YO /FIT/ my mother fixed my Body dysmorphic in 1 day. all she

>>35577137
>fuck you /fit/ for making me attracted to little boy bodies
/fit/ didn't do this
you did

>>35577137
>everyone looks like shit
>so i don't have to try anymore

No

>>35577137
if you let the average person dictate your standards, all you will ever be is average. if you're ok with that, that's fine. i'm not.

>>35577137
>fuck you /fit/ for making me attracted to little boy bodies

/fit/ made me gay, but not for little boys.

>>35577137
>measuring your progress by comparing yourself to others
>become more complacent when you see people smaller than you
Not gonna make it

>no one has yet commented on the fact that he was naked with his mom
Never change fit.

>>35577210
>>35577252
being affected by body discography isnt very healthy though.

>>35577281
Im gonna go ahead and assume you meant body dysmorphia. And yes while that is true most causes of body dysmorphia are from comparing yourselves to others and setting unrealistic standards for yourself. The only person you should be comparing yourself to is your previous self.

Finnish "people"

I had the same when I started doing hot yoga. Showers afterwards, in a room with 10 other naked people. No one really looks anything special, and since everyone just stripped down and showered.. you know, why still feel ashamed? There's nothing new or weird to see.

>>35577137
... So let me get this straight, you went to a mixed sauna with your mom?

Did you see your mom naked? Even to you Euro freaks, seeing your mom naked has got to be weird.

>>35577433
seeing your parents nekkid is ok as long as you don't make it awkward. can't imagine spending a whole day with your mom around chilling naked though wtf

>>35577478
Yeah, there's literally no way to spend a whole day naked with your mom and not have it be weird. Unless your family regularly has sex with each other recreationally, I don't see you can possibly hope to diffuse the confused sexual tension you'd have with your mom after seeing each other naked for so long in a mixed sauna.

>>35577548
actually my mother and sister.

it was a family out

>>35577622
body dysmorphia is the least of your concerns, ever wonder if your parents are actually related? you may be inbred

>>35577636
well we arent that fucking retarded here in europe

so we can have fun family outs without anyone giving a shit.

i saw a mom with her 12 year old son and daughter as well

>>35577772

>euro degeneracy

you deserve your Muslims

File: 1399401030920.jpg (46KB, 531x471px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 531x471px

>>35577772
>>35577137
Whoah don't cast your weird naked family aspersions over the entirety of Europe. In Britain this kind of behavior would be enough to be banished from the community, your only farewell a fanfare of tuts. Shame on you, degenerates.

>>35577919
everyone can act normal in nudity and chillout.

somehow a worse society then amerimuslims

>>35577137
Yeah no shit.

Why do you think people still come to /fit/ after their first three months?

It's to induce body dysmorphia and trick yourself into thinking you have competition.

It's not about being better than anyone else, it's about being better than your former self.

>>35577772
>Europe is one country
I bet you from some Romania

>>35580342
belgium, netherlands, luxemburg, germany all have mixed gender naked saunas as the default.

>>35577235
Absolutely this desu senpai

>>35577154
>>35577241

This.

/fit/ might make you homo, but it doesn't make you a paedophile.

>>35580412
maybe that was /a/

or the traps i fap to, which usually get more shota everytime a new one comes out.

anyway /fit/ made me like dick

>>35580578

You can fix this anon. Stick to twinks/shemales/traps. Don't watch porn anymore. No videos. No pictures. Fantasise only about the above - no 'shota', no 'little boy bodies'. Paedophilia isn't okay. Children cannot provide adequate consent to what they do not understand.

how'd your mum look naked?
?/10

>>35577919
Britain doesn't have any moral high-ground
>skyrocketing obesity
>hedonism everywhere

>>35580614
>children cannot provide adequate consent to what they do not understand.
What if...what if i made them understand?

>>35581102

You simply can't.

They don't have the mental capacity.

This is why even with things like consent to surgery where it has to be given my parents/guardians in most cases because they cannot full comprehend the dangers and risks involved. Don't fuck them up or impose yourself.

>>35580614
well i wont ever do something like that, i just think they kind of have an attractive body now.

i wont even stop them to have a chat or something like that, let alone try to touch them. thats disgusting. (i mean arousing, but disgusting because it has deep consequences for the other party)

>>35580976
pffffff, i mean it my mom.
she is 55 and looks 40 i would say. not skinny but also not skinnyfat.

>>35581158
i wanted to touch boobies and rub my dick against a girls thighs when i was 6-8

now that i think about it 4 is probably when i had my first hard on. i had sex with my best friend. (which involved rubbing our dicks against eachother for a few seconds and nothing else.)

>>35577137
So what im getting from this story is: you enjoyed seeing your mother naked

>>35577622
>my sister enjoyed every minute of wearing a sports bra and being underwater... but I didn't

>>35581196

> i just think they kind of have an attractive body now.

THEY DON'T HAVE ATTRACTIVE BODIES.
THEY'RE CHILDREN.
CHILDREN ARE OFF-LIMITS.

>>35581196

> now that i think about it 4 is probably when i had my first hard on
> 4

Confirmed for bait.

>>35581301
anon, just because you believe it's immoral to do something and you've decided that you won't, you don't need to lie to yourself that it's not attractive

you're like those people who are all 'lol I can't understand why people even get drunk/do drugs/have fun' it's just self delusion because you're afraid that your desires don't align with your ethics

but that's literally how it's always been

the only reason ethics is even a thing is because we find some desirable things unethical

>>35577137
>>35577154
>>35580412
Double this, /fit/ not only doesn't make you a pedo, it actually makes you start liking either buff muscular men, buff muscular women, or fat women if you fall for the high test meme. So if anything continue browsing here and you may be cured of your pedo tendencies.

>>35581395
this is true desu, used to be into loli and traps, now my tastes are way more vanilla with a side of muscle girls

>>35581371

> you don't need to lie to yourself that it's not attractive
> you're afraid that your desires don't align with your ethics

Anon. Incest, for example, is unethical. Why? Because if procreation occurs as a result of incest, it can lead to severe biological dysfunction. Thus, it's concluded that this isn't something that people ought to do. It's damaging for humans and their development as a race.

> the only reason ethics is even a thing is because we find some desirable things unethical

I would agree with this in regards to things such as cannibalism, but only in the case when someone has died. HOWEVER, I think it's more beneficial to donate your organs to others, donate the remnants to science, and cremate whatever is left.

Children do not have the mental capacity to consent to sexual activity - this is why there's an age limit. Most societies have determined that engaging with underage 'children' is damaging, not only physically damaging (in the cases of penetration) but mentally (they don't fully grasp what's happening). It's on this basis that it's unethical.

Therefore, it's fair to conclude that ethics is an accurate reflection of desire and ought to be adhered to for the betterment of society. Whilst I have enormous sympathy for paedophiles, given what appears to be desires sprouting from no element of free choice, it's those who act on those desires who are truly repulsive. I will personally ravage your hole to oblivion if you even touch a child with any sexual intention.

>>35581452
I agree that reproductive incestuous relationships are unethical for the reasons you gave. However, that doesn't mean I'm going to lie to myself and pretend I don't want to smash my hot relatives on some level.

I think you might have missed my point on the second one. Ethics literally exists to be applied to things that you'd like to do. If you don't want to do a thing, you're not going to stress out about whether it would be wrong to do a thing.

It's certainly unethical to have sex with a child, but that's no reason to avoid acknowledging that on some level you find children attractive.

There's no need to lie to yourself about your desires. Recognising and accepting your desires is completely compatible with not acting on them and being a good person. So it's ok, anon, you can admit that you're into kids. It doesn't change anything to do with your moral character.

File: 1421206666695.jpg (38KB, 466x470px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 466x470px

>>35577137
>you're-a-peons are so desperately cucked by americans that they literally can't help but mention them twice in a post that has nothing to do with them

priceless

>>35581536

> However, that doesn't mean I'm going to lie to myself and pretend I don't want to smash my hot relatives on some level.

Having that mentality and acting on that mentality are two separate things. In cases where you don't really know your relatives, e.g. cousins you rarely see, I guess this can be expected. However, I still thing it's unethical because a biological connection still exists.

> no reason to avoid acknowledging that on some level you find children attractive.

I think you could look at a child, and on a genetics-basis, anticipate whether or not they're going to develop into becoming attractive. Or you can consider them attractive but that attraction has no loving or sexual aspect to it. The difference between that and you is that your feelings do have a loving and sexual (one or both) aspects to it. Unethical? Perhaps not. Acting on it makes it unethical. The mentality itself is just simply a failure of social conditioning - you fell outside the net.

> you can admit that you're into kids.

gr8 b8 m8 i r8 it 0/8.

>>35581606
>I think you could look at a child, and on a genetics-basis, anticipate whether or not they're going to develop into becoming attractive.
This is the same kind of rationalisation mang. Just be honest with yourself about your base urges.

I'm not saying having those urges is ideal. Nor am I saying that having urges to X makes X a good thing.

It's like when you have the urge to jump off a building, or to punch someone in the face. There's no point pretending you don't have those urges - you'll just end up in a cycle of cognitive dissonance and self loathing.

If you want to master yourself and be able to command your desires, the first step is acknowledging them.

>>35581717

> Just be honest with yourself about your base urges.

I'm done replying to you. This bait is just so low-tier that I'm going to spend my time with someone who's deserving of attention.

>>35581759
You're the one whose justification for why children aren't attractive was that they're off limits.

>>35581285
don't start that shit

grills

File: hqdefault.jpg (8KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 480x360px

>>35577339
look at this guy doesn't know the first thing about body dystopia

>>35581285
You don't make any sense

>>35582111
How normies think body dysmorphia works
>fit guy thinks he looks like trash
>doesn't realise he looks way better than 90% of people

How it actually works
>fit guy thinks he looks like trash
>thinks 90% of the population looks worse than trash