Archived threads in /g/ - Technology - 947. page

>>61869909
No reason to get rid of a perfectly good Cintiq and Asus ProArt display, even if they are a few years old.

>>61869909
I don't do graphic design. I work in the spreadsheet mines.

>>61869909
https://www.google.ch/amp/www.zdnet.com/google-amp/article/consumer-reports-pulls-recommended-ratings-on-microsoft-surface-laptops-based-on-reliability-scores/

>>61869878
OPO > Iphone

File: 1481798901792.webm (1MB, 720x404px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 720x404px

>>61869878
DONGLED
O
N
G
L
E
D

>>61869999
rekt, more people need to see this amazing get

>>61869824
it would appear that the error message is quite clear

>>61869824
oh vey goy just install the google drive app!

Microsoft Office doesn't have this problem.

Give it back, Jamal

toilet paper

>>61869372
Twist it until it breaks off.

File: asdf.png (29KB, 769x239px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 769x239px

whats the difference?

>>61869341
I upgraded from an mx100 to an 850 Evo and the performance difference is quite noticeable, up to twice as fast when doing things like opening DEs

Not sure how noticeable it would be for games though, some games are barely different between HDDs and SSDs in the first place

Games that stream constantly like GTA 5 would get a noticeable bump

>>61869504
Thanks for elaborating.

I should probably hold off

>>61869263
>>>/pol/

>>61869263
You put too many stickers on. Also they're too big. Don't just use bumper stickers anon. Those are meant to be put on cars or bike trailers.

>>61869263
>bringing politics into tech
lmao

>>61869253
muh github

that isn't the official logo, right? There's a line missing.

>>61869253
It's not that slow. Heavier than a text editor sure, but it's not like, horribly slow. To my knowledge, they're working on optimizing it (I think Electron is working on optimizing stuff too).

Samsung charger

>>61869117
Looks like an ethernet cable.

USB OTG cable

>>61869044
>he thinks windows is an ide

Did you just assume my gender?!

>writes proprietary code
>uses an operating system that sends all your code to microsoft
really makes you think...

yep

sent ;-)

function 4chan() {

    if [[ $# -ne 1 ]]
    then
        echo 'No URL specified! Give the URL to thread as the ONLY argument'
        return 1
    fi

    url=$1

    grep 'boards\.4chan\.org/[a-z0-9]\{1,4\}/thread/[0-9]\{4,12\}.*' <<< $url 2>&1 > /dev/null
    exit_code=$?
    if [[ $exit_code -ne 0 ]]
    then
        echo 'Malformed URL! Give the URL to thread as the ONLY argument'
        return 2
    fi

    curl -k -f -s $url 2>&1 > /dev/null
    exit_code=$?
    if [[ $exit_code -ne 0 ]]
    then
        echo 'Invalid URL! Or you don`t have permission to view the page'
        return 3
    fi

    if [[ $(grep '^http' <<< $url) ]]    # If thread doesn't have any protocol, add https
    then
        :
    else
        url=$(sed 's/^/https:\/\//' <<< $url)
    fi

    if [[ $(grep '^http:' <<< $url) ]]
    then
        url=$(sed 's/^http\(.*\)$/https\1/' <<< $url)
    fi

    total=$(curl -k -s $url | grep -o '\/\/i\.4cdn\.org\/.\{1,4\}\/[0-9]\{6,15\}\.[a-z]\{3,4\}' | uniq | wc -l)
    counter=1

    for image_url in $(curl -k -s $url | grep -o '\/\/i\.4cdn\.org\/.\{1,4\}\/[0-9]\{6,15\}\.[a-z]\{3,4\}' | uniq | sed 's/^/https:/')
    do
        echo -n Downloading image $counter of $total...
        wget --no-check-certificate -q -nc $image_url
        echo ' Done'
        counter=$(($counter + 1))
    done
}

me on the left

>>61868552
>he/him
?

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-12 at 9.33.34 AM.png (1MB, 1518x1672px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1518x1672px

>>61868552
Yess, yesss, good goy xDDDD

yes, you should cut your nails.

>>61868510
I was ready for such an unoriginal response, so you get no points
What about the sticker?

Holly fuck OP
Are you a cave troll?
It must be easy to skin the animal with those nails.

stupid windowsposter

>>61868412
This is my work machine friend. Other machine is Arch Linux.

considering we have at least 4 threads currently about this exact subject, i would have to say "yes"

>>61868196

::operator new

usually just calls malloc under the hood, but that's how the sepples people roll if you want uninitialized memory.

how do i push the length onto the stack and then pop it back into rdx without it segfaulting? i know that's the cause. it's getting a much bigger number out than i put in

section .data
    HW: db "Hello, world",10
    HWLen equ $-HW

section .text

Print:
    pop rdx 

    push rcx ; save registers
    push rbx
    push rax

    mov rax,4 ; sys_write
    mov rbx,1 ; stdout
    mov rcx,OutputBuffer ; define buffer location
    int 80h ; system call

    pop rax ; restore registers
    pop rbx
    pop rcx
    ret

global _start
_start:
    nop
        mov rax, HWLen
        Dec:        
            mov bl, [HW+rax-1]
            mov byte [OutputBuffer+rax-1], bl
            dec rax
            jnz Dec
        mov rdx,HWLen    
        push rdx
        call Print
        jmp Quit

    Quit:
        mov rax,1 ; sys_exit
        mov rbx,0 ; exit code 0
        int 80h ; system call

section .bss
    OBMaxLen equ 256
    OutputBuffer: resb OBMaxLen

>>61868388
Why though?
I was going to answer that it would simplify resource management because you wouldn't accidentally delete a malloc'd block, but then I remembered that you already have delete and delete[].

Reverend Bizarre, Electric Wizard or Nanocyborg

Anything faster makes me lose my focus

autechre sped up 4x at max volume

Eurobeat and ZUNs music