[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Home]
4Archive logo
Daily reminder that Mozilla is run by SJWs
If images are not shown try to refresh the page. If you like this website, please disable any AdBlock software!

You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology

Thread replies: 106
Thread images: 22
Daily reminder that Mozilla is run by SJWs
Daily reminder that you can't name a better browser than Google Chrome
Daily reminder that Firefox is dead and you should shift to Chrome
In case someone gives a valid argument for using Firefox counter his arguments by frogposting

Old thread seems to have died
>>
There are a few firefox=sjw threads here, kill yourself
And chrome is literally botnet
>>
>shilling
>for free
>>
>>52323069
This thread is meant to combine all those threads into one
>>
This thread is so cancerous I installed Firefox and Thunderbird to boot.
>>
File: 200.jpg (45 KB, 275x282) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
200.jpg
45 KB, 275x282
>>52323041
Also in case someone says Chrome is botnet, call him a Pedo
In case someone recommends an optimised version of Firefox that they say is faster than Chrome counter him by green posting
>using 'insert first word'meme
or by saying
>using sjwcode
(In case they say Google is a bigger SJW than Mozilla again use frogposting to counter him)
If someone complains about Chrome's RAM usage counter him by calling him Poorfag
>>
>>52323069
Pedo detected
>>
File: 1388337360995.jpg (140 KB, 960x720) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1388337360995.jpg
140 KB, 960x720
>>52323041
> SJW

social justice ADVOCATE, please.

warrior is a trigger for some
>>
Firefox has qt lolis though.
>>
surf
>>
>>52323172
Using SJW fox and bird
>>
Google is miles worse SJW corporation than Mozilla tbqh

In addition to being SJW headquarter of the world, Google also spies on people and eliminates free internet.
>>
File: enjoy-faggot.jpg (11 KB, 261x168) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
enjoy-faggot.jpg
11 KB, 261x168
>>52323220
>>>/r/eddit
>>
File: dance-pep.gif (80 KB, 248x203) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
dance-pep.gif
80 KB, 248x203
>>52323284
>Google
>sjw
>>
It's time mods must delete any posts that has Firefox and SJW in a single post. They are just cancer threads made by Google fanboys to spread FUD
>>
>>52323041
>hurr durr my choice is superior to your choice
>oh my, thread seems to have died
gee, i wonder why
>>
>>52323284
Firefox is literally cancer SENPAI. No company will use donation money to remove slave from documentation
>>
File: hippies.jpg (202 KB, 1056x705) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
hippies.jpg
202 KB, 1056x705
>>52323580
Have you read the thread. This is obviously made by a Firefox fanboy who is buttmad because of the three of six hurr durr Firefox is sjw threads that we have at any time
>>
How does Firefox being run by SJW's affect me in any way?
>>
>>52323643
In no way. Just people buttmad that they are using stuff made by people they hate
>>
>>52323643
you should be anti-sjw fighter if you want to be cool on /g/

so, are you with us or against us? just remember, we do not forget we're anonymous
and legion
>>
>>52323041
>using firekek
>not using superior palememe
>>
Daily reminder that Firefox has better animu than Chrome and that is a good enough reason to never switch.

Stay mad Chrome fags.
>>
how exactly is Mozilla run by SJWs
>>
Where does vivaldi sit in all of this?
>>
>>52323041
>in case someone gives a valid argument, frogpost

Nice to know I should hide this thread
>>
>>52323041
>Holo thread
I'm in
>>
>>52323041
>Daily reminder that you can't name a better browser than Google Chrome
Mozilla Firefox

/thread
>>
File: 1452299233584.png (1 MB, 1920x1200) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1452299233584.png
1 MB, 1920x1200
This is now a Holo Thread
>>
File: 1452240277851.jpg (712 KB, 1500x1000) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1452240277851.jpg
712 KB, 1500x1000
>>52324203
This is now a Maki thread
>>
If there are any Firefox=SJW threads please redirect them to this thread.
>>
>>52323041
>2016
>using google for anything
Welcome to the botnet.
>>
File: 1451730038700.jpg (244 KB, 1846x1212) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1451730038700.jpg
244 KB, 1846x1212
>>52323041
>0.05 shillings have been added to your account.
>>
>>52324745
See
>>52323631
>>
>In case someone gives a valid argument for using Firefox counter his arguments by frogposting
Uh, was this some sort of shill instruction you slipped by accident?
>>
File: 1441309837418.gif (1 MB, 320x240) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1441309837418.gif
1 MB, 320x240
>>52323194
I like what you're doing here.
>>
Chromium is better!
>>
>>52323041
There are still good versions of Firefox.
There are no good versions of Chrome.
>>
>>52324203
Holo? More like Whoro amirite
>>
>>52324896
Carlos, is that you?
>>
>>52324884
Non Fisher price botnet
>>
>>52324986
D: NOOOOOO

But muh open-source! Google can't do it's evil if it's open source right?
>>
>>52325017
Vanilla Chrome with proprietary parts removed. Open sourced botnet is still a botnet
>>
I really can't understand how Firefox switched from being the savior of browsers to running after Chrome's tail. What happened?

I remember using it back in 2010, when it was still in 3.6 or something, and now we are on version 40 or something?
>>
>>52325443
WebKit happened
>>
>>52325508
FUCK
>>
>>52325522
Atleast it didn't become Chropera
>>
>>52325508
The only reason it became popular was because of Google's advertising. Before that it was only used by KDEfags and Macfags
>>
I love firefox mainly because it reminds me of Holo the wise wolf, even though she's a wolf.

What I don't understand is chrome proved fast browser is chosen over pretty much anything else, why are they still doing updates that slow it down? How are these getting approved?

Also, is there actually a logical choice for browser? All of them have serious downsides.
>>
>>52325573
There is,Chrome
>>
I gave up on life and have gone full blown normie with tech choices now. Products, software, whatever. My mood is better these days
>>
>>52325632
>google
Enjoy your botnet.
>>
Why should I care what the devs think? Firefox just werks.
>>
File: esr.png (58 KB, 620x292) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
esr.png
58 KB, 620x292
Only reasonable choice.
>>
>>52325632
Can you make Chrome use your RAM as a cache yet? Last I checked Chrome still never cleared its cache and so you'd have issues like 56GB of your SSD being used just by Chrome's cache. I don't need to worry about any of that with Firefox or any of its forks.
>>
>>52325632
But I hate google. And I try not to support their endeavor to monopolize the personalized ad market.
>>
>>52323041
As someone who recently switched to Chrome after using Firefox for 10+ years, I have to agree that it is much better.

Really the only thing holding back Chrome in the past was the lack of good ad-blocking, but uBlock Origin takes care of that now.
>>
>>52325714
Explain how it's better. I'm a Chrome user that switched to Firefox and I could never go back.
>>
Interesting, I have only recently moved to Firefox from Chrome and I really enjoy it. I left firefox when it got bloated and shit and returned when it got fixed (around the time when Australis was introduced)
>>
>>52325722
>Explain how it's better
It's just so much faster and more responsive. Firefox would slow to a crawl and start freezing up with too many tabs open, whereas Chrome never does that.
>>
File: 1329148270827.jpg (72 KB, 750x563) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1329148270827.jpg
72 KB, 750x563
>>52325736
>it's faster
>therefore it's better
>>
>>52325736
I literally have the inverse problem. Chrome, even a clean install, regularly freezes up when I have more than a couple of tabs open. After switching to Firefox (Aurora channel if that makes a difference), the only problem I've ever encountered is that occasionally Youtube misbehaves, but that's not really an issue for me.
It just feels better in general to use Firefox.
>>52325752
You shut up, how is a slower browser better?
>>
At least in the new era of browsers I know what I bought all that RAM for.
>>
I use tor.
>>
>>52325764
By having Vimperator and TreeStyleTabs.

The chrome replacements for those are shit because they can't hook to the interface properly and do all the keybindings they really want to.
>>
>>52323041Micosoft. Edge > chrome> ff
>>
PALE MOON
A
L
E

M
O
O
N
>>
File: firefox.png (588 KB, 1552x854) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
firefox.png
588 KB, 1552x854
SHAME SHAME SHAME
>>
Chrome doesn't even properly support mouse gestures, and over half the extensions is malware dusguised to look like popular extensions.
And OP is a faggot, as usual.
>>
>>52325847
>>>/v/
>>
>>52325836
So you tolerate an experience that you agree is inferior because of an extension? I just don't get it.
Why not make your own for Chromium?
>>
>>52325907
Why are you linking to /v/
>>
>>52325925
He's just mad cause his computer can't run games
>>
>>52325924
Why not make it for Chrome then
>>52325925
Only /v/ level retards uses stock meme
>>
>>52324028
Vivaldi is a Chromium fork, so it sits next to Opera.
>>
>>52325924
>Why not make your own for Chromium?
Ha, not gonna work. Chromium extensions are partially jailed, they can't do half as much as Firefox extensions.
>>
>>52325934
Jokes on you I uses Windows 10
>>
>>52323041
>Daily reminder that you can't name a better browser than Google Chrome
Chromium.
>>
>>52325924
>>52325954
If that were so easy there would have been a NoScript plugin already
>>
>>52325954
>Why not make it for Chrome then
What? You do know that they're the same thing, right?
>>52325965
Oh, really? I didn't know that. I assume there's no way to get around that?
>>
>>52325974
God
I love this meme
>>
>>52325990
Apart from editing the source code, no. For example, extensions are not allowed to change the user interface, whereas XUL (Firefox) does allow that.
>>
>>52325836
I actually prefer Tabs Outliner for Chrome than TreeStyleTabs. Firefox just breaks at around 100 open tabs, stops rendering things properly. In Tabs Outliner I can just save and close them (they still remain in the tree view). Also, Firefox becomes really slow at around 50 tabs (especially when you open a few tabs for loading at the same time).
I'm also considering getting some minimalistic browser (like surf) and writing some tree-view wrapping for it. Haven't written any real program yet so I guess something like that could be a good practice.
>>
>>52326041
*to TreeStyleTabs
>>
>>52326041
What a pain for nothing, just save them all as boormarks and feel free to close them.
>>
>>52326041
Maybe YMMV. Reason I switched back to Firefox was Chrome slows my computer when there are more than ten tabs
>>
>>52323973
This
/thread/
>>
>>52325924
>So you tolerate an experience that you agree is inferior because of an extension?

My experience is better because I have the functionality that I want. It's not hard to comprehend really.

>>52325990
> Oh, really? I didn't know that. I assume there's no way to get around that?

Jesus Christ, you really are stupid. What part of "jailed" don't you get?

>>52326041
> Firefox just breaks at around 100 open tabs

No, it works fine. There's Session Manager for storing and loading tabs.
>>
>>52326060
I'm just too lazy to use bookmarks. I can just save them in one click while preserving the view. All my tabs in one place.
Anyway, do bookmarks even preserve tree structure?
>>
>>52326105
Just restart Firefox, doing so will unload all tabs from memory, they keep tree style and will be reloaded when you activate them. There is no restart button, but it's possible to make one via keyconfig, FireGestures or Menu Wizard.
>>
>>52326095
No, it doesn't work fine at all for me. It starts rendering black rectangles everywhere and becomes really unresponsive. Tried to fix it, but couldn't find a working solution.
>>
>>52323041
Nice marketing faggot.
>>
>>52326095
Oh, you're just a cunt; I thought you were actually somewhat intelligent. You acknowledged that your browser of choice is less efficient at browsing. Most people would say that having an objectively worse experience is the inferior option.
>What part of "jailed" don't you get?
The part where you didn't explain yourself. The word "jailed" has numerous colloquial meanings so you'd have to be an idiot to act like there is only one way to understand the word.
>>
>>52326149
Yeah, I still use Firefox for the tabs I use on daily basis and Chrome for researching stuff. Restarting it and wait for 30 tabs I was just using in the session to load is too annoying.
>>
File: 1452102064440.gif (3 MB, 450x400) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1452102064440.gif
3 MB, 450x400
I just want a browser that doesn't shit itself when I have 30 tabs open.
Firefox can handle it sometimes but suddenly wants 60% cpu power.
>>
>>52326276
>anime
Opinion discarded
>>
>>52326295
There wasn't even an opinion.
>>
idk it's pretty fine for my use and didn't get any problems. i could try chrome but why
>>
>>52326276
Try upgrading your toaster.
>>
>>52326357
Not him but
>6 core CPU
>Firefox lags when loading a few tabs at the same time
What demands an upgrade here is the browser.
>>
File: 1452348474211.gif (1 MB, 450x400) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1452348474211.gif
1 MB, 450x400
>>52326276
I could not help but notice your gif was not optimized anon.
I have optimized your gif.
Your gif is now optimized.
>>
>>52326388
That's a bit of a different situation from your computer simply struggling to deal with having 30 tabs open. That said, I haven't really noticed Fox lagging too much when opening multiple tabs.

4 cores, 50 tabs, about 5% cpu usage here. Only time it really goes high is shitty script-infested sites.
>>
>>52326393
t-thanks.
>>
File: 1392550320357.jpg (243 KB, 604x527) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1392550320357.jpg
243 KB, 604x527
>>52323041
>"Mozilla is run by SJWs"
>Sucks Google's dick
Get a load of this shill.

Daily reminder that Google is the top SJW company out there:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7o7R5BgWDY

Also, use IceCat if you don't like FireFox, fagget.
>>
>>52326569
What a delusional video. No one exists in a vacuum, their actions will affect things beyond themselves. That's why tolerance and acceptance cannot exist, we all have desires, and most humans are unintelligent and built to form groups and fight each other.
>>
>>52326569
whers the "scat porn" searches though
Thread replies: 106
Thread images: 22
Thread DB ID: 383330



[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Home]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at [email protected] with the post's information.