why are C and C++ dying?
All languages are dying compared to javascript.
>>61343522
How were people using Rust before it existed?
max performance and speed arent a large concern in most cases anymore because everyone has 4 cores and 8gb of ram
https://stallman.org/glossary.html
imagine being this autistic lol
How will lincucks recover from this?
>>61343505
Stallman doesn't into Linux.
>1 IP
lol
>all these le_donald faggots shilling in overdrive against net neurtrality
lol why dont you kids fuck off back to your discord servers where you are coordinating this from
even if you get your way places like this are gonna be the first ones that the american media machine cuts off from you
>b..b..but... you're a KEK!
>it's just... just a MEME
*yawn* it's nice that you are finally taking the steps to remove burgerposters for us but could you do it a little more quietly? thanks, sweeties
I hate rightists so fucking much.
>>61342895
But we need to make America great again.
>>61342895
These /pol/fags ousting NN because MUH JOHN OLIVER are absolute cancer.
Pic very related, the code doesn't even work. It's just an infinite loop because the loop doesn't terminate when the user enters a return.
>>61342683
it's called ctrl+c genius
have you tried pressing ctrl-d you fucking inbred
also take note of how much less readable that is than it's c counterpartwhile ((c =getchar()) != EOF) {
sum += c - '0'
}
>>61342739
Are you fucking terminally retarded? That terminates programs immediately, it would not output the sum.
Just got myself out of a big time scam. I was lucky enough to figure out that there is no such thing as a level 5 Microsoft technician. What should I do now?
>>61342656
Green text it
>>61342656
>I was lucky enough to figure out
How fucking retarded do you have to be to even end up in a position where you are about to be scammed? I mean you missed 5-10 giant fucking red flags BEFORE you ended up there.
Why were you dumb enough to think that tech support would call you?
Post your simple/small/stupid questions
Take at least 10 seconds to google first
Old Thread: >>61330263
>>61342376
Best all in one Dev environment for Linux?
why is /g/ filled with pedos
>>61342376
Seriously what's wrong with communism?
if you're wondering what ISPs will do if net neutrality is repealed, we already know.
2005 - Madison River Communications was blocking VOIP services. The FCC put a stop to it. https://www.cnet.com/news/telco-agrees-to-stop-blocking-voip-calls/
2005 - Comcast was denying access to p2p services without notifying customers.
2007-2009 - AT&T was having Skype and other VOIPs blocked because they didn't like there was competition for their cellphones. http://fortune.com/2009/04/03/group-asks-fcc-to-probe-iphone-skype-restrictions/
2011 - MetroPCS tried to block all streaming except youtube. https://www.wired.com/2011/01/metropcs-net-neutrality-challenge/
2011-2013, AT&T, Sprint, and Verizon were blocking access to Google Wallet because it competed with their bullshit. http://www.businessinsider.com/verizon-blocking-google-wallet-2011-12
2012, Verizon was demanding google block tethering apps on android because it let owners avoid their $20 tethering fee. This was despite guaranteeing they wouldn't do that as part of a winning bid on an airwaves auction. https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-tech/post/fcc-fines-verizon-125m-for-blocking-tethering-apps/2012/07/31/gJQAXjRLNX_blog.html
2012, AT&T - tried to block access to FaceTime unless customers paid more money. https://www.freepress.net/press-release/99480/att-blocking-iphones-facetime-app-would-harm-consumers-and-break-net-neutrality
2013, Verizon literally stated that the only thing stopping them from favoring some content providers over other providers were the net neutrality rules in place. https://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2013/09/18/verizons-plan-break-internet
This is the future you choose when you shill against net neutrality.
dumb frog poster
>>61342270
no u
Fuck off libtard scum
Does softrware prove reincarnation?
>run program
>close program
>run program again
Discuss
Lol u r a retard
>>61342123
Dumbest fucking shit I've read so far today. A thread died for this trash.
>>61342123
My sides
Why doesn't the internet have an age limit? Kids should be at least 16 to use the internet for non-educational purposes.
>>61341981
user has disconnected from your channel
>>61341981
Blame bad parenting. I agree.
>>61341981
hes gonna see it anyway. how do u fucking hide the internet from a 14 year old
Will net neutrality be feasible once we hit 5g/IOT
>>61341879
Well we probably wont reach those speeds if we continue with net neutrality. NN prevents competition and slows down any advancements and innovation in the internet sector. It's already in an ISPs best interest to treat data equally unless they want to lose subscribers. NN is just a useless regulation that gives the government more power over the internet.
>>61343077
>treat data equally unless they want to lose subscribers
Who will they lose them to?
Name me more than two ISPs in your local area you can get service from.
>>61343117
That is a legitimate argument.
However, from my experience being a high speed Comcast/Xfinity subscriber that torrents daily, I haven't been throttled. Around 2015 and early 2016 I used to get noticeable drops in download speed but it seems they've come to their senses and since then ive never gotten throttled which only proves my point. Its not economically advantageous to throttle internet speeds for any reason because if they do enough people will find out and they'll have to stop, and ESPECIALLY if they're the only major isp in the area because they'd be the ones getting all the business.
https://www.battleforthenet.com/july12/
>The FCC wants to destroy net neutrality and give big cable companies control over what we see and do online. If they get their way, they’ll allow widespread throttling, blocking, censorship, and extra fees. On July 12th, the Internet will come together to stop them.
What is /g/ doing to save the Internet? Come on, let's get active NOW!
Don't get fooled by all the shills and shitposters.
>>61341738
STOP WITH THE FUCKING SPAM, YOU CUNTS
>>61341738
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Day_of_Action_to_Save_Net_Neutrality
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/07/todays-day-lets-save-net-neutrality
https://www.theverge.com/2017/7/12/15958030/net-neutrality-day-of-action-internet-companies-list
As citizens of the net it is our responsibility to protect the wellbeing of the Internet.
Call the FCC, apply pressure, spread the word about the campaign and why net neutrality is important, whatever you can do: start with it now!
Most importantly /g/ could help write the code for a more resilient, neutral, secure and privacy-respecting Internet. Stop coding that useless app/script of yours and start helping out important projects such as meshnet projects, IPFS, etc.
>>61341762 Which irrelevant shitpost-thread do you fear of getting pushed off due to this one? What's your problem?
Ok, so I'm sure we've all heard the clever analogies of net neutrality to deliverymen refusing to deliver certain goods to homes for whatever reason, unless the goods provider pays up (in Netflix's case this analogy works perfectly).
However, and I haven't seen anyone account for this, isn't this simply a blatant breaking of contract? If, as a customer, I paid money to USPS or Verizon to deliver me a good, at a certain speed no less (3-day delivery or 10 Mb/sec), it cannot be legal for them to intentionally delay said delivery, for any reason whatsoever.
Most intelligent people I know disagree with net neutrality merely on the basis that this situation cannot possibly be legal, it is so absurd. A customer paid for a certain service, how can the service provider not fulfill its end of the agreement?
How can this be explained?
>>61341587
You're missing the whole point. If net neutrality were to go away, it would become like TV, where you have to subscribe to packages and get a limited amount of channels.
>>61341705
I'm not sure what I'm not getting.
At any rate, don't we already pay for internet packages in a sense, choosing the types of speed that we want, etc?
>>61341587
>How can this be explained?
To quote Cave Johnson;
"Right. Now, you might be asking yourself, 'Cave, just how difficult are these tests? What was in that phone book of a contract I signed?
What was in that contract?
Well that contract will include a clause that says they don't have to do anything and fuck you. You buy a service up to a set speed. They will try to connect you. Will try to deliver you data but in the end they have no obligation to do anything.
When they start shaping your network traffic that's legal. Right until ISP got reclassified as utilities then the government can regulation them for aspect like how they treat traffic and just what level of service they can claim to sell vs what they actually deliver.
>Headphone purchase advice:
http://pastebin.com/fYZLW7Ub
Please put some effort into your requests and questions.
If you dislike a suggestion, explain why and try giving a better suggestion to whomever asked.
For sub-$50 headphones and IEMs, check out the infographic in >>>/g/csg
>/g/ wiki headphone FAQ:
https://wiki.installgentoo.com/index.php?title=Headphones
Previous thread - >>61327658
>>61340427
Best girl
>>61340427
Idol trash here.
What's your setup like, Anon?
>>61340595
Hola.
It's upgrade days, boys.
>>61340166
What's the difference?
whats up with rampant apple shilling recently?
>>61340176
The one on the right has no desktop background
Which Android browser, /g/?
Firefox
dolphin plus extensions
Super fast browser