am I the only one who thinks bombers look better oversized? I

File: bomber.jpg (62KB, 400x600px)

62KB, 400x600px

>>9468434
I agree with you. I really like the puffy sleeve look.

Pic related is not as puffy as the original bombers but I think it's got the perfect amount of puffiness.

I wouldn't even call that a bomber. All it really has in common with an MA-1 is the collar. At that point, it's just a jacket.

File: 09_138648.jpg (80KB, 570x570px)

80KB, 570x570px

>>9468434
I agree completely.
My friend does have pic related from uniqlo though, and he wears it over a t shirt, the same way you'd wear a sweatshirt, and it looks great.

File: bamb.png (218KB, 390x513px)

218KB, 390x513px

>>9468476
okay good to have a little validation.

I want a cotton bomber, this one in particular, but because it's made 'slim' and has no structure to it, it looks like a zip up slim fitting sweater to me, doesn't look 'like a bomber'

think sizing up will help or is the issue the material going to persist
and make me look like
I'm wearing

a poorly fitting bomber inspired zipup sweater

>>9468434
>am I the only one who thinks bombers look better oversized
no.

>>9468492
seems kinda nice, hows the quality though (are there good alternatives to uniqlo)?

>>9468808
>>9468811
>>9468827
yeah I wear all three of these outside all the time

>>9468560
he's only had it for a few weeks but he wears it often enough that i'd say the quality is pretty good.

>>9468476
where2cop

>>9468434

They look like shit if they're too tight. Length wise I wouldn't want them too long though or else you're tip toeing on hoodrat territory