[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Home]
4Archive logo
TECHNOLOGY IS OVER
If images are not shown try to refresh the page. If you like this website, please disable any AdBlock software!

You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology

Thread replies: 62
Thread images: 6
File: matchstick-art_6.jpg (46 KB, 353x530) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
matchstick-art_6.jpg
46 KB, 353x530
Nothing new will be invented.

Computers won't get faster or better. They've been stuck for 10 years at the same resolution screens and same processing ability.

The same shit technology is being recycled and sold back to you as new over and over again.
>>
>>45388828
it's the jews, man. just don't spend fucking money in the same old shit and the market must innovate to be relevant
>>
Huh? I don't remember having a mobile device with 2 gigs of ram 10 years ago.
>>
>>45388828
>acts like the change between 480p and 1080p happened overnight
>>
>The patent office should be closed down. There's nothing else to invent after the telephone.
>>
>>45388828
>forgetting he had 480p for 60+ years
>>
>>45388864
Yeah and for how long we've been stuck with 1080p now? Why is it that the 1440p/4k are being pushed just now and that they're extremely overpriced?
>>
>>45388858

10 years ago you didn't need 2gigs of ram because the OS running smartphones was lean and smart.
>>
>>45388828
Oh no!! We are not going to live in spaceships with virtual robot females? Ohh nooo! We won't upload ourselves to a simulated universe?? Oh noo!!!

Who would have said it was just a fantasy!
>>
>>45388896
10 years ago you could not play a decent game on your phone or use facebook.com that well.
>>
So we had 16 gigs of ram 10 years ago? We were also able to store terabytes of data?
>>
>>45388828
Yes, you're right.
Now go back reading your bible.
>>
>>45354735

2 gigs of ram in a phone was unthinkable 10 years ago.

OPs a moron
>>
>>45388907
Yes.
>>
>>45388907
Servers have been doing this since the 90s. It's just become affordable enough to have at home.
>>
>>45388895
Very little of TV is even 1080 yet. We only recently got rid of SD for the most part.

Color broadcast was introduced in the 50s and not standard until the 70s. We're doing pretty damn well that since the 90s we've gone through three standards and Analog to Digital swap. We're due for an upgrade and it's coming but it's progressing plenty fast.
>>
>>45388938

...educate yourself, consumer computers were nowhere near having that
>>
>>45388828
>They've been stuck for 10 years at the same resolution screens and same processing ability.
Damn nigga.
>>
WAT IS MOORE'S LAW. DERP.
>>
Quantum computing is coming. Slowly. Steadily.
VR headsets are coming. Faster than you think.
Higher resolutions are coming. Apple is pushing 5K.
Yet one thing stays the same. OP. All these years and you're still a faggot.
>>
>>45388828
What's that comic with the ghost that talks about this? Talking about how after the singularity being rich and white will be even more awesome? It's the same shit man. Unless you're rich your consumer tech will stay very similar for a long time. It's just a fact of life.
>>
>>45388967
You know you're worse than OP?
>>
>>45388906
>use facebook.com

10 years ago we had better social networks you could use on your phone and more privacy and touch screens and keyboards and offline navigation etc. etc..
>>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/End-of-history_illusion
>>
>>45388967
what is economy
>>
>>45388992
>more privacy
Is this a new meme?
>>
Guess it would help if most of you were actually old enough to remember 10 years ago.
>>
>>45388960
But we did have computers with 16GB of RAM and 1TB+ of data space.
No one talked about consumer, don't move the goalposts.

Educate yourself.
>>
>>45389022
It's you who is adjusting goalposts, shifty faggot. This whole thread was about consumer computing.
>>
this is such a stupid thread
>>
>>45388967
What does Moores law have to do with OP's implications?
>>
>>45389035
>Nothing new will be invented.

>Computers won't get faster or better. They've been stuck for 10 years at the same resolution screens and same processing ability.

>The same shit technology is being recycled and sold back to you as new over and over again.

No "consumer" anything in that whole text. Educate yourself.
>>
>>45389022

What is available to consumers now is proof this thread is stupid.

>neckbeard using sports reference
>>
>>45389035
show me any phone from 10 years ago with the same resolution as a new smartphone today
>>
>>45389042
It proves him wrong. Moores law is alive and well, that in of itself proves op wrong.
>>
>>45388972
Looking forward to quantum computing. It wont be too long now.
>>
>>45389022
Cool - now the government has computers that store over 3,000,000 - 12,000,000 TB.

Surely that's a big enough difference for you?
>>
>>45388992
ah,
>shitty display resolution
>no touchscreen
>no hardware graphics
>no..alots of missing features

compare today smartphones with yesterday junk like symbian
>>
>>45389048
Are you that stupid?
>>
File: smug-038.jpg (64 KB, 826x598) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
smug-038.jpg
64 KB, 826x598
>Nothing new will be invented.
But new things are constantly being invented.

>Computers won't get faster or better.
Except they are.

>They've been stuck for 10 years at the same resolution screens and same processing ability.
Kek. Consumer computing isn't a good benchmark for technological advancement you retard. Even then your statement is incorrect because over the past 2 years more and more high PPI laptops and monitors have been released, not to mention you're objectively wrong about processing power remaining the same.

>The same shit technology is being recycled and sold back to you as new over and over again.
*tips fedora*
>>
>>45389074
Are YOU that stupid? Educate yourself.

>>45389066
Yes, among a myriad of other stuff.
>>
File: op.cry.moar.jpg (49 KB, 618x394) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
op.cry.moar.jpg
49 KB, 618x394
I'll just leave this here.
>>
also shit thread.
The hardware is there.
all we need is the software to take advantages of it.

maybe a vidya gaymes with 160 threads running, using all the features of mantle
>>
>>45389083
Ate you a STEM sperglord? Why do you keep repeating those two words?
>>
>>45389088
>comparing facebook to sputnik 1
>implying
>>
> taking the b8
> this entire thread

God damn it /g/
>>
File: 1406928425514.jpg (66 KB, 236x210) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1406928425514.jpg
66 KB, 236x210
>1366x768 is still the most popular laptop resolution
>>
>>45389088
What a shit plot.
>>
>>45389100
Are you a NEET sperglord? Educate yourself.
>>
>>45389088
nice y-axis labeling, brah
>>
>>45389022
With enough cave walls to write on, cavemen were able to store petabytes of data.

Therefore, technology has never advanced in the entire history of mankind.
>>
>>45388992

Also WAAAAAYYYYY better battery life
>>
>>45389130
There. You said it again. Your autism is showing.
>>
>>45389160
But not as efficiently.

>>45389167
Still being baited? Educate yourself.
>>
>thinks changing the global technological structures happens overnight
>doesn't realize the red tape needed to be cut
>OP looked at clockspeeds from 2004 and now and saw they were the same
>doesn't realize we're in the age of tech where we just make current tech we have smaller and more efficient
>OP confirmed for poorfag who just can't afford to update his stuff every year
>>
>>45389180
>But not as efficiently

Yes that is the point I was making, thank you anon.
>>
>>45388828
>using screen resolution as a measurement of technical progress
>>
I read a newsreport about 10tb ssd's coming up.
>>
>>45389061
It'll be longer than you think. Intel claims they have a clear way to 7nm CMOS.

They'll probably switch to Silicon-Germanium wring it all the way down to 3nm, then just make stacked chips after that.
>>
>Ability to create larger amount of memory invented
>This is bulky, experimental, and costly
>Scientists use same method of packing said size of memory to squeeze smaller amounts of memory into smaller space
>upper levels still bulky and costly, but less now.
>Thousands of "levels" downgrade one step
>lower mid levels cross threshold and becomes upper low levels
>Finally economical to store more memory than before
>Behold, 32gb micro sd cards become inferior to brand new 64gb sd cards.
>>
Everything went to shit when amerilards stopped giving fucks about space. I have high hopes in russians and chinks.
>>
>>45389296
what does space have to do with it? a clock radio has more processing power than the vacuum tubes that sent people to the moon.
Thread replies: 62
Thread images: 6
Thread DB ID: 23660



[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Home]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at [email protected] with the post's information.