>eating maintenance = maintaining weight >current weight includes that fat >logical answer = eat below
that said if you eat correctly you will eventually see results - that said the science behind it is not exact - you won't simply lose fat by eating less fat, its misleading. the only proven thing is to eat below maintenance and short term you are guaranteed to see bf% decrease.
skinny fat here, tried both bulking and maintaining several months to get rid of the pudgy belly shit. just did a bit of research and yeah, eating below seems to be the proven way for fast results. even though i am losing some strength in the meantime, its gotta be done
>>35654037 is this a troll? you mean oxymoron... onomatopoeia is like "tick tock", something spelled like the sound it makes. besides, skinny means thin, while fat means an excess of flab. skinny does not mean the absence of flab. and then thirdly, you avoid saying skinnyfat because you think people dont say it irl, then you make up a joke to tell people that only people who knew the in-joke in the first place would understand.
Depends how fat you are. If you are skinny fat and not new to lifting, I'd say enjoy your weight, eating higher cals and get strong. More or less maintain weight for 3-6 months. When happy with strenght levels then cut.
If you are new I'd say get on a good 3day full body routine, eat a little below maintance and slow cut 1-2lbs per week and try to get stronger.
Whatever you do you're gonna need to focus all your efforts into cutting at some point, but don't be a weak little shit.
>>35654481 youre a fucking moron. nobody, NOT EVEN YOU, said they are starting/did start as a skeleton. youre trying to make the best of the fuck up you made to save face despite being an anonymous avatar who can simply close the internet to avoid being humiliated.
that said, as long as you are reaching your protein requirements you will make absolutely normal gains whether or not you are on a cut. being a skeleton only means you will reduce bf% which reduces the amount of force you can exert and missing maintenance your organs for the mass you WILL put on. there is absolutely no short term consequence that would suggest gaining muscle on a deficit is even bad, let alone impossible you fucking mong
im sorry, did you not gather from the last several posts that your posts are irrelevant? you are actually that kid who sits in the front of the class who raises his hand not to ask a question, but to just repeat what the lecturer already said for no purpose other than to waste everyones time gaining brownie points for class contribution
Thread replies: 25 Thread images: 3
Thread DB ID: 443972
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org with the post's information.