COP OR NOT

>>9230059

na, they look mediocre to me

File: Clarks-Naylor-Top-Tan-Leather-04.jpg (2MB, 2047x1365px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2047x1365px

Clarks naylor theyre 90 quid

File: Clarks-Naylor-Top-Tan-Leather-15 (1).jpg (1MB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1365px

>>9230100

>>9230100
They look a little too busy, the red and blue on the sole along with the contrasting browns and all the stitching puts me off
Not completely terrible though
>>9230104
They look better folded but once again the tartan seems a little much

File: afp6hfphljymcfmsv8tp.jpg (54KB, 620x400px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 620x400px

Wil Fry 'Expensive Jacket'

>>9230150
It's funny but I wouldn't wear it.

People aren't following the rule so I guess this thread is a failure lmao

File: nb.jpg (180KB, 952x1083px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 952x1083px

which one?

>>9230199
personally prefer the top one

File: 16356_909715799057760_3279932712430640052_n.jpg (180KB, 960x668px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 960x668px

Should I?

>>9230199
definitely the first one, dont like 420s generally though

>>9230224
looks alright

>>9230202
>>9230234
I was debating the green/orange pair because I keep hearing that new balances should have color and they're 10$ cheaper. I'm looking at the 420 model because its the closet thing nb does to a racing flat.

>w2c good looking racing flat?

File: $_57.jpg (92KB, 1182x1023px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 1182x1023px

Gotta go fast..?

>>9230059
>>9230100
nuh

>>9230150
hell nuh

>>9230199
top

>>9230253
no.

>>9230318
it's just for laffs m8

File: image.jpg (100KB, 640x957px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 640x957px

????

>>9230100
they're alright, but don't fold them down

File: S001C-Front-1000x1000.jpg (71KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 1000x1000px

pls help

http://stockwatches.com.au/shop/s001c/

File: $_57.jpg (172KB, 1600x1600px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 1600x1600px

Yay/nay? Nike NSW White Label

File: copornot.jpg (67KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 600x600px

>>9230028
should i buy these fa ?

>>9230999
cop
>>9231001
meh

>>9230372
nice
>>9230396
no
>>9230999
very nice
>>9231001
futuristic

http://www.aldoshoes.com/uk/en_UK/men/boots/formal-boots/c/232/HETHIN/p/34757191-97

Would these work with slim dark wool trousers?

>>9231008
that does not look futuristic by any standard.

>>9231005
n

File: 281672_mai.jpg (20KB, 514x514px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 514x514px

What do you think? Seems warm enough.


>>9231005
Nah.

>>9231001

Hell Nah

>>9230224

Yes

File: ornah.jpg (99KB, 400x266px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 400x266px

?????
it's Geller but I don't wanna buy it just bc it's designer

File: DQKtbLt.jpg (728KB, 2448x1836px) Image search: [Google]

728KB, 2448x1836px

>>9231007
>>9231008
>>9231018
>>9231025

aight thanks. Thoughts on the Inneva still? I've got a chance to cop some for $180.

>>9231025
that hoodie is hideous. Quilted clothing is horrible.

>>9231053
>nice knock-off flyknits anon!
personally I think they look nice though

File: 71227.jpg (563KB, 2000x2664px) Image search: [Google]

563KB, 2000x2664px

Thoughts?

>>9231046
looks nice
>probably

>>9231062
>that hoodie is hideous. Quilted clothing is horrible.

Stuck now...

Need a jacket under £100 that'll help me through winter and isn't a Parka.

Any suggestions on where to look?

what does 'cop or not' mean? new /fa/scist here

>>9231068
just get some NB 574 fag

>>9231093
cop = purchase

>>9231093
Purchase or not.
Acquire or abstain.

>>9231068
I agree with
>>9231099

the shoes you posted are obv nike's rip off of the classic NB style

>>9231093
cop = buy
not cop = don't buy
w2c = where to cop

File: ohgoodnoplsplsfagit.png (155KB, 620x532px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 620x532px

>>9231064
b-b-but i thought that roshe run woven was that

File: Filling-Pieces-Feature-LV-9370.jpg (313KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

313KB, 1024x683px

y/n?

>>9231151
a thousand times yes

>>9231099
>nearly 2015
>Getting NB.

>>9231151
those are boots buddy

you want boots?

cause they're boots

>>9231151
got to be the most bullshit sole ive seen, hell na

File: $_57.jpg (230KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 1600x1200px

?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Lacoste-White-Leather-Low-Top-Fashion-Sneakers-Size-11-5-Boat-Shoes-/281528286055?pt=US_Men_s_Shoes&hash=item418c64bb67

>>9231151
dope af

>>9230396
Def cop
>>9231005
Dnc
>>9231053
Cop

File: s7-1132898_lifestyl.jpg (748KB, 2000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

748KB, 2000x2000px

>>9230028

>>9231380
no

>>9230059
Ye>>9230372
Ye>>9231012
Depends>>9231430
Ye

File: u0lf3vpexnsr2tfdumuk.jpg (44KB, 469x474px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 469x474px

Pls help amigos, jacket fyi

File: 1310035352-06312300.jpg (112KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 1000x1000px

>>9231475
this instead?
>>9231380
or this?

File: captcha.png (16KB, 327x436px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 327x436px

>>9231490
>Depends>>9231430 (You)

on what

File: coppernaught.jpg (149KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 1024x1024px

>>9231019
>>9231025
>>9231402
another view, im sorely tempted

File: MIGN.jpg (47KB, 440x440px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 440x440px

y/n?

>>9231557
y if reasonably priced

>>9231521
i dig
if you like them then buy them...
brand?

>>9231611
>brand?
some kickstarter called hydrogen one

File: 18-12-2014_mki_cashmeremerinorollneckknit_grey_1_bm.jpg (214KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

214KB, 1000x1000px

Anyone got any experience with MKI? c/n?

File: 5f5ec356-ce74-4ee6-a32d-a665bf3d804e[1].jpg (43KB, 1000x439px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 1000x439px

thoughts?

File: 71HVcaJzKDL._UY606_.jpg (33KB, 465x606px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 465x606px

>>9231841
c/n?

>>9231845
sorry i didn't mean to link
pls forgive me

File: bfd5f30ab2244e6e8fd1e8333e0b5184[1].jpg (10KB, 300x250px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 300x250px

>>9231860
youre forgiven, and no id think that jackets a good cop, looks a little tacky and cheap, maybe look for a barbour or a fjallraven greenland jacket if youre looking for something in that vein

File: AW14_PM400886_000_C1.jpg (35KB, 417x417px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 417x417px

What do you think?

>>9231841
cop

also w2c because I've been looking for a pair with the navy tab in the premium version. Being amerifat is suffering

>>9231841
na
>>9231845
yes

File: 2235132[1].png (38KB, 185x247px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 185x247px

>>9231891
there's a pair in my local shoe shop what the fuck is wrong with your country that you cant even buy a basic model within 50 km or some shit
thats wack dude get out of there now bf its too late

>>9231902
Fug :DDD

The problem is that the only ones I can find are the shitty cheap ones with worse leather and the plasticy tab. Maybe if I lived in a more high fashion place I might find some stores with it, but I haven't found any or seen any shops. Oh well, cop anyways. They are still at a point where they are nice and clean looking and aren't going to crash into the ground like a lot of other meme sneakers.

Maybe I'll just keep hunting for the premium leather jack purcells...

>>9231915
fair nuf m8 av a good one

File: $_57.jpg (188KB, 1600x1195px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 1600x1195px

I love the Chelsea's aesthetics, but I am not sure. It will be my first

What do you think of this ones? I can cop it for like 50$.

File: seeley.png (82KB, 555x247px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 555x247px

If I was a size smaller I'd have an easier time finding shoes. Thoughts on these?

File: 48234892952.png (442KB, 466x480px) Image search: [Google]

442KB, 466x480px

but the print extends onto the ribbing
fall jumper

File: Screen Shot 2014-12-21 at 6.26.54 PM.png (109KB, 397x260px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 397x260px

I love these but I want some opinions first

Advice incoming

>>9232513
do not cop this
>>9232442
not
>>9232328
not
>>9231881
cop
>>9231845
cop
>>9231841
NOT
>>9231739
cop
>>9231557
cop
>>9231521
really depends, if they're relatively cheap I'd say cop

>>9232517
me

>>9232513
cop this
>>9232442
cop
>>9232328
cop
>>9231881
not
>>9231845
not
>>9231841
COP
>>9231739
not
>>9231557
not

File: 81gMB5dw6CL._UY600_.jpg (35KB, 596x600px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 596x600px

Cop for 120 instead of a pair of mono 1460s?

>>9232528

I am the Chelsea Boots guy.

Could you please explain why you didn't like them? Can you give a cheap alternative to them?

>>9232517
Not a fan >>9232517

>>9232577
Now that I'm taking a closer look, I change my mind. As long as you're wearing black jeans they could be pretty sick

File: rclubc.png (356KB, 1272x430px) Image search: [Google]

356KB, 1272x430px

Either of these?

>>9232586

So no dark blue jean? I was thinking of wearing it with black jean, but also with dark blue jeans.

White shirt, dark blue jeans and the chelseas. NO?

>>9232587
right if you really must
there are better shoes in that style for cheaper too though

>>9232641
>there are better shoes in that style for cheaper too though
Would you mind sharing which ones? Only reeboks came to mind.

File: royals.png (191KB, 588x414px)

191KB, 588x414px

>>9232587

>>9232645
literally every big sneaker company makes a similar design
NB, Nike, Adidas, Le Coq Sportif etc.
Just look up all of these brands and see what you like or go to a shoe store and try some on

>>9232513
w2c

>>9232666
weeb.net/a/ssholes

File: image1xxl[1].jpg (155KB, 870x1110px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 870x1110px

>>9232673

>>9232694
Shit I gave no explanation. I am looking for something along the lines of this (wool, similar shape maybe, a versatile color preferable) without the branding on the front and it's proving too difficult. Anyone know w2c something like it?

File: 078872_sub2.jpg (109KB, 820x1000px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 820x1000px

Thinking of copping this for the welfare range or getting a harrington from Ben Sherman in the cheap range.
>pls respond quickly

File: bestchaika.png (900KB, 870x1110px) Image search: [Google]

900KB, 870x1110px

>>9232708
you should have explained sooner

File: NtpJtBH[1].jpg (182KB, 975x1463px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 975x1463px

For only 100 dollhairs

>>9232864
Iffy, leaning towards naw

>>9232864
u cocksucker how about you state what you want, the hat, jacket, or shirt

File: pick2.jpg (136KB, 860x756px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 860x756px

Choose 2.

>>9232965
middle right

>>9232961
I thought it was fairly obvious, if I wanted the cap then I wouldn't have posted a picture up to the waist and if I wanted the shirt I wouldn't post a picture where most of it is covered by the jacket.
The jacket is what I want/am not sure about. Goes for like 70.

>>9232961

probably the jacket you autist