Survey time

>>35591087
wtf she doesn't even break parallel, how is this allowed?

>>35591087

can easily outlift this inferior female

squat 410

diddly 500

binch 285

>>35591087
People who really don't need to 'share their epiphany with the masses' just keep their mouth shut and get on with it, showing rather than telling. She's still an attention ho, albeit an impressive one

>not going ATG at a meet to assert dominance
>ayylmao
>pulling SUMO
Although there's nothing wrong with sumo but c'mon. Of course I can out lift this girl
Stats:
Sqwwwaat: 430
Dead(Conventional): 540
Bench:270
1,000lb+ Total Club Member

>>35591087
MIXED

>>35591087
>bench 220
>with those triceps
>deadlift 405
>with that back, legs, and core
Yeah sure

File: 2016-01-13_130048.png (510KB, 442x595px) Image search: [Google]

510KB, 442x595px

>>35591087
i was just thinking about her the other day and had completely forgot her name

impressive stats but her physique looks meh, I've seen women squatting <100kgs with bigger quads

>>35591087
>bench 120
>squat 310
>deadlift (for the first time) 310
>20 pullups
>never ran a half marathon

>>35594152
what is strength vs hypertrophy training + fat distribution and muscle belly genetics

>>35591087
YES
Lifting 7 months
165/250(pause) 270 (touch)/330(ATG) 360 (PL)/435

File: 1450695267325.jpg (266KB, 1658x960px) Image search: [Google]

266KB, 1658x960px

>>35594180
>strength vs hypertrophy training
until someone shows the studies that showed no difference between the two
pic is a guy that did ss then madcows