Got my 980 GTX /g/, did I do good?

>>52511739

390X or fury Nano are better, the first even cheaper, and you could have waited for, you know, 2016 cards.

>>52511819
Hello amd shill.

File: you-dun-goofed-inception.jpg (28KB, 500x313px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 500x313px

>>52511739

>>52511819
AMD is a good consideration if you don't mind the occasional driver crashes.

>>52511915
390 here, what crashes are you running old drivers ?

Ya did good. They scale really well in sli when you need more power down the road.

>>52511915
Oh boy, it's 2010 again!

>>52511915
380 here. Bought one about a month after release. Zero crashes so far. Same for my old 6850. Same for my even older 4850.

What the fuck are you talking about, Nvidia shill?

Would a 390 be good enough for 1440p? I want to replace my gtx 760 but I don't have a lot of money.

>>52513124
yes if you turn off goywerks

>>52512993
>amd drivers haven't progressed since 2010

Sounds about right

>>52511739
>980gtx
>not infinitely superior higher-number 9800gtx
git gud

>>52514260
That's only 1 order of magnitude better.

>>52511819
>the rebranded 290x is better
wew lad

>>52513311
b-but we got a shiny new toy called Crimson which is super sleek and pretty except for the advanced features

>>52514260
this, op you fucked up

>>52511819
He does have a point, 980 series is literally outdated tech yet still retailing at full price. You should have waited for new shit that will be released in few months.

>>52514608
it's sad that the AMD rebrands are better than nvidia's new stuff but it's the truth.

>>52514720
For the price? Yes, but top of the range nvidia is still better.

>>52514748
nah. Xfire scaling and the FuryX is watercooled for the same price