Brave Browser

>Publishers will get around 55% of revenues. 15% will go to Brave. 15% will go to the partner that supplies the ads. And, interestingly, 10-15% goes directly to the user.
>10-15% goes directly to the user.

Should have just named it AutismBux

>Browse the brave new world with the Brave™ new browser.

IBM & Bravedan Eunuch pls save the net

That looks utterly retarded

>Brave will be available on all the major platforms — Windows and OS X on desktop, and Android and iOS on mobile
Good to know that Linux doesn't exist.

>Eich's solution: A new web browser that blocks all adverts by default — and then replaces them with new ones.

No.

>The adverts that Brave display will be based on tags generated from the user's web browsing history

No.

>blocks all adverts by default
>replaces them with new ones.
bwahahahaha !!! - This will sink like a stone

>>52526991
God dammit, it's not April yet.

>>52526991
>Eich had donated to Proposition 8, a failed Californian ballot initiative that aimed to define marriage as between one man and one woman.

Prop 8 didn't fail, it won the vote and then some uppity faggot judge overturned it based on some dubious "hurt feelings" clause.

https://brave.com/

>With Brave, you can choose whether to see ads that respect your privacy or pay sites directly. Either way, you can feel good about helping fund content creators.

Looks like you can turn the ads off. Still trust it more than faggotfox.

>>52527656
There's a build for linux on the github.

https://github.com/brave/browser-laptop

>look at the github
>based on NodeJS and Electron
WOW ITS ANOTHER CHROME
THANKS

>>52526991
If he really made the Javascript, I don't trust him

>>52528974
At least it probably won't be as botnet as Chrome

>>52528805
>I do not understand how constitutional law works.

>>52529011
>I think marriage is a right

>get pay to look at ads

brb building brave™ farm

File: 1430109960398.jpg (417KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

417KB, 960x720px

FINALLY A NON-SJW BROWSER

>>52529120

It fucking is if it is a federally recognized institution, faggot.

Change marriage into something that has no legal or financial meaning and then you can define it however the fuck you want.

Juat realize that other people then will also be able to. That's would be evangelical marriage vs Catholic marriage vs judaic marriage vs muslim marriage, etc.

>>52529228
The federal government has no constitutional oversight over marriage, you dumb cunt.

>>52529120
>I think marriage should be state regulated
Fucking liberal, take your big government and shove it up your ass.

>>52529269
>liberals
>supporting state's rights

>>52527656
It said MAJOR platforms.

Wait, what percentage goes to the website?

>>52529354
>Publishers will get around 55% of revenues.

>>52529426
Publisher can literally mean basically anything.

>>52529436
no. publishers means the ones who publish it, i.e. the websites

Wait, can we download this now and help them find problems?

>>52526991
Even if it is adware..... It is not SJW, not Mozilla bigotfox.

And it is Open Source... i am already sold :D

>>52526991
https://github.com/brave/browser-laptop

Maybe the fucking shithead shouldn't have created JavaScript

God, things are as bad as they are because of him

>>52529309
>implying

>>52526991

I stand by Eich.

>>52530338
It's his fault that every fucking website now pulls in 3 MiB of javashit and runs slowly.

>>52529120
Equal treatment before the law is.

ayy lmao

he cuck'd out pretty hard when asked about the protests against his political views, "i-i-its going to be different this time"

No, no it won't. the sjw's run the show now

>>52529309
Hurf hurf hurf.

>>52526991
Finally... A real pro conservative and pro Christian and pro traditional values valueing browser project from a guy who cares!

Fuck the SJW world!

File: Screen Shot 2016-01-20 at 13.37.32.png (146KB, 274x334px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 274x334px

would you?

>>52530621
Maybe if she lost the fucking glasses.

>By default Brave will insert ads only in a few standard-sized spaces. We find those spaces via a cloud robot (so users don't have to suffer, even a few canaries per screen size-profile, with ad delays and battery draining).
>We will target ads based on browser-side intent signals phrased in a standard vocabulary
Sorry for being a retard, but what do these mean?

>>52530714
it means it's a botnet

>>52530751
No you moron, it does mean that Brave will not block every ads but instead leave ads alive which do support page owners and which are on Brave Software's white list.

You need to make money too you fag. Go back to your Bigotfox from Bigotzilla and shut the fuck up!

He should get the creator of PHP to join as well.

Then we would all have a project to laugh at.

>>52530327
Someone else would have built another language for browsers. Shit would be the same today.

>>52529247
Tax code gives breaks to married couples. Therefore there needs to be a federal definition, and oversight, of marriage.

Q.E.D.

>>52527694
That is incorrect.

Ads will be based on user selected interests.
Not browsing history.

That is pretty much the point: give users control over which ads they receive.

Seems cool. I really like the idea. And it's nice to see the guy not being too buttmad about the sjw nonsense.

>It "won't be huge," Eich says, but this will let users automatically make micro-payments to publishers they like. Brave will then block all the adverts on the sites that they choose to pay for.

>paying per website to hide ads
>microtransactions

Yeah sure, this will fix the internet alright

>SJWfox drama

>>52529247
>>52529269
>this much cognitive dissonance
Typical of /pol/

Pretty smart, everyone who realizes they could make more money with those microtransactions than traditional ads will shill this browser to their audience

File: 09708593693672.jpg (57KB, 586x438px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 586x438px

>>52526991
is this a brand new browser or just a firefox fork?

>>52531631
It's a new browser, but it's extremely seminar to Chromium.

So who is getting it? I'm on the fence.

>>52531692
Well sign me up I guess. I really miss chrome being a good browser.

Can Brave run Firefox addons, or what?

>>52531812
No, it will be independent of all existing browsers, so developers will have to port their extensions over to it.

File: Elissa_LADYBOSS.jpg (408KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

408KB, 900x900px

>>52528874
>Head of product
LEL

File: yan-zhu.jpg (26KB, 590x350px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 590x350px

>>52530621
Oh shit, it's that Tor dev from MIT. Why is she in on Eich's faggotry?

>>52530621
Are you kidding? That's 100% wife material. Would buy plane ticket for.

>When news of the donation became public, he was highly criticised, and ultimately resigned from the role.
That kind of makes me want to support it even though I have no problem with gay marriage I have big problem with him being fucked like that just because he has different believes than pop culture liberals

File: fixed.jpg (415KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

415KB, 900x900px

>>52532016
that feminine penis

>>52532224
No shit. I guess you weren't around when he resigned. Majority of people who were defending him were doing so strictly on his merit as a CEO and not on morality of recognizing gay marriage.
This "political correctness" is starting to smell like fascism.

>>52532224
Same here, fuck the sjw cancer. I hope this becomes a viable shitfox competitor. The way sjws have been ruining it into the fucking ground lately it's not too farfetched.

>>52527079
So I just have to write a bot to look at ads and I get free money? Sounds like a great idea to me.

>>52530368
The 14th amendment is being broadly over stretched to fit this case.

>>52530621
She's kinda cute IMO
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zlx4wOIejF4

File: Why_I_m_Antisocial.png (284KB, 765x524px) Image search: [Google]

284KB, 765x524px

>>52532319
Except... fascism isn't anything like liberal capitalism mixed with social economic terrorism.

>>52530621
>you will never have a gf that's immensely smarter and better than you at the things you're good at

Wonder what those smart and wealthy women find attractive.

>>52529001
>serve ads
>just give it time and someone will exploit
Just use Chromium then or Opera (if you don't like Jeewgle).

>>52532494
Chads, same as all women.

I like eich

>>52530368
Yes any man can marry a woman. It's equal for all men.

>>52530980
>Federal government chooses to incentiveize marriage, even though marriage itself is legally a state jurisdiction
>Therefore fags should be allowed to get married,.

>>52534162
It is either that or remove the federal incentives towards marriage, which you know will never happen. Use that brain of your man.

>>52534182
>A tax break is the same as redefining marriage entirely

>>52534193
Please point out where I said that. I'll wait.

>>52534211
Homosexuality is a mental illness.
Mentally ill people can't get married.

>>52534229
Come on, now you're just grasping at straws. We both know that mentally ill people can get married. It's how you were born :^)

>>52528999
/thread

How much money does the average ad cost?

How many ads would I need to see to make enough to live off?

>>52528805
mormons made the vote win, but it was overturned as an unconstitutional law. ie, it's against freedom.

>>52534262
I'm a completely different anon than
>>52534193
Homosexuality is a mental illness, possibly developmental, and many people have recovered from it. It's unfortunate that the viable and good natured companies that try to offer those solutions are shunned and sometimes shut down.

>>52531004
If you select no tags will you get no ads?
If not, into the trash it goes.

>>52534539
>citation needed
Please. Show me at least 10 published, peer reviewed papers in any languages you desire.
I'm subscribed to every publisher (through work) so go crazy.

>>52530878
>I WANT TO BELIEVE IT'S NOT A BOTNET BECAUSE FUCK SJWS HURRRRR

>>52534784
It was never validly removed from the DSM and the APA is no longer a valid source for review of sexualities.
http://www.behaviorismandmentalhealth.com/2011/10/08/homosexuality-the-mental-illness-that-went-away/

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/former-president-of-apa-says-organization-controlled-by-gay-rights-movement

They used terror tactics and subversion to remove it from the list, and then fifth cloumned the entire organization.

If a bunch of skitzophrenics took over the organization and declared themselves all "perfectly healthy and normal and anyone who says differently is a bigot etc." Would that be all right with you?

Why would I even want microtransaction for adblocking when I can just install firefox or a chrome clone and use ublock?

>>52532344
hnnng

>>52526991
>A new web browser that blocks all adverts by default
Cool.
> and then replaces them with new ones.
uhh...

>Publishers will get around 55% of revenues. 15% will go to Brave. 15% will go to the partner that supplies the ads. And, interestingly, 10-15% goes directly to the user.

So basically he's creating a platform where he creates a monopoly by removing other middlemen and forcing himself as one?

Didn't... Didn't microsoft get sued (and lost) for some similar shit like a decade ago?

>>52531800
Chromium...

>>52535268
hes going to pay me?

>>52535762
seconding this anon

what the fuck, if this is legit...

>>52526991
>He's the creator of JavaScript and one of the founders of Mozilla, the organisation behind the Firefox browser
>so he knows a thing or two about the web.
> creator of JavaScrip

No, he destroyed the web.

File: 1411295290853.jpg (44KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 300x300px

>>52535784
yeah dude if we aren't complete retards and misunderstanding then fuck freedumb gimme that sweet dosh.

>>52534977
> lifesitenews

Topkek

>>52530621
That profile pic was hilarious. Doubly so because she looks like a former coworker.

>>52530903
Or it'd all be in Flash.

>>52531868
Depends if it keeps Chromium's extension code.

>>52535889
Follow both sources faggot.
There are multiple news sites.

File: mfw.gif (667KB, 480x272px) Image search: [Google]

667KB, 480x272px

>15% goes to the user
its a brave new world /g/

>>52528999
Trips speak truth.

>>52528974
Into the trash it goes

>>52530327
That motherfucker is responsible for JS? Why is he alive?

so does 15% actually go to me in the form of money I can spend on whatever or is it just for the fucking microtransactions to nuke specific ads?

this is important

>>52534341
>>52532931
>>>/r9k/
>>>/r/4chan/

>>52535889
Nice counter argument, faggot

>>52537071
>Publishers will get around 55% of revenues. 15% will go to Brave. 15% will go to the partner that supplies the ads. And, interestingly, 10-15% goes directly to the user.

>It "won't be huge," Eich says, but this will let users automatically make micro-payments to publishers they like. Brave will then block all the adverts on the sites that they choose to pay for.

So basically it's like using AdBlock and whitelisting sites you like.

>>52527079
Is this real?
Sign me the fuck up.

>>52532337

This shit was tried to death in the late 90's early 00's with NetZero and other "Ad bars" that paid users back for looking at ads.

>>52534977
Unmedicated manic depressives are allowed to marry. I don't really see how this is supposed to work as an argument against gay marriage.

>>52537071
>>52527079
>>52537133
>Publishers will get around 55% of revenues. 15% will go to Brave. 15% will go to the partner that supplies the ads. And, interestingly, 10-15% goes directly to the user.

>It "won't be huge," Eich says, but this will let users automatically make micro-payments to publishers they like. Brave will then block all the adverts on the sites that they choose to pay for.

It's like writing a donation check in your name to a charity.

>>52537224
Ok, yeah, but if I choose NOT to make any of those payments, do I get the money, or what?

>>52537240
No. You get funbux to give to whoever you want. Doesn't translate to actual money.

>>52537253
well fuck that then

>>52526991
>won't block all ads, will in fact let some ads through

FUCK. DAT.

>>52530337
Oh I'm sorry, I didn't realize people installed browsers onto their headless Linux servers, you know, the place where Linux market share actually matters.

It isn't remotely a major desktop platform. Get over it.

>>52526991
speaking of adblockers
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/comodo-uadblocker/hhnkmoijlinhobdagnchdhogdmedamce

Is this okay?
It's a fork of uBO (uBO is released under the GPLv3), so any code must be published.

If you just download the extension and extract it, you have the source, but do they actually need to publish it somewhere?

>>52537181
Are you saying mentally ill people should be allowed to marry?
And you're cherry picking now.
Other arguments are absolute moral opposition, and that it is a very hazardous lifestyle

>>52537224
Well that's still nice, it's like an idea I've had in mind for ages.
Every time you see a page you really like, send the creator some cash.
But with this, everyone gets at least half the revenue, then you can dump the rest on the few sites you really like.
I actually like this.
>>52537253
>>52537265
Oh anons, you're not thinking hard enough.
Just go to your own site and give it to yourself.3

>>52534539
closet faggot detected

>caring more about other people's sexual orientation than creating/discovering something that will advance a science or art

>caring more about your own sexual orientation than creating/discovering something that will advance a science or art

>being this fixated on something as crude and basic as sex, when compared to for example discovering a great vaccine, or a mathematical proof

>>52537319
I don't think it's going to work that way.

>>52537358
None of this is but a giant deflection for the topic on hand.
I happen to be very interested in medicine and psycology. If by "closet faggot" you mean remediated, then yes, I went through a phase.
I'm glad I just didn't buy into the "be a giant flaming faggot" part of it. I just thought I was attracted to a male, now I am relatively bothered by it.

Now, if you want to ask yourself those questions; you can see how you're hypocrisy.

I care because, what if it is my child, or my family member, or a friend that falls into this reckless, hedonistic lifestyle.

File: 1433811751940.jpg (32KB, 330x378px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 330x378px

>>52537358

>>52526991
>http://www.businessinsider.com/former-mozilla-ceo-brendan-eich-launches-ad-blocking-web-browser-brave-2016-1?op=1


Can I throw money at this?

>>52537432
>>>52537358
>None of this is but a giant deflection for the topic on hand.
>I happen to be very interested in medicine and psycology. If by "closet faggot" you mean remediated, then yes, I went through a phase.
>I'm glad I just didn't buy into the "be a giant flaming faggot" part of it. I just thought I was attracted to a male, now I am relatively bothered by it.
>Now, if you want to ask yourself those questions; you can see how you're hypocrisy.
>I care because, what if it is my child, or my family member, or a friend that falls into this reckless, hedonistic lifestyle.
You're still a faggot

>>52537471
I have a longstanding girlfriend since highschool and soon to be my wife.
I don't have any physical attraction to men, and I am working my third year of college.

Bite me faggot.
Sorry you got so booty blasted over facts and history.

>>52536626
>Depends if it keeps Chromium's extension code.
But it's not a Chromium fork. It's a completely independent browser, why would it use Chromium's extension code?

>>52536703
News site =/= source.

>>52534977
Your first 'source' literally states 'alternative perspective' in the sub title. It also states without evidence any valid points nor does it contribute any substantial individually attained studies.

The second is a joke.

Try again.

>>52538027
Try harder
>>52538057
Both of your "points" are conjecture.
Try again.

>>52535812
Hipster startups took it too far and destroyed the web. But if it werent javascript, it'd be flash, or some other shitty nonsense

javascript itself is ok

license?

>>52537638
From TFA:
>It's based on Chromium, the open-source software behind Google's Chrome browser, and will itself be open-source.

Or,
http://venturebeat.com/2016/01/20/brave-browser/
>That said, Brave is based on Chromium, the open-source web browser project at the core of Chrome. The Brave browser also uses Electron, a tool used inside GitHub’s Atom text editor.

The question is how much of Chromium it retained.

>>52529228
In the end Edge and IE11 are the most friendly and ad free browsers. Where were you when Windows saved the web?

Bump while I get it running.

File: Screen Shot 2016-01-21 at 9.23.32 pm.png (122KB, 731x463px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 731x463px

Say what you want, I like how it looks

File: Screen Shot 2016-01-21 at 9.24.08 pm.png (441KB, 971x602px) Image search: [Google]

441KB, 971x602px

Well, it handles webm's fine.

File: Screen Shot 2016-01-21 at 9.27.50 pm.png (83KB, 981x600px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 981x600px

It ran instantly whereas firefox took ages on my machine.
You'd expect a browser by the guy who made javascript to be good at javascript.
Still, that top left corner.
Bit of a giggle.

>>52529120
http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html#a16

Nice to know that /g/ is still full of libertarian retards.

Marriage has been an institution between men and women for all of human history.
So saying "same-sex marriage" is an oxymoron. You might as well talk about a downward rise or wet fire.

The equal protection under the law clause does not apply, because homosexual men are just as free to marry a woman as heterosexual men are. They've always had the same right to marriage.

>>52540900
tl;dr

If they release a desktop version I'll care, I rarely do any "surfing" on my smartphone to be honest.

File: Screen Shot 2016-01-21 at 9.57.07 pm.png (309KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

309KB, 1366x768px

>>52541027
Motherfucker what am I running now?

>>52540975
gays are gay

>>52540828
Acid is fucking stupid. It only tells which browsers bothered to go out of its way to complete the test. It still might suck in real-word cases.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid3#Criticism

>>52541083
Top kek that fucking Back button. Is it the same idiot responsible for making the ridiculous big Back button in Firefox?

>>52541083
Also wtf is with those tabs (and general UI). Looks like babby's first page navigation made in Flash circa 2001.

gay marriage doesn't exist

>>52541479
>>52541461
>Looks like babby's first page navigation made in Flash circa 2001.
It makes me feel nostalgic.
I guess this is what happens when you write a browser in fucking javascript.

>>52541747
>It makes me feel nostalgic.
Me too, in a way.
But that doesn't change the fact that it looks like absolute ass.
I would NEVER use that piece of shit no matter how good it was.
After all, my web browser is my most used application and I would be forced to look at that atrocity for most of the day.

>>52535050

This a thousand times

What's his argument as to why people should use this instead of chromium + adblock?

>>52542629
Maybe some people would pay for quality instead click bait articles nested 50 pages deep

>>52541083
The browser is written in js?