>>52256004 The new Zen APUs are expected to have the graphics capabilities of a 270x. They're also have HBM. So maybe right now they aren't comparable to DGPUs but in time they will take over low/midrange and DGPUs will only be for enthusiasts.
For low-medium 720p gayming? Sure, but that's about it. The best bang for the buck APU right now is the A8-7600 ($80) and anything with better specs does not significantly improve fps (bandwidth starvation).
Also apparently AMD is going balls out with the Zen APUs and will include HBM on the dies or allow motherboard manufacturers to solder on some. We should be getting at least R7 250X performance on an APU soon.
I have the A10-5757m and i can play mostly anything at 40-60fps at 720p with medium to high settings or 30-40 at 1080 with low to medium settings with 1600mhz RAM. I've seen that there's appreciable increases in performance with faster ram but unfortunately my Acer V5 has 4GB soldered to the board and then an open slot which I've put in 4GB. The ram on the board is only 1600 so nothing i put in the slot will increase speed nor can i lower latencies. :(
Still, i swapped the display with a 1080P IPS panel and its awesome for media, web, light gaming and just a dd laptop.
>>52257612 The biggest bottleneck with APUs is slow as balls ram, which is way slower than gddr5, and no matter how many shader cores you added to the APUs, they would never improve. Intel has gone the route of adding eDRAM on the chip, AMD will use HBM.
>>52260222 >Also a dual-CPU motherboard for gaymen is completely unnecessary. Thanks m8. Someone suggested that to me and I thought it was a good idea for some reason.
>Because AMD's instructions-per-cycle is ass so they need to run their CPUs at ridiculous clock speeds out of the box. That's a shame. I want to stick with AMD since Intel backdoor memes, and AMD is pushing for open source more than Intel is.
>>52260305 They just focused on the wrong things with Bulldozer/Piledriver. They're great CPUs if you're doing multithreaded work and don't want to shell out the cash for an i7, but most games aren't optimized too well for more than 4 cores.
>>52257918 >>52257538 My phone can run that, realistically you'd want to aim for 720/1080(1080 is pushing it) @ 60 to not cause damage to your eyes. From one anon to another though, it's not worth it just yet to get apus, not even zen can bring that power just yet.
>>52256142 My a10-6800k and it's integrated video + 8gb ram play borderlands 2 at max settings 1080p 40-60fps, gta 5 medium settings 8x multisampling 1280x720 at playable 30-50fps. Pretty good for $70 apu. Where is your god now, Moishe?
Guys, I'm scared. Intel's integrated graphics seem to be catching up with the APUs. I'm still buying the next APU laptop when it's upgrade time, but lately I worry that AMD will go under because of intel beating them at their own game...
>>52260589 AMD's IGPs still have more raw compute power, they're just heavily bandwidth limited. intel has a superior memory controller, superior cache structure, cache cells too for that matter, and their high end Iris Pro chips are using a big slab of high speed eDRAM to feed the IGP with adequate bandwidth.
The 8CU in Kaveri/Godavari would outperform intel's Iris Pro chips if you could give it fast enough memory. Their future Raven Ridge APUs have HBM on package, and the IGP is significantly larger as well, so intel will once again be very far behind in IGP performance.
They're fine for light gaming, as in Doter, Legal Legends or even CSGO and some older AAA <2012/2013 run fairly well, or at least ok. Well, you can also reduce resolutions to 720p and actually crank some details up.
>>52256378 Don't fall for the A10 meme. See >>52256998 , albeit you can play some less demanding (online) games at 1080p easily.
>>52257612 It could work with some on-die HBM memory. The PS4 iGPU isn't far from a 270X in performance. :^)
>>52260789 >Zen and HBM might take things a notch up. No, it's going to rape intel. That a8 apu is already shitting all over the skylake igpus and the only competition it has is the igpu on the broadwell processors (which intel stopped making).
640-768 gcn cores with 128gb/s hbm is going to fuck intel's shit up so hard they'll have to give most of their income to companies to encourage games devs to run games on a single thread more than ever to stay relevant. Zen won't have the same ipc as skylake or kabby lake but it will sure have a batshit crazy powerful iGPU.
Interesting times are ahead of us. intel has had it easy for too long.
Its going to be bigger than that, likely 14CU or more. 20CU moderately clocked would only have a slight memory bottleneck with 1 HBM module, and there is no technical hurdle in featuring an IGP this size. AMD did it for Sony with the PS4 and its operating inside of a 100w envelope as a 28nm part. 14nm Raven Ridge with 4 Zen cores with 20CU could easily fit within 150mm2. They'll totally lock down mobile graphics, prebuilts, and all in ones. Nothing they've ever done has had this much of a competitive lead.
>>52261191 I want to believe, but in all likelyhood even if AMD knocks it out of the park and has products that smash Intel at every price point Intel will pull its old dirty tricks and force their stuff on the market. They'll pay a few billion down the road to AMD so they barely stay afloat but in the mean time AMD will have lost years worth of R&D that could have helped them compete.
The only hope for the x86 market is for Intel to be broken up into separate companies. Chip design, chip fab, and x86 licensing.
>>52256004 Best value is an a8 7600. Get it and overclock the fsb, then overclock the gpu. Idk about prices where you are but it's 40-50 dollars cheaper than an i3 here and should be good enough for light gaming. Battlefield 4 1080p 40+ frames per second on medium, or turn it down to low for even better performance.
>>52261468 >Intel will pull its old dirty tricks You mean how they purposely gimped programs compiled with their compiler on every processor that wasn't an intel, so they could claim stuff ran better when it was them selling snake oil?
>>52261468 Intel can bribe the shit out of OEMs, but as far as OEMs are concerned what matters most is profit. If a certain product appeals well enough to consumers that its going to fly off shelves then intel wouldn't be able to pay them enough to keep it out of market.
>>52262655 OEMs will be really interested in Zen especially the laptop APUs. They could chuck together a "gaymen" laptop and sell it for mad dosh. This would greatly improve battery life and give users an iGPU that could run even the most recent games on low 1080p settings.
This could be it fellas, the desktop might soon be on suicide watch.
>>52263045 Bruh, Zen will have 40% ipc over carrizo (aka excavator) and Zen will be on 14nm lithography. This means that a 2.7 GHz quad core Zen chip will have the juice of a ~3.6 GHz quad core carrizo. So the lower clock speed, use of 14nm lithography, and overall better power efficiency means a quad core 2.7GHz zen with a 12CU could have a TDP of around 25 watts.
I want to believe, but I doubt OEMs would be so kind to AMD. They don't see the APU as an APU, but as a processor with an igpu, just like Intel. Carrizo had the chance but they fucked it up by limiting it to 15w. I would love to buy a zen apu hybrid cfx laptop since it'll be amazing value for performance, but if zen isn't designed to be 15w then it's just going to cripple it, just like they did carrizo.
>>52263703 I see what you mean. Yeah the 15w tdp limit is dogshit even for zen. OEMs could remove that restriction if they removed the optical drive and gave the extra space for another battery or a larger existing one.
I mean the 15w tdp only exists because battery life is dogshit if the cpu has a higher tdp. The solution is there but I'm not sure if OENs are ready to scrap the optical drive for good.
>>52264066 >I mean the 15w tdp only exists because battery life is dogshit
Its actually a matter of form factor. A 15w chip needs a much smaller thermal solution. AMD's big problem is still most vendors putting their chips in bottom of the barrel systems with stupid single channel memory configurations.
>>52264662 They look good in marketing photos, same reason why people fap over thin smartphones. Aside from fitting better in a pair of faggy slim jeans, everyone agrees that a thicker phone is easier to use and hold. The thinner device just looks cooler.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org with the post's information.