu.

>>52577128
I too share a passionate hatred for Oracle.

>>52577128
Yes

>>52573258
Well someone is not brave...

>>52573025
She is legit.

https://zyan.scripts.mit.edu/blog/

>>52573025
she looks 90 lbs soaking wet

>>52577345
>the personal blog of yan (@bcrypt)
Tried to follow her on Twitter but she blocked me wtf
I've never tried to follow her or @ her.

Does she hate grown up men pretending to be girls on the Internet?

>>52572756
>replaces ads with its own ads
Nope. That's malware behaviour, bucko. Just block it.

>>52573098
>>52573251
>>52573258
nice reading comprehension

>>52572790
this

>>52573098
>>52573251
>>52573258
>>52576251
>>52577148
>>52577922
it's like they never passed english class

>>52578121
No, I understand what it's doing. I just don't understand why anyone would willingly want it to do that.

>>52572756
While this browser will be no success at all, it will make enough conservative fanatics switch over from Firefox to Brave.

I agree with everything which damages Googleyahoozilla Chromeclonefox. Perhaps i install that and let it run constantly in background without actually browsing with it so they get a bit market share too.

File: 1444511997528.jpg (45KB, 540x625px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 540x625px

http://arstechnica.com/business/2016/01/mozilla-co-founder-unveils-brave-a-web-browser-that-blocks-ads-by-default/

>Brendan Eich, co-founder of Mozilla and creator of the JavaScript programming language, has unveiled his latest project: Brave, a Web browser that blocks ads by default then replaces those blocked ads with its own ads. Brave Software, the company behind the eponymous browser, will take a 15 percent cut of the ad revenue generated.

>>52572756
isnt still botnet, cause chromium

>>52579999
Better Botnet than using a browser which betrays their users for becoming as equal (as stupid) like Chrome.

>>52579999
And Chromium has almost no Botnet included, it is as clean as it can be.

>>52572756
>Free as in freedom
>dev team seems trustworthy, competent, and they all have good backgrounds

I'm interested in this.

File: aus0.png (78KB, 834x979px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 834x979px

Autists can't stand the fact that ABP allows "acceptable" ads.

There is no way they will use this browser.

>>52580227
Autists in general can not understand that people have to earn money for having a good living. Guess that guys are just robbing banks or robbing food for doing so, Autists are just lame content rippers too most of the time. They can not comprehend the fact that some ads can keep things the way free as they are right now.

And they can't see Brave will challenge the concept that pages are infested with tons of ads. Brave will deliver too acceptable ads while blocking the non acceptable ones, and as benefit, both site owners and users of the browser get something back for accepting few special chosen ads.

>>52580227
An AD BLOCKER having a concept of ACCEPTABLE ADS is like an ANTIVIRUS having the concept of ACCEPTABLE VIRUSES.

>>52580352
Well, not true, ads can make the difference that a page content stays free forever or not.

A Virus is always malicious.

>>52580346
No, you won't get my sweet sweet ad revenue, fucking asshole

>>52580382
An ad may or may not be malicious. Until the owner of the said site vets the ads, I keep blocking them. The few pennies they got for my ad impression is a lot less than my hourly rate for disinfection.

>>52573209
faget

couple things here-
most sites that rely on ads are shit. I really hope the ad supported business model does die, because it's the reason why we have garbage clickbait sites and why journalism has taken a nose dive in quality. for these sites, producing good content isn't a priority of theirs, the only thing that matters is generating controversy and emotionally driven sharing.

Mr. Eich's business plan is theoretically reasonable, though. relying on a cut of all replaced ad revenue is more feasible than donations and getting paid by google (your competitor) to be your default search engine. Of course the main issue being that more and more people block ads and don't want to see them, so it's silly having a browser dependent on people accepting that you'll force ads on a browser level.
Have any of Mozilla's ventures had any success besides FF and TB?

>ads pay for the server, forever
yea thats why websites disappear...

plus your shitty old argument is not going to change the fact disabling adblock is like telling viruses 'just fuck my shit up family'

File: 1439987171523.png (139KB, 400x398px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 400x398px

>it's just another chromium skin

I'm willing to pay money to Lord Eich 2bh.

Just to piss off SJWs.

>>52580599
where you're forced to view ads

>>52572756
>Inventor of JS
>Savior of the Web.

I disagree on so many levels.