>4600Mbp's _WIRELESS_ routers already available for consumers,

>>52524419
fast wifi is a meme. it doesn't exist. they keep making up these crazy numbers, but in reality, it won't even go above 1 MB/s.

>>52524453
/thread

>>52524453
Don't be retarded, I get around 30MB/s, almost as fast as my flash drive.

>>52524453
>fast wifi is a meme
>can wget a file at 5.5MB/s, same as my wired

You're lying

>>52524453
This. It's 4.6 gig shared between ALL connected clients, assuming they all have compliant wifi cards, are in the same room and there is zero interference. Which happens never.

>>52524487
if you only get 5.5Mb/s wired, you're doing something wrong

>>52524542
Download speed, obviously.

>>52524453
This, my so-called 450Mbit/s wireless can't even compare to a simple fast ethernet connection.

>>52524557
OP is clearly talking about a LAN situation where you're only limited by your hardware. Even on my shitty hardware I get 60MB/s down from my home server.

>>52524419
>4600Mbp's _WIRELESS_
>practically half 10G without a wire


And another faggot fell for another memay.

File: 1386437282255.gif (793KB, 360x203px) Image search: [Google]

793KB, 360x203px

>>52524419
Why do neckbeards hate wireless so much? Because it's not useful for internet backbones? Because your fifteen year old WRT54G running open sores firmware shits itself all the time and you erroneously assumed that it's as good as it gets?

Yet another example of people who claim to love technology yet consistently misapply it in every aspect of their lives.

>>52524907
Because wireless is shit when you're running a home database for more than 2 people.

>>52524453
B8, I get 110mbps down and 20mbps up on my 5g router. I pay for 250mbps down and 20mbps up.

>>52524925
>home database
What the fuck does that even mean? If you're running a database server with actual performance and uptime requirements it should be in a data center you dirty neckbeard. If it's something for personal use there is no reason it shouldn't be perfectly usable over a wireless network unless it's badly designed or your network is fucked up because you're still using that WRT54G.

>>52524992
It means I serve a bunch of people and those people don't like pulling large files off the LAN at below mechanical disk speeds.

>>52525048
In other words, your misuse of technology is everyone else's problem
>hey guys guess what touch screens are really hard to program on therefore touch screens are a jew scam!
This is you

>>52525150
What are you talking about? I can't let my people try to pull files over the network and let them wait 10 minutes for it finish, that's terrible business and would just make ME look bad.
10G is needed, and even that can get bottlenecked if 3-4 are pulling at the same time, 1100MB/s isn't a whole lot of bandwidth for multiple users.

>>52525244
>I have a requirement that wireless doesn't fulfill therefore who needs this newfangled technology? stupid kids and their flash-in-the-pan trends, this will go away any day now so we can get back to our 2400 baud modems and floppy drives like in the good old days grrrrrrr
Nobody is going to take your wires away, luddite

>>52525297
It's pretty clear wireless is inferior to wired in any metric, so there's really no need for a inferior technology to exist and spend money researching it, is there?

Think for a bit.

>>52525314
>my requirements are the only metrics that exist
>the meatspace isn't real guise! I only need my anime body pillow!

>>52524419
>implying 10gbit consumer internet is a thing
>implying up to 4600mbps means you'll get that
>implying 4600mbps wireless routers are cheap