How will Moot make shekels now ?
There really isn't enough evidence from sites like this to validate that. The listed sites show captchas rarely and not on the scale that 4chan does. Also, privacy concerns, what data is sent yada yada.
be really careful on that question
Sure you can do that, but it's still fucking stupid.
I didn't actually say that. My statement actually had specifications. Your attempt to generalize it shows how utterly dense you are.
>you realize now that typing in "nigger" at the second word all these years actually had an effect
fuck yes nigger, nigger nigger google. The moment it came up I only typed niggers. Enjoy your niggers nigoogle.
>The old API will remain active
Why go with some new, untested CAPTCHA, when we can stick with what works?
cant even imagine how many iterations of nigger I wrote in this little bar over the years.
nngr nn nnigger nigers etc.
Oh little captcha, my molesting of you I shall always miss now.
>computers learn about human laziness, soon they will be able to predict how you will say nigger based on all kinds of factors
>until they hit a 100% prediction rate
>forever everything will be niggers
>you wouldnt have to type it ever again
>just thinking niggers will make it so
>nigretic computerized telepathy.
>mfw I'll have to keep buying the jewpass because he keeps my ISP blocked
If this actually works and isn't destroyed by bots, moot will probably have no choice but to implement it. Can you imagine the shitstorm if he refuses to? He'll be telling his userbase in not-so-subtle terms to fuck off, because money.
>How will Moot make shekels now ?
>Instead of asking users to pass a test, Google's new system pre-screens each user's behavior and filters out anyone who's easily identifiable as human.
Well no one on /g/ will qualify as this, so we'll still need the normal capcha
I dont really like moot that much but I did remember that people actually did want to give him money before and he kinda never wanted to monetize it. I thought that was kinda cool but his later sjw antics really made me dislike him. How people can change huh.
>mfw no posters
>mfw 4 boards dedicated to pedophilia
>mfw 95% are nsfw
>mfw owned by a japanese parent company hellbent on destroying 4chan while have no experience ever running an image board
Shill harder. Your dead altchan desperately needs users, and this post just ain't gonna cut it.
>I'll be able to incite large numbers of people against him eventually.
>Being this fucking butthurt about something/someone on the internet
4chan grew so large that there is even a subculture here probably, one that thinks that it defeated GG and that sjw fights are good. Probably on lesser boards like /lit/ and /sci/.
>cry against free speech
4chan has never been about "Free speech" despite what moot's ted talk led you to believe.
Its always been "you guys do whatever the fuck you want, and I'll do whatever the fuck I want."
Him banning SJW threads on /v/ is no different than banning Naruto threads on /a/. You've just deluded yourself to believe that moot owes you something.
and you've deluded yourself into thinking people can't disagree with moot.
he's an idiot that has run 4chan into the ground, /b/ has been dead for years and his pandering to SJW just makes things worse and worse.
>get a text message with confirmation code from google
>implying /b/ was ever good
This is how I know you are an idiot. 4chan has always been shit, and moot ran it into the ground years ago (PROTIP: Thats the reason 7chan was created, SEVEN YEARS AGO). Congrats on just figuring it out.
Not him, but he's right. Spam always existed before captcha was implemented. Everyone just ignored it and word/image filters helped fight it. There were also plenty of spambots that practically shut down the website in the past (red boxes etc.). The spambot that got moot to implement captcha was just a script that retards would willingly download and run. Manually permabanning everyone who posted spam could have solved things.
I'm aware. It worked in the past with other malicous scripts that morons downloaded. It would have worked then if mootles just gave it some time. Instead he decided to "temporarily" implement a captcha, then decided to charge people to post without it.
I can't blame him for wanting to make money, but people who claim he had no options should drink a gallon of bleach.
You've made the statement. Burden of proof is on you. Prove it.
I was there, faggot. The red boxes, yellow boxes, anontalk, and clockwork orange things were all separate incidents that happened months or year apart. The one that got captcha implemented was made by a dude who would do fucking Q&As on /g/ where he would talk about ay to improve the script etc.
So what? He implemented sheckle pass to make money. The recent Aussie hacker revealed that (at the time of the hack) there were about 12500 passes active, which means that moot made $250,000 off just the passes that were ACTIVE at the time.
How much of Google's progress in captcha technology is thanks to hordes of 4chan users relentlessly solving a million fucktons of captchas every day, providing ample opportunity for gathering all kind of crazy statistics? Fuck everything.
>many of us stuck to the "call the non control word always a nigger" policy.
>typing nigger rather than anything much shorter for the sake of being a manchild
It won't change anything
What precisely is the problem you people have with someone supporting a website they use a lot (by buying a pass since they don't want donations)? Do you hate people that donate to free software projects too?
I seriously doubt it. Wikispam and scripts on /a/, GNU pasta on /g/, ads on porn boards and many others weren't so rare to be overlooked and all of that made boards unusable plenty of times.
Was ignoring niggers part of your plan?
i haven't gotten any obscenities in my captchas but for actual occurrences of "nigger" where there is no other word identified for it you could simply rely on OCR and internal human checks. they would have to manually (or with special OCR software) check unidentifiable stuff (like non-standard characters) anyway.
>a test that would show you a picture of a cat and asked you to select similar photos from a grid. (Data collected in this way would also be used to improve Google's Image Search
Do yoy nigger entering faggots actually think no one proof reads the books digitized like that? Also all the books digitized with reCaptcha are public domain. You are destroying the only chance you asocial retards ever had to contribute a tiny bit to society.
>implying you have to do this
If you actually think google give the word only once, you are retarded
Its likely used several times to get rid off spelling errors and lies, why even bother with a filter?