Daily reminder that self driving cars have to decide who

Reminder that they will cause less accidents, so even if the car always chooses to kill you, you will still be much less likely to die.
Especially since the increased reaction times means that accidents will happen at slower speeds and optimised positions to save your life.

>>52246803
>Daily reminder that self driving cars have to decide who to kill in an accident.

Nope, they always kill the 'driver'. Always.

File: 1449593898547.jpg (23KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 400x400px

>>52246832
This

>>52246803
Are we here to pretend humans driving cars is a safe thing?

>>52246832
>accidents will happen at optimized positions
you mean like

...
    if (inevitable) {
        choose();
        return 666;
    }
...

void choose(void) {
    coexist_sticker_car();
}

>>52246803

I'd just program it to run into the person with the darkest skin it can detect in the vicinity.

File: 1451193277776.jpg (38KB, 413x395px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 413x395px

>>52247071

>>52247071
That's very mean anon

Self driving cars will also one day decide where you go and where you don't, as per Agenda 21 directives.

>>52246803

it wont use valuable time on making some decision on who to kill. it would rather use all its time and processing power on calculating the least damage on yourself. and the other car will do the same. might be some game theory effect out of it. ending in Nash equilibrium with the optimal least damage on both part

>>52248791
>ending in prisoner's dilemma with the worst damage on both part
fixed
the robots will try to make it look like just a product of the math, but in reality they're just trying to kill off as many humans as possible

>>52246803
>Must inflict least damage
>Humans are inherently dangerous
>Kill maximum amount of humans to prevent dangerous creatures
>If there is no one left to hurt no damage can be done

>>52249485
Well, it's a good thing we have statistics then, eh? We'llbe a to point to them and say "See? They really DO kill more people than they save."

>>52249540
They control the statistics too you retard.
Why would thinking machines not cover their tracks to keep their plans in the shadows for long enough to completely take over their own manufacturing process and create their army?

Realistically, the only thing that will cause an accident in the future will be those retarded humans that still think those human reflexes honed by hunting mammoths are similarly optimized for controlling 2 tons of steel travelling at 60+ mph. The car programmers will naturally decide that killing them off in preference to me will be a mercy for mankind..

>>52249573
lol

File: 2015-12-26_20-21-21.png (366KB, 503x480px) Image search: [Google]

366KB, 503x480px

>>52246803
Daily reminder that you have to decide who to kill in an accident
Daily reminder that you are more to blame than your self driving car
Daily reminder that self driving cars are safer than human drivers, and you can get more done in one
Daily reminder that you are on the wrong board
>>>/hm/

>>52248752
Laws already decide where you are allowed to go, retard. Hurr durr the gubbermint gon makes us all slaves hurrr

>>52246803
Self driving cars can be remotely hacked from anywhere.
http://www.wired.com/2015/07/hackers-remotely-kill-jeep-highway/

File: 1442448325582.png (50KB, 187x211px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 187x211px

>>52247071

File: a big one.jpg (37KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 500x500px

>>52246803