Is there a difference between R9 Fury X and the Nano besides

One is small the other is smaller

>>52411143
>liquid cooling a nano.

For what fucking reason?
Also remember, olthe Fury X is watercolors from the factory, not the standard Fury.

Fury X has better power delivery, and may be binned for higher clock speeds vs nano being binned for low TDP with lower freqencies.

File: deepcool-liquid-cooling-psu-front-100637555-orig.jpg (224KB, 1000x823px) Image search: [Google]

224KB, 1000x823px

>>52412392
>>52412392

>Not liquid cooling everything possible

gtfo

>>52412433
I understand this but the Nano is probably on par with RBpi+ watwrcooling. Unless you're unlocking it to reach fury X levels like some have done, why bother?

File: Screenshot_20160114-004753.png (658KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

658KB, 1440x2560px

>>52411143
You can buy a non reference 980 ti for $500~$530 now. AMD can't compete.

>>52412488
>going kikeware

>>52412500
?

>>52412488
more likely 540~660

>>52412488
>buying something shit
Nope

>>52412433
Out Any part in a PC, Why would a PSU need water cooling?
Good quality ones never get that hot even under 100% load.
Whats next, a case with water cooling?

File: butwhy.jpg (85KB, 1224x918px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 1224x918px

>>52413690

>>52413816
I was thinking about a fanless case with liquid to cool it instead.

File: Mineral_Oil_Submerged_Computer_1.jpg (199KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 1000x750px

>>52413822
Just posting random crap really. Considering how ridiculous it is seems quite a few people did the mineral oil thing.

>>52412433
>liquid cooling high voltage parts
What could possibly go wrong?

>>52413690
There exist water blocks for ram, hdds, ssds, and I've even seen a custom block for a fucking optical drive. The people stop at nothing to make their machine the most "uber" thing ever made.

>>52413690

Quieter running
Reducing number of parts that will fail (In a 100% Liquid Cooled system, with Solid State Drives, the only moving part is the Pump)
Higher Efficiency
Easier to control where waste heat is ejected (Since it's all centered around the radiator/pipes)

Next, we'll probably see water cooling on RAM/VRMs come into play more, given the increasingly higher clock rate of RAM and VRM efficiency being stressed more. And we'll probably see water cooling for SSDs become a thing as "overclock" SSDs becomes a thing in the future (Someone'll eventually release an SSD that gets "hacked" with custom firmware to allow overclocking chips/circuits/etc. in them, then the SSD overclocking era will begin).

>not having a water cooled sound card

>>52413878
But is easy to understand those.

Overclocked ram gets hot, HDDs too, not sure about SSDs.
But a PSU?

>>52412488
The cheapest 980ti i can get in my 3rd world eastern european shithole is 800 euros lol. Keep in mind we also make like 500 euro a month with a decent job. I fucking love being a yurofag..

>>52413894
>the SSD overclocking era will begin
It will become myth as no records of it will exist.

>>52412392

i have a Nano, and the reason to watercool it is:

the default fan is noisy.
the card throttles.

the reasons NOT to watercool the card is that it doesnt OC well because it cant get enough power since it only has 1 8pin plug.

but from my experience. undervolting the card actually made it way way better.

it was cooler, more silent and performance loss was like 150 points in Valley.

>>52414122
Thanks, quite informative. /notsarcastic

>>52413894
>An SSD that can run so fast, it can pull up the program you want to open the moment you think about it.

Christ

>>52413877
>he doesn't know distilled water is an insulator

>>52413822
okay, fanless case, and a cooling circuit, maybe a radiator. how do you plan to cool the liquid?

>>52414837
>You have no idea about electrochemistry.

>>52414837

not that guy, but if you think distilled water stays like that for very long, you are in for a treat.

but watercooling the PSU isnt dangerous.

its useless, but doable

>>52412392
Because it looks cool.

File: 1338634061342.jpg (89KB, 590x518px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 590x518px

>>52413903
How can you suffer such life?

>>52413690
For the last time: water cooling is not about better cooling, but doing it more silently and with less rapid temperature variations.

>>52413903
Polecuck

Just get both

File: 1280.png (982KB, 700x1009px) Image search: [Google]

982KB, 700x1009px

>>52415027
He can cool it passively if the radiator is huge enough.

>>52414837
>he doesn't know that water will readily pickup fucking anything and quickly become conductive in a metal contact enviroment

>>52411143
For rice: Nano since you'll have to have a custom loop anyways
For ease: Fury X

>>52413867
a few questions:
how viscous is mineral oil? is it thin enough to convect heat away from things like VRMs in a setup like this?

how flammable is that shit? isn't mineral oil basically just kerosene with slightly longer alkane chains?

>>52414837
>he doesn't know about autoprotolysis

>>52418958
I'm not previous anon and not a water cooling enthusiast, but isn't there some sort of attempt to maintain a common ground across the metal components in a loop?

I would have though that galvanic corrosion from different metals would have been the bigger problem.

>>52412392
>For what fucking reason?

Because the Nano is now signficantly cheaper than the Fury X, is the exact same chip and can be easily overclocked to the same speed as an overclocked Fury X once you raise the power target.

>>52411143
I don't understand how people could have much interest in the Fury or the Nano at this point in time.

Their Polaris-based successors will be here in 6-8 months and obsolete them so thoroughly it won't even be funny.

> 2x bandwidth (1024 GB/s)
> 2x to 8x more memory (likely 8GB std, 16GB for $$$)
> 2x rendering capacity, plus first substantial update to GCN in years
> same TDP
> DP 1.3, HDMI 2.0
> h.265 10b UHD whatever en/decoding for muh chinese cartoons

The last time a generational jump as big as this happened was in 2002 with the Radeon 9700 Pro.

>>52420770
It seems to work pretty well, there were a few supercomputers using a similar system with a much bigger reservoir.

It's not going to ignite unless you do something full retard. I'm no chemist but google implies the flash point is over 330 F

>>52413896
Underrated post 10/10 would kek again

>>52420908
Because I want it now

>tfw wanna watercool everything

>>52420908
>The last time a generational jump as big as this happened was in 2002 with the Radeon 9700 Pro.

9700 Pro was 10-20% faster in normal games than previous gen. The only reason it ended up great was because it had extremely good shader support, which the Geforce line did not, and in games that used shaders it actually was up to 100% faster.

I'd say the HD5000 series would be a better analog for the Polaris cards - used new node, had up to 2x performance in all legacy apps.

I've a feeling that Polaris will end up better than Pascal, especially regarding HBM usage, since they managed to already demo that while NVidia didn't.

>>52413867
Do you even need a cpu heatsink in a mineral oil PC?

>>52425189
>9700 Pro was 10-20% faster in normal games than previous gen.

that was kind of the worst-case scenario, like low resolutions where systems were already mostly CPU bound anyway.
and it wasn't just shaders where the perf roughly doubled, it was any heavy use of AF/AA, which you had to enable sparingly in previous gens since they tended to murder frame rates.

>>52413816
>ALL THAT CONDENSATION
This triggers me.