BACKPACK GENERAL
>>9188221
Camo backpacks were so 2012 don't do this OP
>>9188252
>>9188297
I forgot to say.
Those are some ugly ass backpacks.
But i guess you are fixate on that model, just get it.
>>9188306
I think they are pretty neat
Goes well with techwear
>>9188306
Post something you would buy
Maxpedition condor 2. It's tacticool, functional, quality and it looks nice
Better image
is this /fa/
>>9188359
>condor
>tactical
Gtfoh
>>9188221
This is by far the shittiest bag I have ever seen.
Fake MARPAT.
Stitching is obviously shit.
Even airshitters don't buy that crap.
inb4 MUH MIL-TEC
>>9188580
/K/ pls
w2c a bagpack similar to the black muji ?
>wearing MOLLE shit in civilian clothes
I will walk up to you and call you a faggot to your face.
>>9188693
i wish you would... i wear a molle pack for day to day.
>>9188221
Copped, thoughts?
As long as there's no loud ass camo then I think they look good. The functionality is nice too.
Anyone have the 5.11 Rush 12?
>>9188864
Looks nice.
How much did you pay for it?
>>9188864
I like it, any info on it?
(ill still prob stay plebe with my lil america herschel)
>>9188568
It's a good backpack m8.
visvim ballistic ?
>>9189163
Condor is 6/10
Not good, but not too bad either.
Beats paying overpriced non mil-spec stuff.
>>9189184
True dat
>>9188297
I have that Mil-tec one and I feel like it's more functional than fashionable, but I guess it does it's part in a techwear outfit. It is very /k/ommando-core though.
>>9188864
w2c?
If you're into the military thing LBX put one of their classic bags up for about $70.
You can get an extra 5% with NRA-LOD couponed in.
Visvim has some extremely aesthetic backpacks. I'd cop them if they weren't like 500euro.
>>9188864
Eastpaks are really cool but I l like the evarlane backpacks of that style
Looks more vintage, idk.
Does anyone have any recommendations on structured, Alexander Wang inspo backs?