>AMD (NASDAQ:AMD) today announced revenue for the fourth quarter

should I sell now and take a small loss or are things gonna get better :^)

>>52514877
Everything is going smoothly then. It's almost time to buy in. They will take a modest loss in Q1 2016 and a small loss Q2 but will return to profit after that. Everything points to AMD stabilizing once they get their new products out while they continue to get money from the consoles APUs.

Dammit AMD will you stop dying every week already.

AMD better change its logo to phoenix because that's the only explanation how they keep dying and reviving every quarter.

>>52514877
It's time to buy guise.

>>52514877
>loss equals bankruptcy
Nice b8 m8, I r8 it 8/8.

>implying nvidia didn't report net income down by 82% and diluted earnings per share down by 79%

See? I can make a company look like a failure too on a board of people that don't know what that means.

>>52514973
If Zen pulls through, they may as well change the logo to Keller.

File: 1434579669318.jpg (192KB, 720x814px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 720x814px

I don't know why intel/nvidiafags love hating AMD so much

if AMD falls under, there will be no competition and intel/nvidia hardware prices will go up because monopoly. Also, the technology will stagnate as there will be no reason for them to keep pushing performance increases.

>>52514989
Intel/Nvidia users on /g/ are mostly children, they don't think much at all.
The adults using them don't even bother with these threads.

File: 1470068519491.jpg (696KB, 1846x1923px) Image search: [Google]

696KB, 1846x1923px

>>52514989
>Also, the technology will stagnate as there will be no reason for them to keep pushing performance increases.
Yeah, and already seeing this happening as AMD struggle to keep up. Especially with in Intel.

I bought in at 2.09 WHY AM I SO FUCKING STUPID?

>>52514952
>will take a modest loss in Q1 2016
>implying we're not currently IN Q2 2016
>confirmed for know nothing faggot.

Q1 2016 was 31/10/2015 to 31/12/2015 breh.

>>52515035
>financial advice from NEET weebs on anime image board.

There's your answer.

>>52515029
Who the hell makes these things???

>>52515078
Those who wish death upon the Holy People.

>>52514989
If AMD goes under, the US Gov't will split Intel up.
They almost did it once, they will damn well do it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Micro_Devices,_Inc._v._Intel_Corp.

File: 1409105211656.png (134KB, 580x540px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 580x540px

That's certainly better than Q1 2015 ($180 Million net loss). AMD must be doing something right.

Hang in there you fuckers, you still have to launch Zen.

I bought TSLA when it was at $25/share and sold all of them because I didn't think it was going anywhere.

After that I gave up on that shit.

File: keller is doom.png (827KB, 920x533px) Image search: [Google]

827KB, 920x533px

>>52514986
the "K" in K12 stands for Keller

>>52515044
are you retarded or can you not read?

>>52514877
Wasn't their plan to lose money throughout 2015 (Due to R&D) and start turning a profit in late 2016? Seems like everything is going to plan.

>>52515027
Adult here
I do bother with these threads

>>52515329
Well it wasn't really a "plan" it was a forecast, the FAD went over these details. Polaris is supposed to land sometime in the middle of 2016 which should improve things somewhat then Zen lands toward the end of 2016(or beginning of 2017 if all hell breaks loose).

>>52514877
>2016
>not knowing at all how capitalism works

AMD as it currently is may be finished, but the brand isn't going anywhere. Worst case scenario they go bankrupt and someone else buys their assets. Being the only effective competitor to Intel on the X86/AMD64 market, and the major competitor to NVidia means that there are a lot of other, better run companies who would like to get their hands on those assets. Or AMD may manage to turn itself around. Either way, it's far from over.

>>52515609
Just physical age doesn't make a proper adult.

>>52514986
>he believes only 1 person works on cpu design

>>52516278
Adult means literally physical age of 18

>>52514877

No.

Intel will invest in them to keep them float.

Microsoft did the same for Apple.

Keller is back working at Apple.

A10 is supposed to be where the iPad Pro gets IPC parity with a Skylake Core i3 and the Iris Pro 6200. It'll be the rout of the century

>>52514877
Time to buy. When zen and HBM2 hits, stock price will triple.

File: image_7.jpg (140KB, 625x540px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 625x540px

>>52516557
Doesn't matter if it can't run x86 programs without a huge bottleneck.

File: 1433537492670.jpg (268KB, 920x1029px) Image search: [Google]

268KB, 920x1029px

What do they do when an unrestricted monopoly finally crushes the competition this hard? There isn't even a third option.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/9976/amd-reports-q4-2015-results-and-fy-2015-earnings

>Net loss of $102 million, loss per share of $0.13, compared to a net loss of $197 million, loss per share of $0.25 in Q3 2015 and non-GAAP net loss of $79 million, loss per share of $0.10, compared to non-GAAP net loss of $136 million, loss per share of $0.17 in Q3 2015.

AMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT

>>52516557
Hopefully in a few years when AMD has turned itself around he'll get hired back to make a new core to replace Puma

>>52516692

Intel steps in and invests in AMD.

Same thing happened to Apple; Microsoft saved their ass.

>>52516557

The iPad Pros success is a sign that as long as the apps that can do the work they need done get made or existing x86 ones ported, no one gives a flying hoot about architecture. Legacy eventually stops being a draw.

>>52516692
An x86 monopoly can't legally exist you mega retard.

You're also forgetting AMD has intel by the balls because AMD owns the AMD64 license. Intel's itanium was a piece of shit that died. It should have never even existed in the first place, intel must have been smoking a metric ton of crack when they thought it was a good idea to break compatibility with 32-bit x86 operating systems.

>>52516692
They force them to branch out in to millions of small companies. Look at Bell

>>52516875
Who's "they"?

>>52516892
The j00z

>>52516908
Jews Don't Let Jews Split

>>52515129
AT&T got split up, and look what we have these days. Garbage, nearly as bad as when AT&T was an absolute monopoly. Competition between telcos in cellular and internet markets is artificial in the best cases.

>>52514980
That's what I'm kinda thinking, where do you think the floor is though?

Implying Microsoft won't step in and buy AMD out.

>>52515078
>NEET weebs on anime image board.

>>52515029
I'm still waiting for my free snowboard. Maybe AMD will let me win a new bicycle.

>>52514877
Opening a eTrade account right now. Buying if (when) that shit goes below 1$.

>>52514909
buy more if you're in the slightly risky mood

sure, it could drop to 1.00~ but i think it's likely to stay in the 1.75-4.00 range that it has been for about 4 years now

>>52517680
Hoping for 1.00 by Monday so I can buy 500 shares.

>>52514877
How much did that make for tax purposes?
Cause fuck what their balance sheet says, that is misleading.

niggers gotta look at their tax information, that will show if it's going under or not.

>>52514989
if AMD falls someone else will buy it, most like likely Realtek, those chinks have enough money to buy both AMD and Nvidia not to mention that their chipsets are virtually in every motherboard and the chinks have been wanting to make CPUs for a while now.

AMD dying it's would probably be the best thing that could happen in this decade.

>>52514952
>Everything is going smoothly then. It's almost time to buy in. They will take a modest loss in Q1 2016 and a small loss Q2 but will return to profit after that. Everything points to AMD stabilizing once they get their new products out while they continue to get money from the consoles APUs.

Pretty much nails it.
Assuming AMD pulls out all the stops for ZEN i see nothing but high stock prices and competition to intel

File: mfw.jpg (39KB, 540x720px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 540x720px

>net loss of $102 millions

>>52518329
Considering net loses were almost $200 Million for Q1 this is an improvement to be honest.

>>52518136
At the very least you're guaranteed to see a value spike before the release of the next lines of hardware.

>>52514952
>It's almost time to buy in.

i'm already up 20k on amd. buy whenever it goes under $1.70 and set a trailing stop when it hits $2.00

>>52514877
Hope they turn a profit in 2016.

>>52514952
>>52515044
>>52518136
>>52519127
Where do you buy shares

I got money but I'm clueless

>>52514952
>It's almost time to buy in.

I checked them around closing time. My thoughts exactly.

>>52519138
What happened to that console gig? They're developing APUs for the xbone AND the piss 4.

>>52518381
100M is 100M
>>52519370
AMD are incompetent, they don't make money with the console deal

>>52514989
>no competition for a niche market with extreme costs

0h no....
who cares again?
manchildren?

>>52516676
why would you want to run software compiled for an inferior arch?

even better, who gives a shit about the arch?

>>52519857
Anyone who has a laptop.

>>52519149
/biz/

Scottrade, etrade, optionshouse, robinhood.

just put in an order for 1000 shares, wish me luck

>>52519889
Inferior? How is an angry birds processor "better" than x86 beside power consumption?

>>52514877
>not even a billion USD revenue

>>52516278
That is what she said.

AmdPoorfags on full damage control

Apparently no one on /g/ knows how the fuck the economy works, or what "operating loss" and "net loss" mean.

>>52520220
Dozens of posters on /g/ seriously think that the value of a company, the operating business, facilities, and IP are only equal to its trending stock value.
This board is filled with high school dropouts.

>>52520220
>2015 Q4
>$197M net loss
>2015 Q3
>$200M net loss
...
>360M net loss
>660M net loss
>403M net loss

They never make shekels

>>52520336
>2015 Q4 $100M net loss*

>>52520220
>>52520267
Can you elaborate how these numbers are good please :3 ?

>>52520220
Your point?

>>52517997
AMD pays almost nothing in taxes because they don't have any profits to tax. Looking only at taxes isn't a good way to analyze a company because tax is calculated on a cash basis instead of accrual.

File: cuck.jpg (136KB, 560x570px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 560x570px

>>52514986

> If

>dumbfucks fall for intel viral marketing
>screw over the best processor company
>cry that amd is dying while typing on their shitmachines powered by jewtel
You did this /g/.

Posted from my AMD powered PC.

>>52521129
>amd suck
>blame jewtel

>>52521202
>suck
Oh look, a dumb kid that fell for jewtel's lies.

Fuck off, child.

>>52521239
>don't like facts
AMD cpus are good for what vs the jewtels ones? Slower, hotter, muh cores (modules(

File: radeon-technologies-group-technology-summit-polaris-presentation-12.jpg (335KB, 2999x1687px) Image search: [Google]

335KB, 2999x1687px

>>52521239
>tests, benchmarks
>lies
Even AMD don't use their own CPU with the Polaris test...

File: 1453260450836.jpg (237KB, 1280x725px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 1280x725px

>>52521239

this
>>52521297
same for the quantum project

>>52521337

>same for the quantum project

That is because there are no ITX AM3+ boards that can handle a 9590. Project Quantum is dead anyway as nobody was willing to build the thing for AMD.

>>52518079
That is assuming someone will buy them as a complete entity, and not just parts of them - or at least their CPU and GPU subdivisions as a whole, and then also deciding on keeping a high R&D on x86 and/or its repective GPU market - they could very well just hold the patents and sell more APU memes & Low-end products.

This whole AMD getting bought by some big company meme isn't as easy as many of you fags want to think it is.

>>52515129
>US Government
>Splitting up anything

Yeah, we've seen how good this worked in the past. :^)

>>52519857
>niche market
>What is video/media editing
>What are high-performance Servers
>What are most Supercomputers
>Inb4 muh ARM and MIPS

Fuck off Freetard

>>52514877
>>52516709

>Le finish le bankrupt meme

>>>/v/

To be honest though, I think this year is it for AMD. With now losing 28% of their revenue to 2014, they have to deliver with Polaris and Zen. I don't think they'd be able to stand their ground anymore if any of these two is not going to end up competitive. Their revenue is even below Nvidia's now.

File: 1203515936723.jpg (12KB, 240x240px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 240x240px

>>52514877
Finally it's all over.

File: 1453191562628.png (40KB, 220x191px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 220x191px

>>52514973

I've been considering investing a couple thousand Euros in AMD shares, hoping that Polaris and Zen will be big successes.

Should I?

>>52515027
No even adults are pron to this,it's just until it effect them that they start caring.Example one of my professors hates intel to hell after seeing them being scum firsthand in the 90s yet buys nvidia cards because the drivers work to play his Civ 5 or total war in class,he went on saying that AMD be worse than nvidia because microsoft gives nvidia a free pass with certification with drivers and doesn't for AMD so AMD has to pay which is probabaly why drivers take forever.

>>52522998
I can relate to that prof.

AMD CPUs work well on my Linux system.

AMD GPUs don't.

At 2014 - Q4, AMD needed $1.57B to be at zero (no loss, no gain).
In 2015 - Q3, AMD needed $1.22B to be at zero (no loss, no gain).
In 2015 - Q4, AMD needed $1.01B to be at zero (no loss, no gain).
As long as we do not include interest from debt which is now around $50M per quarter.

If AMD got $2B in revenue in 2014 - Q4, they would make $0.57B profit.
If AMD got $2B in revenue in 2015 - Q3, they would make $0.78B profit.
If AMD got $2B in revenue in 2015 - Q4, they would make $0.99B profit.

>>52521239
LMAO, dat delution

>>52522998
is he some kind of arts professor?

File: 1402672130637.jpg (32KB, 450x354px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 450x354px

>bought at $1.9
>didn't sell when it was $3
Polaris better kick ass.

>>52523187
>Polaris better kick ass.
Nvidia going to use maxwell for laptops q2 2016, i'd sell nvidia now.

>>52523174
No he was a degree in mathematics with some Computer science emphasis and worked in IT with networks,read some where he set up some of the first LAN in campuses in the US,so he isnt a dull guy in the slightest.

>>52514877
The laws will protect AMD