Archived threads in /g/ - Technology - 4069. page

How is it bad?

>>59216792
>nigger
>e/celeb

>>59216792
He's a nigger

>>59216762
No games, what a piece of shit.

>>59216762
> It'll do the task you want, but horrifically bad.
In reality, it does almost everything the world needs doing, and it does so in widespread production.

Only a fraction of Games and a subset of shitty art production depend on Windows / OSX.

What do the Commoners see in football?
Watching grown men chase a ball for 90 minutes, while you ingest ethyl alcohol and lay on your couch?
For what purpose?

>spending 500$ on gpu
>for 3% better performance
>>>/v/

>>59216739
Nope. 290X/260X is what I'll be sticking with until a better deal comes along.

>>59216739
not me.
If they would have quit dragging their feet back in January.. hell even if maybe they simply didnt give the fag the stream after ces and let an employee talk shit to the customers then I might buy it now.
But now, they let an employee talk shit to everyone, so fuck nvidia.

I dunno what you expect

Servers would be destroyed disabling some websites and services but apart from that people would still be posting online about it

>>59216725

In the "large attack", the 53 largest metropolitan areas of the US would be levelled.

how would that affect internet infrastructure?

>>59216764
Nearly all us sites would be unavailable

The rest would be fine I guess unless the ocean cables cut off places

>monthly new breakthrough battery tech announcement
Yawn

>>59216596
Do you remember how awful batteries were only 15 years ago?

>>59216605
You mean about the same as today?

I've got some old tech from 10+ years ago with lions that are similar capacity to ones now and lasted a similar time between chargss

tech bubble finally bursting, good riddance

>>59216548
God damn, you clearly have never made an investment in your life.

/g/'s desperate struggle to understand how the stock market works has been my favourite part of the Ryzen launch.

Two single core systems beowulf'd together.

Intel i3 cpu's

>>59218058
this

>>59216478
>The AMD Ryzen R7 series CPU is meant to go up against Intel's 8/10 core CPUs. In that regard, it completely destroys them on both price and performance.
Funny, that's not what 99% of /g/ was saying last week. :^)

File: muh $1700.png (54KB, 448x836px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 448x836px

my gaming

Lets just ignore that it gets close to a $1700 10 core CPU.

File: 1487870073357.png (263KB, 799x549px) Image search: [Google]

263KB, 799x549px

Please don't post Amada while arguing.

Amada is for cuteposting.

Yes, but you might want to look into Ad Naueseum

I prefer AdGuard over uHide Origin

>>59216416

uBlock Origin
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ublock-origin/

uMatrix
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/umatrix/

And MVPS hosts system-wide
http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.htm

Should block pretty much everything.

You're a lost soul, OP.

File: Capture.png (10KB, 513x67px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 513x67px

>>59216370
Also, the amount of disk space left on my drives has to end in 5.
If it doesn't, I find things to either delete or fill it up with.
If it's not like this I feel physical pain and start to get anxiety.

>>59216357
take a loan from your best friend.

File: Screenshot from 03-03-2017 05:40:37.png (788KB, 1265x610px) Image search: [Google]

788KB, 1265x610px

Remember to buy a $500 CPU to game at 640x480 because that's the PROPER way to test a CPU and not in the few hundred CPU benchmarks out there.

640x480 is the real world, not 4k.

File: 1488517326652.jpg (294KB, 917x1625px) Image search: [Google]

294KB, 917x1625px

I wonder why 4k benchmarks have been suspicously gone from reviewers, must have nothing to do with Intel.

Human eye can't see higher than 720p anyway

>it's don't

its is tho...

File: gaming cpu performance pentium wins.png (54KB, 450x887px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 450x887px

who cares what people say? all that matters is what is true. on /g/ we have some degree of freedom to banter with each other and post pics and that's all that matters. draw your own conclusions.

as far as I'm concerned, the best value for gaming is the 7700k and the best value in new CPUs is the ryzen 1700

File: butitdo_dex.jpg (91KB, 463x521px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 463x521px

>>59216337
They do think it's be like it is, but it's don't.

The interface felt so slow the last time I used it. Other than that, it's basically a chrome reskin.

What the fuck is Vivaldi and why should I care?

>>59216154
During last year's ECMI modelling week there was one project that used it. It could replace Matlab some day if it grows the same quality of software suite.

>>59216177
Jupyter Zeppelin Beaker etc (one or multiple of them) and all their more common languages already do this. There is no opening.

>>59216207
The Julia debts make some pretty bold performance statements on their website. Are they blowing smoke or is Julia really as fast as C and Fortran?

Hope they sort out their shit in time for R5 and R3

The dust has not settled yet faggot: https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/5x4hxu/we_are_amd_creators_of_athlon_radeon_and_other/def5h1b/

>>59216059
core for core, thread for thread, intel is better albeit more expensive.

if you're a gaymer, get intel
if money isn't an issue, get intel
if you're poor, get amd.

so nothings changed pretty much.