idea

>what would stop me, a man (my first name could be for a male or female), from just dressing up like a woman in an interview with a tech company?

self-respect? dignity?

>>52357575
the fact that any company that hires based on quotas will have terrible employees which you will have to work with on a daily basis?

>>52357685
As if that matters? Money, nigga

>>52358036
they would sue you for misrepresentation

>>52357575
imo do it pal

>>52358095
how can they prove that you aren't 'gender fluid' or whatever term to describe this sorta thing? No way would they sue someone who they thought was transgendered for 'misrepresentation', that'd be pr suicide.

>>52358274
You would have to have past employers / your friends / family members lie for you and say that you have been doing it for a while

otherwise state in the interview that you just started

>>52358345
uh, they couldn't bring that shit up in an interview because gender and sexual preference are protected classes. if they even asked you a question about that stuff then they are in legal doo doo.

so what if i come in there and look like caitlyn jenner (aka a man in makeup)? are they going to assume i have a penis? and that i'm just doing it to get the job? nah, cause if they ever did that and were wrong, the sjw's would destroy them, and they know this.

>>52358400

>>52358095
>they would sue you for misrepresentation

I am talking about if they sued you, The attorneys would do a background check

stop putting these horrible ideas in my head.

there are plenty of them

they're just so ugly you mistake them for men