What do you think of this, /g/?
>the ultimate privacy browser, created by a based anti-sjw
>ultimate privacy browser
that's not even close to correct though. It still profiles you and still sells you out to admen. It just takes webpage ads and replaced them with it's own ads that are still targeted to you, by a database they keep, just more loosely. This is not respecting my privacy. Respecting my privacy would be blocking all tracking and all ads, by default, with no whitelist.
its the typical neckbeard neet saying he wouldn't fuck a 6
... lost me there.
>From the man who made the shittiest, most easily exploitable scripting language that powers all the ads, annonymooouse skriptkiddies, and NSA haxors comes the newest way to take a cock up your ass...
>based yet again on fucking chromium
just fucking fork firefox already you cunts.
Meh, another vapourware browser. Not interesting the slightest.
>Using anti-trackers owned by ad companies who send "harmless Ghostrank™ metadata to us :^)"
It's a protection racket. "Hey, content publishers, it would be a shame if something were to happen to your ads... For 15% of your ad revenue I'll make sure my users see them." The only reason you think this is a good thing is because of the "SJW" angle.
This reeks of what Apple did with adding adblocking support on their devices at the same time as they were pushing their own content publishing and advertising platform that was exempt from adblocking.
What the fuck is happening with the internet? All the shit browsers is based on chromium or Firefox.
Fuck shit these companies and developers, which has no ability to create a browser with own engine!
More like chromium or chromium.
It's impossible to create your own engine, you have to copy what chromium does exactly, because shit "developers" (99.9%+ of web developers) only ever test on WebKit. At that point you might just as well use chromium and save yourself the trouble.
Ask Opera how the "independent engine" thing went for them. Even Firefox ended up emulating webkit-* prefixes.
you don't have fond memories of an ad-free online experience?
Guess I'm getting old. Nawww.. there are still people who put content out there as a hobby. Not everyone is whoring for view money.
This fag is selling out his future users, he should be completely against ads, it's non negotiable.
In the end he's just running a racket scheme to force click bait publishers into paying and giving them access to the users data.
dynamic + weak typing, dumb scoping rules, lack of any built-in concept of modules, all of which is sure to be fixed immediately when ECMAScript v213.4328429.234 is released right around the corner and given full uptake in all mainstream browsers any day now.
i mean i get that autists aren't so great with people or relationships. but how in the living fuck do you link a programming language to social justice
You literally only find this on /g/. Everywhere else in the real world, nobody complains about that.
It says a lot about the kind of people you can find on this board... Crossdressers, pedos worried about their data security and "privacy" under the guise of "freedumz", literal faggots and whatnot. Oh and their favourite language is C. And anime is basically their life.
>yan zhu will never compile Tor for you after cuddling
Lead Dev: https://ca.linkedin.com/in/bbondy)
It's going to crash and burn
>after removing ads from a webpage, Brave then inserts its own programmatic ads. It sounds like these ads will be filled by ad networks that work with Brave directly, and Brave will somehow police these ads to make sure they're less invasive/malevolent than the original ads that were stripped out. In exchange, Brave will take a 15 percent cut of the ad revenue. Instead of using tracking cookies that follow you around the Internet, Brave will use your local browsing history to target ads.
THE ULTIMATE PRIVACY BROWSER
I FUCKING SPIT MY DRINK