>>35537422 Yeah im a medfag, ideally, you want a fit woman for 3 basic reasons
1. Women who are lower body fat are also less likely to have high progesterone. Higher levels hormones like progesterone and estrogen are linked with cancers of the sexual organs. so try to get a fit/low fat wife!
2. If you're interested in the way your kids will look aka you want fit/attractive kids, try to get a fit/attractive wife. Partially genetics and partially upbringing will affect how your kids will look. If you have a nice jaw line and your wife has a nice jaw line, then your kids might get a nice jaw line too. it's not guaranteed, but it's nice for increasing the odds of having attractive children. I'm not saying a fat person cant have a nice jaw line, just that it's more clear on a thin/skinny person.
3. If you are into fitness, you want a significant other who is also into fitness. It's just nice when you push each other to do well. Not necessarily just your wife, playing the same sport as your kids is really good for them and it helps you understand what they need to do to improve!
>>35537422 Yes according to epigenetics your experience of life has a direct impact on which genes your body expresses and which it suppresses. Recently research has shown that these effects actually get passed down to your children, so although breeding with a fit female won't necessarily give you fit aesthetic offspring, they will be more likely to pick up lifting and find it enjoyable.
Although chubbier women can increase the chances of your daughter having bigger breasts.
I'de like to say yes, but desu senpai there is nothing that turns me on more than a cute, pale, soft, fragile, tiny woman who swoons over me doing stuff she can't do and gets off on it as much as I do.
I know fit women do this too but I dunno man I just love it. It might bite me in the ass in the long run if I end up having kids with one of these sluts and she turns into a hambeast but right now I am having the time of my life pounding these little porcelain dolls into oblivion.
>>35540964 >7'1" >fit femanon kek. At least try to be believeable.
>>35541285 You could also increase your numbers by telling your bitchass skelly friends to go lift a weight. I'm serious, chicks don't listen to men. Fit girls are probably the only people that can convince these skinny bitches to lift. Go steal their boyfriends, and let them know that they'll never keep a man with skinny legs and a flat butt
>>35537465 That's not how that works; and you're providing no source for your claim.
Testosterone increases sensation, libido, and orgasm; so if she's having more fun as such, she's probably going to be more stable. Even more, fitness increases circulation, hormone balance, reduction of stress, mood, and energy.
seriously though. when a women has low bf% it slows/shuts down estrogen production. it makes women less fertile
there is a reason you don't see fit women/athletes with high test hips. they usually have a fat ass but hips are lacking unless extreme genetic bone structure. this is because estrogen is responsible for storing fat on the hip area and other areas that are female specific.
I think a women should be lean but not muscular. in a breeding sense you want the girl to have some fat on them and it's also very important to have fat on their body when they have children
>>35537643 are you stupid? you clearly have not taken a class on anatomy if you are using progesterone has a main point for low body fat on women.
>>35546638 The reason you don't see fit women or athletes with hips that are wide as fuck is because there's not much fat on their body at all. You're literally saying that the reason women with lower bodyfat have lower bodyfat is because having low bodyfat changes hormones which give them different fat deposits. It makes no fucking sense at all.
The reason they have a "fat ass" is because it's very easy to train that area, so the muscle under the thin fat layer makes the overall area look bigger, whereas on the hips, there's not as much potential to train them in order to be huge, so the lower overall fat levels makes them appear smaller.
It's not great for fertility reasons if a woman has super low bodyfat, but even being around 12% isn't going to shut down their hormone production, that's ridiculous.
And no-one's arguing that a fit woman should eat the same way when they're pregnant, that's a whole other matter.
>>35544457 1. yes! Progesterone is used by the body to regulate the menstrual cycle; However, as I said, abnormally high levels of hormones like progesterone have been linked with cancers of the breasts and uterus. Women who have higher body fat % are also more likely to have higher levels of these hormones.
2. Yeah I did not suggest that if you marry an attractive person, you will get attractive kids. All I said was that you will increase your odds of getting attractive kids.
>>35546638 again all I'm saying are that the hormones that regulate the menstrual cycle have been linked to sexual cancers when they are in abnormally high levels. AND they have been seen in high levels in women with higher bf%.
Thread replies: 49 Thread images: 13
Thread DB ID: 394288
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at email@example.com with the post's information.