ITT: shit-tier distros

>>45702598
Ubuntu only.
Amazon crap mixed with unity shit.
What were they thinking?
Do plebs get satisfaction of using bloat?

>>45702625
gr8 b8 m8, check my 8

>using fedora 21 right now and enjoy it.

As a complete greenhorn with linux I like it so far a lot more than mint or ubuntu. Its the only one out of the 3 that doesn't look like complete shit right out of the box.

Like Jesus, what were they thinking with Unity?

>>45702649
Installing GNOME 3 on Arch gives you a much better experience.

>>45702598
I bet you faggot use windows

>>45702649
Fedora uses gnome, right?

>>45702699
Fedora uses whatever DE you want it to use.

>>45702638

KEK.

Also I'm not a fan of Ubuntu.

>>45702713
i meant by default

>>45702725
Gnome 3.14 or so, yeah

>>45702725
https://spins.fedoraproject.org/#bypopularity

File: justin_bieber_linux_distro_by_stylo9000-d3htu1n.png (538KB, 900x675px) Image search: [Google]

538KB, 900x675px

>>45702598
>shit-tier distros

Biebian

>>45702750
holy shit, some linux users are the most fucking dense people on earth

>>45702598
The plethora of tools provided by
Fedora allows me to get the job done.
It just works.

>>45702699
It does, and honestly, I don't mind it. XFCE is better, but GNOME is 1000x more tolerable than unity.

>>45702695
I'm pretty new and from what I've observed Arch seems to be considered a distro for people who are somewhat experienced and also care about ricing, and I don't fall into either of those categories.

>GNOME 3
bugged piece of shit

>>45702598
What's wrong with Fedora?

>>45702944
For starters the name.

>>45702960
You can say that about GIMP too.

>>45702960
>not liking EuphoriOS

>>45702972
although it's still lacking, I think Gimp is one of the top free/opensource programs ever.

>>45702944
It's not bad, it's just infested with systemd. infact fedora was one of (if not the) first distros to adapt it.
also
>rpm

>>45703000
I like systemd. Honestly I'd be happy if Debian updated GNOME more often.

>>45703000
>>45703013

What distros DON'T use systemd?

>>45703211
gentoo and some other reallyt obscure ones.

>>45703211
why Gentoo ofcourse.
why did you think it's /g/ approved?
It's also possible to remove the cancer from arch but it's not easy.
you can also block debian from installing systemd
smaller distros also may still be using sysvinit

what's wrong with systemd?

>>45702972
That's such a sexy name.
The GIMP.

Fedora vs CentOS, which is the better RedHat for a simple Java Dev?

>>45703783
Fedora.

>>45703654
Le what's wrong with lennartware maymay xD
Gtfo

>>45703841
>le systemd is bad and evil epic meme

>>45703000

/g/ in a nutshell.

>name two things in a way that implies they're bad for some unspecified reason
>argument done

>>45703654
hating systemd is an epic /g/ meme
that's all

>>45702617
>amazon crap
what? I only see that while typing privacy, than clicked a checkbox and never saw it again
>unity shit
ok, sperglord, go play with your minimalistic tiling window manager, maybe when you'll finish ricing it you can be productive
>using bloat
except that ubuntu has some cool features that I use everyday and all the bloat can be uninstalled

>>45702649
>using gnome shell
>complaining about unity
top kek

>>45702638
It's not bait. Arch is fucking horrible maintained by amateurs who literally have to copy everything Fedora does to survive. If you want to run a real bleeding edge distro then run rawhide (which is where Arch gets all of its core packages from)

>>45705113
6/10, made me reply.

>>45702625
Only right answer in the thread.

>>45702868
Arch is for people who want to feel experienced without putting the work in to run Slackware.

>>45705113
Red Hat's package system is horrible, same as Debian's. Modifying packages is a nightmare and there's no fucking guide for this for either of those. I just fuck packages and install to /usr/local, praying it won't bite me (I have the misfortune of working with Ubuntu and a little Cent Os at work).

I'd rather use makepkg or maybe portage.

As for bad distros, Debian and anything derived from it, especially Ubuntu and it's derivatives, because of the aforementioned build systems and plenty of other issues associated with package management.

>>45705999
Yes, I know you. You're the retard that thought that CentOS and Fedora has the same build system.

>>45705999
>!NezumipFxw

>>45706023
Please explain differences between build systems on Fedora and CentOS. They're using rpms, I doubt it differs significantly. In either case, I heuristically assume it's horrible as well. I can be wrong, sure, but I won't waste my time by testing my hypothesis. At least not now. I have a job and don't have much time to fuck around.

>>45706062
>I heuristically assume it's horrible as well
A true sign of ignorance. No wonder you only use Arch.

>>45706074
That's not ignorance.
Ignorance would be me being informed of something and ignoring it.
That's a lack of knowledge, motivation, and most importantly, time.

Please link me to an article about rebuilding packages on Fedora. Unless I'm being trolled, in which case pleas kindly fuck off.

>>45706114
You fuck off, redneck.

>>45706114
>too retarded to even google three words
As expected of an Arch user.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package

>>45705999
The shit? The Mcdonalds cash register runs on CentOS? nice

>>45702756
Holy shit this is actually a thing
http://biebian.sourceforge.net/

>>45706132
1. I haven't asked ow to create an rpm package.
2. As we can both see it's complicated as hell. More complicated than pkgbuild for sure.
3. Please fuck off.

>>45706155
>page explicitly states it's a /g/ joke
well fucking done

>>45706171
Are you a bot created for the specific purpose of pissing off responsible Linux users?

File: coreos-wordmark-horiz-color[1].png (20KB, 594x230px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 594x230px

Should be renamed to "Lennart and Docker Obsession OS".

File: 1373950940266.jpg (7KB, 242x208px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 242x208px

>>45704727
>installing software only to uninstall it

>>45706171
lol it's easy as fuck? Are you just retarded and too stupid to use a REAL build system? If arch is such a masterpiece then how come no one even uses it. Also tell my how come Archdevs never ever contribute anything to upstream.

>>45706196
>want program
>isn't in Arch repos
>is in AUR
>have to install base-devel packages to get AUR
>not programmer, don't want devel packages
>have to install things you don't want on a distro whose sole purpose is to not install things you don't want

>>45703000
Slackware as well

>>45706171
>3. Please fuck off.

>i-i-i-it's tooooo hard!!!!

I guess this is the part where you go back to windows, pleb.

File: 1416614168330.jpg (75KB, 804x906px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 804x906px

>>45706171
lel you're the average arch user

>>45706217
>don't install base-devel
>don't install the package you want
>gr8 job billy you didn't install the shit you wanted, now shut the fuck up

>>45706251
You seem to be missing the point.

>>45706144
lql

>>45702695
Yeah. I am using gnome 3 on arch right now. runs great.

>>45706302
>gnome 3
>arch
>great
pick one

>>45706409
what's wrong with something that works and I enjoy? Is that against the Linux philosophy?

>>45706489
arch: shitty unstable distro for hipsters.
gnome 3: buggy and unstable piece of shit; UI disaster.

>>45702598
Linux is already shit-tier.

>>45706630
kek

>>45706489
It's not the thing that works for me or that I enjoy. :^)

>>45706603
hmm. no problem here. but i'll keep an eye out. i have also used openbox no De's as well. but not muc need right now on a decent pc. depends on timing.2015 nigga

>>45706489
It is not the Arch Way.

>>45706640
What do you mean, "kek"? Is honesty funny?

>>45706698
It's only polite to laugh at one's bad jokes.

>>45706668
then why the fuck is it in the repos? jesus. why are some on you even on arch. go to slackware or lfs

>>45706739
Why are you still uing Arch? It's the Elfen Lied of distros.

>>45706739
>slackware or lfs
>not gentoo
It's like i'm not in /g/

>>45706707
What jokes?

>>45706763
I dunno. Arch works good for me. fast. update to date. I haven't had any breakage. but i've only been using for a littl emore than amonth. was a long time debian user. I'm not much into the neckbeard hateful type stuff though. I just do what I do.

>>45706818
gentoo = arch for autists

>>45706888
You can do what you do without using the Elfen Lied of distros.

>>45706915
Linux = Mac for know-it-all's.
Mac = BSD for arrogant pricks.
BSD = Linux for know-it-all pricks.

>>45706217
I used arch for a long time and stopped because I couldn't stand that in every update there was some package I needed to install because new dependencies.
After two years you have hundreds of packages without knowing why and if you uninstall them you have a broken system

>>45706885
stop baiting, it isn't any fun

>>45707140
this

File: images.jpg (7KB, 204x204px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 204x204px

Thinking about installing this tonight but I've heard CentOS is a hell of a lot more polished at the cost of more bloat. (Fuck do I know, I just installed Mint about two weeks ago on a different box. This will be my first experience with YUM and .rpms)

You make the call /g/ CentOS or Fedora?

>>45709194
CentOS is for servers or cheapskate enterprises. On a personal computer I'd choose between Ubuntu, Fedora, openSUSE and Debian Testing.

File: kek.png (684KB, 1366x293px) Image search: [Google]

684KB, 1366x293px

>fedora
>professional
pick one

>>45702625
/thread

>>45702649
But that font rendering, tho.

>>45710058
Just change the font to Droid Sans, enable antialiasing and fiddle with hinting. Beats the hell out of Windows sans extra software.

>>45706217
Oh look, the "base-devel is bloat; makepkg -i is too hard" guy again. Fuck off.

>>45710208
I'm sorry that your favorite operating system is a joke.

File: Screenshot from 2014-12-20 18:59:27.png (2MB, 1280x1024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x1024px

Uh...I like Fedora. :D