Does anybody know if screenshotting an etextbook is bad?

Seeing how I have zero moral compass, no, I would give no fucks doing it. You shouldn't either.

>>52392187
i just dont want to say the magic p word
in fear of you-know-what

Its probably technically against some rule or law, but I highly doubt anyone will come after you to enforce it

>>52392168
If bad you mean illegal, it is theft if the book would require money to obtain.

However, the website will never know you've screnshot.

>>52392168
Is it bad? No.
Are you allowed to do it? Probably not.
Should you do it anyway? Definitely.

>>52392237
the etextbook trial is free for a week so I technically wouldnt have it on my account after that

OP Here anybody got a script that can screenshot, save said shot, then turn the page, repeat for so many cycles?

>>52392277
And after that one week trial expires, still having it in your possession is theft.

However, the only harm to anybody is a slight lack of gain by the author. Up to you and your morals.

>>52392311
I mean im not distributing it by any means and ill probably delete it after im done using it

>>52392359
Justify it to yourself, not me. I'm a pirate, you can be too!

>>52392299
Write your own? It probably takes 5 minutes tops

Posting this on 4chan was bad

but you still did it.

>>52392168
That's a moral question without an objective answer. That being said, the textbook industry is run by a bunch of kikes who collude with colleges to Jew you out of as much money that they possibly can, so I'd say it's immoral to pay for it. Screenshot away.