Archived threads in /g/ - Technology - 2193. page

give it back tyrone

Adb pull \cache\recovery .

>>60864996
Return it Jamal

>>60864991
You should specify intended use and screen size.

I plan on running Windows 7 on it. Usual use will consist of web browsing, video editing, vidya, and writing.

Screen size doesn't matter

>>60864467
facebook messenger

File: 1496688640674.gif (2MB, 228x270px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 228x270px

>>60864481

Signal (if you have each other's phone number) otherwise Wire or Riot (aka matrix.org)

>>60864323
I want a full size keyboard with the tenkey on the left, black switches, cherry stabilizers, and sweet lighting effects like my ducky board.
Does it exist?

File: jd.png (474KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

474KB, 1000x1000px

>>60864323
James donkey is 40 bucks on gearbest right now
>gaterons
>detachable cable
>good build quality
-one lighting
-looks like a tonka truck

>>60864363
It looks like the tonka part is removable, can anyone confirm?

File: 1496107857599.png (144KB, 446x451px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 446x451px

>tfw asked to invent a binary tree during interview

>tfw asked to insert a binary tree during interview

>tfw skip the interview because nepotism

>>60863795
shut up fag

>>60863801
sort yourself out

dunno why you would want one given how often his fucks up

File: q4pXd54.png (162KB, 568x602px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 568x602px

>>60863764
I know this is bait, but seriously, I can't take anymore of this.
>>>/v/, either actually LEARN informatics or fuck off.
I'm sick, physically and emotionally sick, of your incessant shitposting.
If you don't understand a topic, don't comment on it.
Linux is the furthest away from being obsolete compared to the proprietary and bricked shitfest that is Macintosh software and hardware, or the banal and bloated botware of Micropenis.
If you want play your shitty AAA games (in which they don't even bother anymore), rather than actually contribute to intelligent technology related discussion? That's great.
But newsflash!
We have a containment board for that rubbish:
>>>/v/
>Go home!
>Picture very much related, it is you trying to browse and understand TRUE /g/threads.

>>60863785
This, OP can choke on several large dick-shaped dicks

>>60863764
The bitter truth about writing code (in a enterprise business) is that you're going to spend more time doing research and meetings than actual coding.

signal is recommended by snowden but users phone number. Wire uses signals encryption iirc and requires no phone number so Wire, Signal, conversation, non open source etc

>>60865831
I tried wire with xprivacy installed, the app connects to a suspicious number of analytics services

>>60863651
>>60865831

Signal has VoIP what is really nice but I personally wouldn't recommend it because it's not really privacy friendly. It requires your phone number, has a web app that only works with google chrome and is based on a centralized semi-closed source server. Conversations is really nice and the most private of them all but the encryption can be difficult to set up in group chats because XMPP is an open protocol and everyone uses differend clients and servers. Haven't used threema but it is propietary software so no matter what they promise about privacy you dont know what they're doing really. Kinda pointless imo.

I personally use conversations + gajim desktop client for friends and matrix/riot for internet peeps because it's easier to use and you can still host your own server.

I guess a fair ranking would be Conversations > Riot > Wire > Signal > Threema > non open source etc

install gentoo

>>60863374
MAKI!!!!

>>60863374
so perfect

>>60863217
ARM is also closed and proprietary.

Emulation and emulators have gone to court and won basically 100% of the time. I don't think Intel will actually pursue this it looks more like a way to discourage other manufacturers from doing the same.

>>60863238
At the very least it's open to alternative implementations, whereas Intel is attempting to make noone else implement x86.

A quick rundown:


(*1) https://lwn.net/Articles/723169/
(*2) https://www.phoronix.com/forums/forum/software/general-linux-open-source/948623-grsecurity-kernel-patches-will-no-longer-be-free-to-the-public?page=1
(*3) https://www.embedded-linux.de/18-news/886-grsecurity-nicht-mehr-kostenlos-verfuegbar
(*4) https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/04/26/grsecurity_linux_kernel_freeloaders/

GRSecurity removes public testing patch - goes full commercial.

(*5) http://www.openwall.com/lists/kernel-hardening/2017/06/04/24

>"Don't worry about it, there's nothing for a "grateful" user like yourself
>to download anymore. Boy, if I had more "grateful" users like yourself
>obsessed with harrassing us on Twitter, Reddit, and IRC so that they
>can go around and paint themselves as some kind of victim, I wouldn't
>know what to do with myself.
>
>-Brad"


Brad Spengler prevents a private purchaser from redistributing the sourcecode via contract clauses between him and they: thus willfully frustrating the purpose of the license HE was granted by the linux kernel rightsholders. This is another reason a court may find him in violation of the license grant of the GPL. As we discussed previously. (See: ****)

Also Brad Spengler threatens others with lawsuit in a nearly transparent attempt to get them to stop porting over the work:

>" This stops *now* or I'm sending lawyers after you and

(*6) http://www.openwall.com/lists/kernel-hardening/2017/06/03/14

>" This stops *now* or I'm sending lawyers after you and

(*6) http://www.openwall.com/lists/kernel-hardening/2017/06/03/14

>Guys, this is your *last warning*. This stops *now* or I'm sending lawyers
>after you and the companies paying you to plagiarize our work and violate
>our *registered* copyright (which for the record entitles us to punitive
>damages which now are very easily provable). It's time to get serious
>about attribution -- what you are doing is completely unacceptable. I'm
>already in contact with lawyers to prepare for the next time this happens.
>If any of this plagiarized and misattributed code actually made it into
>the Linux kernel, you'd all be in a world of pain.

Here Brad Spengler threatens a copyright infringement lawsuit regarding his non-original wholly-derivative work.
(An original work stands alone). This while he threatens those paying customers who might redistribute the work (see: **** below).


Note: Copyright licenses (like any license to use the property of another (copyright is freely alienable in the same way real property is)) are freely revocable unless barred by estoppel. The GPL v2 lacks a no-revocation clause thus estoppel would be more difficult to argue (additonally none of the "agreeing parties" have ever met each other).

Note2: GrSecurity is a derivative work of the linux kernel, it is non-seperable: it wholly relies on the linux kernel source code to work.
Courts in both the US and Germany have reaffirmed that if a work based on another work cannot stand alone it is clearly a derivative work.
(See the Anime Subtitles case from a few years ago) (See page 6 of the phoronix discussion at *2 for a review)

Note3:The linux kernel is not under joint copyright, it is simply a collection of derivative work upon derivative work.

Note3:The linux kernel is not under joint copyright, it is simply a collection of derivative work upon derivative work.

A simple solution is for one or many of the rightsholders to the code GRSecurity is derived from/ modifies to rescind Brad Spengler's license to use or modify their code.

Additionally copyright violation claims can be filed as Brad Spengler has reportedly attempted to frustrate the purpose of the agreement that allows him to modify the linux kernel in the first place; placing additional restrictions to prevent redistribution of the sourcecode (a court would not be fooled by such a scheme).

(Addionally there were third parties who contributed to the GRSecurity code base when it was publically distributed.)


Other snippets from (*5) include Mr Spengler's unhappiness with the publication of his scheme and RMS's opinion of it:
>... It has been nearly 4 months now and despite repeated follow-ups, I still
>haven't received anything back more than an automated reply. Likewise
>regarding some supposed claims by RMS which were published last year by
>internet troll mikeeusa -- I have been trying since June 3rd of last
>year to get any response from him, but have been unable to. So when you ...

RMS' opinion can be seen here:
(*7) https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2016/06/msg00020.html

>Re: GRsecurity is preventing others from employing their rights under version 2 the GPL to redistribute source code
>Richard Stallman (May 31 2016 10:27 PM)
>
>[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
>[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
>[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
>If I understand right, this is a matter of GPL 2 on the Linux patches.
>Is that right? If so, I think GRsecurity is violating the GPL on
>Linux.
>

>>>/wg/

???

File: kronspolar_1920.jpg (507KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

507KB, 1920x1080px

Not sure if this thread should be over on the wallpapers subboard or not, but here is one.

>>60862976
>expects help
>doesn't even say what phone it is

>>60862976
every android phone is obsolete as soon as you leave the store.

your best bet is lineage os, but good luck if your phone isn't officially supported

>>60862995
Alcatel one touch.

:(

>>60862675
I came for Chip's challenge

>>60862960

Yeah dude that game was dope, it and skifree were my shit

Never mind, it just doesn't even exist yet.

What is it and why should I care?

>>60863147
A fingerbox