What can we do to encourage more women to get into a computer

File: 4L_c6WhA24O.jpg (308KB, 2000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

308KB, 2000x1000px

Women need to be told to be women again. They should be home looking pretty, making babies, cooking, and cleaning.

>>52467492
this

>>52467492
This.
Mellinials have to be the hero generation
Or we are all fucked

Make computers easier for them.
Oh is that condescending? How about we do nothing then. Oh that's even worse.

>>52467492
God, this so much

File: 3TY3Aya.png (100KB, 1254x261px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 1254x261px

>>52467492
This
>inb4 some whiteknight cuck or buttmad women comes in

>>52467492
But this'll drive wages up as the workforce shrinks
DISASTER
COSTS THE ECONOMY BILLIONS

>>52467397
Either they want it or they don't want it. It makes absolutely no sense to encourage women to "a computer related field". This shit only costs money to advertise it.

>>52467397
You don't they have a choice to do what they want

>>52467397
Dumb it down until there's no point in hiring anyone to do it.

>>52467545
It probably would be better because:
1. It creates jobs that were done by women.
2. Raises the population and helps to fight off sandniggers.
3. Would help to reestablish people as community and not people as selfish individuals as they talk and have a relationship with their mother instead of the kindergarten.

>>52467545
>workforce shrinks
Have you tried to find a job recently? There are so many people looking that retarded shit like the question in the OP is being taken seriously.
Remove women from the workforce and all the men who got passed over will fill the positions naturally while they're at home raising the next generation and probably fucking the Amazon delivery guy on the side.

File: 4L_dTQ8Qe8s.jpg (36KB, 720x480px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 720x480px

>>52467397
The feminist agenda has made life worse for us all.
>increased competition in the work force, men actually need jobs to be accepted by society, women just need to look pretty. Women taking jobs away from men leads to increased crime rates and social instability.
>dual income families are now mandatory, women joined the work force but men weren't allowed to leave it so now both parents work and strangers raise our children
>feminists perpetuate the lie that women can have healthy babies on their 30s and 40s when the reality is that women who give birth after the age of 25 begin to exponentially increase the likelihood of autism and other birth defects

Enjoy your blue haired rad fem dyke civil union relationships and your autistic children you cucks.

File: 1449461086243.jpg (34KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 400x400px

>>52467397
bait/10

>>52467397
I don't get this meme

There are plenty of women at my work. (big big company)

In fact my manager is a woman, and she has worked for Dell, Google and Sun Microsystems.

File: 4L_rIfUV1UL.jpg (104KB, 362x750px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 362x750px

>>52467713
How many dicks did she suck to get that job? She should be at home raising her children instead of being a corporate whore.

>>52467669
You don't get it. The excess of labour to jobs causes wages to be low, and if that changes, wages will skyrocket, cutting into the capitalist pigdog's bottom lines.
It'll turn the labour pool into a worker's market, causing a fucking economic disaster for my swiss bank account

>>52467725
Youre very, very insecure

Doing something to make them join the field would be sexist. Teaching kids about tech could make a difference and would help our society.

>>52467727
And the real arguments will contain: If wages increase because women stay at home, it means jobs will be outsourced more to china and indians.

Americans need to be competitive with chinese wages if they want economic prosperity.
Yes goys, I mean guys, sacrificed yourself for the economy, so I can buy another yacht I mean help people with capitalism.

File: 4L_QmJtn2s8.jpg (32KB, 299x448px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 299x448px

>>52467751

I suggest doing nothing and replacing diversity programs with a purely meritocratic system that does not take race or gender into account in any way.

>>52467796
But this would mean there were less women because of sexism and patriarchy

Yes merit is sexist

File: 4L_nbv9pLwd.png (399KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

399KB, 960x540px

>>52467796
>but anon, meritocracy is problematic

http://readwrite.com/2014/01/24/github-meritocracy-rug

Feminists hate meritocracy because they know they can't compete by merit alone.

>>52467836
When did we start talking about feminism?

File: AbeOik6.jpg (3KB, 160x160px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 160x160px

>>52467786
>Anyone who isn't a frothing-at-the-mouth crazed MRA is a white knight
How fucking retarded can you get

>>52467863
Feminism will come up whenever the arguments against merit based systems appear.
To justify female failure in merit based systems, they have to invent feminists things like sexism and patriarchies to explain the discrepancy without being contradictory. For example; without sexism then pro-women things to get women coding implies that women need the extra support because they're worse at it.

File: tumblr_n2fnh83gGR1qksk74o1_500.gif (182KB, 450x338px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 450x338px

>>52467397
The dumbassery in this thread is pretty much why computer fields are male dominated

What female wants to join the field and deal with this much gender insecurity and all-around idiocy

File: 4L_eZBOMLqK.jpg (69KB, 550x454px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 550x454px

>>52467887

>>52467891
Do you just have a folder of these that you post when you can't think of a reply that addresses the posts arguments?

File: 1451076922925.jpg (85KB, 600x677px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 600x677px

>>52467492
>>52467677
>>52467725
>>52467786
>>52467836
>>52467891
>filename
could you make it any more obvious that you're samefagging you faggot?

>pic related it's you

>>52467887
>females can't handle the banter

File: 1230795688981.jpg (23KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 250x250px

>>52467875
>using MRA as an insult

>>52467912
>not knowing what samefagging is

>>52467951
>i'm unable to read the filename of the posts he quoted
please kill yourself already

File: 4L_pXDw8dCV.jpg (157KB, 1536x1025px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 1536x1025px

>>52467912
Pic related it's you

>>52467972
here's your (You)

>>52467969
He can post multiple times in a thread if he wants to.

Samefagging is when you're pretending to be multiple people.

>>52467983
>expecting women to know the definition of samefagging

>There are plenty of women at my work. (big big company)
>In fact my manager is a woman, and she has worked for Dell, Google and Sun Microsystems

So does the cleaning-lady.

>>52467397
>What can we do to encourage more women to get into a computer related field?

Why do you want that? What would you like to achieve by doing so?

>>52467397
If they don't want to go into that field then let them go wherever they want.
Sure feminists bitch about "muh wage gap" and "STEM and computer-related fields are sexist" but in reality they could have any job they want so long as they took the time to gain the necessary qualifications and skills.

>>52467677
Holy shit, when you say it like that, Huxley was right...

>>52467509
This is unfortunately true

Add sandwich assembly procedures to the software development process.

>>52467397
shout it too them

>>52467397
nobody should be encouraged to do anything. if a woman wants to be a computer scientist, let her. if a woman wants to be a navy seal, let her. but for the love of cock, just don't have gender-specific requirements. let the best man/woman do the job.

>>52467397
Why would we ever want to do that?

>>52467796
What is this!? A sensible suggestion, in muh women-in-IT meme thread!? GTFO!!

> few weeks ago
> Ask my mom if she's a feminist

> "I hate women"

File: 1411414742385.jpg (62KB, 848x941px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 848x941px

As far as I'm concerned, that only thing you need to be a good programmer is a sufficient amount of autism. Men are inherently more autistic.

File: dZvK8F1.png (458KB, 600x630px) Image search: [Google]

458KB, 600x630px

>>52467397
>What can we do to encourage more women to get into a computer related field?

Nothing. Stop saying shit like this and they will automatically assimilate, if you keep considering women as some special human beings who need to be spoon feeded they will never assimilate to the terch industry, see all the bull shit that happens when you try to forcefully assimilate them.

Who is interested will find a way themselves, who isn't interested just LET IT GO.

>>52467713
>big big company
Affirmative action, I bet you also have some token blacks in questionable positions.

How many asians make up your staff, by the way?

File: cockswan.gif (1022KB, 399x163px) Image search: [Google]

1022KB, 399x163px

>>52467677
>autism

Give evidence or no deel

>>52467397
Each has its own preference/hobby/etc. You can't convince someone to do something they do not enjoy.

>>52467492
>They should be home looking pretty, making babies, cooking, and cleaning.
Are you retarded?

>>52467492
fucking this

>>52471437
Stay mad, a woman is a mans property.

>>52471749
Not sure what kind of fetish videos you're watching, but you should stop doing so.

>>52467397

>2016 in the Year of our Lord
>Using a 2007 survey to represent reality today

Go fuck yourself, femanon.

>>52467397
They can if they want.
Why is it always the women's studies majors who complain about not enough women in STEM fields?
What don't you understand about equality of opportunity not resulting in equality of outcome?

>>52471070
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/autism-maternal-age/

>It is common knowledge: As women get older, pregnancy becomes a riskier enterprise. Advanced maternal age is linked to a number of developmental disorders in children, such as Down's syndrome. Now, a study has confirmed that older mothers are more likely to give birth to a child with autism, too.
The authors of the epidemiological study, published February 8 in Autism Research, examined the parental age of more than 12,000 children with autism and nearly five million "control" children between 1990 and 1999, all living in California. The researchers found that mothers over 40 had a 51 percent higher risk of having a child with autism than mothers 25 to 29, and a 77 percent higher risk than mothers under 25.

>>52469026
>let the best man/woman do the job.

Although to be honest, I don't think this has ever been the case in any place I've worked at. The person who gets the job is never the BEST person who applied, but usually the person who gets there because they have more years there, have a better relationship with the higher ups, or some other boon that is really totally unrelated to their ability to actually do the job better than everyone else.

This >>52469026
I don't give a flying fuck what reproductive organs you've got, all I care is whether you'll assist or hinder our efforts to do what needs to be done.

>>52472529
>Although to be honest, I don't think this has ever been the case in any place I've worked at.
Or perhaps your definition of
>best person for the job
differs from the higher ups'.

We're on 4chan, so I'll just go ahead and assume that you believe interpersonal skills are irrelevant in IT/SE jobs.
>protip: that is not true