Is the 980ti able to power the Oculas Rift?

>>52372760
Only for the next six months, when Nvidia will cripple it at a driver level to make way for Pascal.

Of course, you can just upgrade then like a good goy. :^)

>>52372760
Thought the recommended requirements were 970 and up? Did you Google it?

>>52372777

Whats a google?

>>52372760
> can the 2nd most powerful consumer graphics card Nvidia makes run this thing I want to use?

Of course it's powerful enough you dumbass, what the fuck would you use if it couldn't?

>>52372977
>what the fuck would you use if it couldn't?

SLI...

>>52372996
> falling for the SLI meme

>>52372760
No, it's not.
The TI stands for Totally Ineffective. Get a regular 980 instead. Or even better, get a 970.

File: database.png (18KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 512x512px

>>52372772
memes

>>52373014
SLI seems like it should work though, right? You could have one card per eye. Although I guess nothing will be coded or optimized that way, or the eyes could get out of sync and be really disorienting, so its probably not worth it.

>>52373057
Nope, there's no driver level code for per-eye rendering, it will be entirely down to the devs.

I pretty sure 99% of them will not waste their time knowing that there's no driver framework at all from nvidia/amd meaning they would have start completely from scratch.

i cant believe i caught a warning for shitposting the other day, yet this thread still exists.