Why aren't you using a Pentium 3?

File: drake.jpg (75KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 640x480px

>>52404650
>Pentium 3

So, is this the latest may-may?

File: dead badger.jpg (398KB, 1529x2419px) Image search: [Google]

398KB, 1529x2419px

>>52404650
Why aren't you using a dead badger?

>>52404650
i am using one

512megs of ram and a purpose lol. i use the isa slot for testing shit i cant afford new ones of

posted on my P4

File: 500px-Intel_Pentium_II_Processor_Logo.svg.png (40KB, 500x660px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 500x660px

>>52404650
Because I don't need more than 2.

>>52404650
Why aren't you using a z80?

until last week someone used a P3, and i'm sure there are a lot of people who are using P3's around here ...

look at this thing! look at what i found on a PC that was "slow"
>>52406216

but OP the i series are derivatives of the P3 series

File: 2k15.png (44KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 2048x1536px

Because I'm using a Pentium 4

>not using a Intel 8086

>>52407955
>tfw bought a first gen P4 and it was slower than the P3

>>52408225
The only thing they were really excellent at was SIMD/FPU performance iirc, last time I benched this thing it got matched or slightly edged by a P3-933.

In some of the unoptimized benchmarks I ran it barely outperforms a 400 MHz mobile Pentium II, even under in some cases.