>>8541826 >>8541821 >>8541816 no one outside of this board neither knows who RO/RS are or if they do, they recognize they are shitty "mainstream high fashion" designers. Basically, they're the kind of people newbies love, not actual fashionistas.
>>8541846 You literally have the most uninformed opinions I have ever seen. Those designers are world class and respected just as much, both have proved their knowledge and skill. Every board put there respects them and most posters wear them a lot. So no you are horribly wrong.
>>8541868 There is no proof of that and you're going to go dip up threads, fits, and images from mfa, ct, sufu, etc. which proves my point. The only people who like Rick Owens and Raf Simons are people who just got into fashion. I'm speaking from experience, kid, so please don't be offended. I say that you should lay off the Rick/Raf runway pics and learn about more designers.
>>8541891 Most of my runway pics are on my phone, I can make a zip of them if you would like. There are some Raf but not to many the rest are from many different designers. Would you like to give me proof to tour discussion? Because I really don't agree with what your saying.
Rick and Raf are held in very high regard among many designers, media members, etc. Not just because of the strong designs that they produce, but because of the culture they have managed to create among their brands. The director of the house I work for often wears Rick / Raf, same with many, many high-level media execs.
Sorry buddy, I'm sure that on some planet your opinions are spot-on, but your weak link is, this is Earth.
>>8541969 There are maybe like a hundred pictures of Rafs FW14 because I really liked it and made a thread here about it. I have no idea what your talking about when you say atheistic subtext. That still leaves at least 450 or so pictures that aren't Raf. As for being recent am I supposed to have only like pre 2000s stuff? Most of my favorite designers weren't around then, or didn't have their own house.
>>8541989 Could you explain how. Your argument is extremely weak, you have given no evidence to your knowledge of fashion while everyone who is arguing against you has. I guess you could say I'm a little confused.
>>8541977 Right, because doxing yourself is common practice on 4chan.
>>8541969 >>8541983 Are we really gonna say the pictures you have saved to your drive are a judge of what you like? Amongst, again, 4chan posters?
I kinda try to get up "inspo folders" when I get a new computer/drive, but I give up, fast. I'm very good at keeping track of sources in my head, and 90% of the time I just go back to where I found it online when I want to look at something. If I save something, it's usually to show it to someone else, in an e-mail or forum discussion or something.
Anyway, >>8541891, please: tell us who people in the Deep Fashion are dressed in, and what your critique of Rick Owens and Raf Simons is. And demonstrate, with pictures or references, what it is you're talking about.
My ego wishes that I could provide proof, but I'm out of the studio today and all I have on me is a handful of emails (that you will no doubt will claim are forged) and a digital copy of our SS14/15 lookbook (Because we are based in Australia) that isn't being released to the public until late August. Regardless, I don't want my identity revealed so you'll just have to take my word.
Feel free to ask questions that only "an insider" would know, and make your decision from that.
>>8541999 >There are maybe like a hundred pictures of Rafs FW14 >Most of my favorite designers weren't around then, or didn't have their own house.
Those are the most incriminating things you've posted.
>>8542020 >Right, because doxing yourself is common practice on 4chan. It is actually. Convenient for you to get samefag back up because you know you can't prove you're an actual industry worker (what does that even mean?). You're probably just some "sales associate" for Acne or some crap like that.
>please: tell us who people in the Deep Fashion are dressed in, and what your critique of Rick Owens and Raf Simons is. And demonstrate, with pictures or references, what it is you're talking about.
Now you're just trying to change the argument back to me because you have no proof that you're an "industry worker."
>>8541805 Rick was popular before all those niggers even started dick ridding goth ninja. Hell before goth ninja even became a thing on /fa/. We would call it darkstyle you new fag.
>>8541787 Patrick was occasionally discussed on /fa/ in it's infancy and palewave shit is just so forced it's sad knowing you fags regurgitate what ever one dipshit reports over and over. Just like dadcore a term forced my /mu/ onto /fa/ and all the jackasses replacing saying menswear with that shit.
>>8541977 It's more pathetic you post like a retard against someone else opinions even if they are right.
>>8541989 Thank you for being a piece of shit. You're a waste of space on /fa/
>>8542051 Raf is one of my favorite designers I'm sorry if that makes me a pleb. As for the young designers am I only supposed to like YSL, DIOR, and Balnegacia and others like that. YSL isn't even around technically and none of the older houses interest me. You still have yet to back up anything. All your doing right now is beating around the bush and projecting.
Please stop thinking the Anons are me. I'm keeping the name on - more than one person thinks you are wrong.
I work full-time in communications and public relations (I wish I was in sales, they earn the big money) for a fairly well-known Australian womenswear label. Because our team is small, it would be obvious who I am - so my details and my brand name is out of the question.
Nice assumption. I'm not that fag, but he's been making that folder since /fa/ was dick ridding Tom Brown, Heidi and mens wear thinking it made them look cool alongside goth ninja. Before all the ace trips left and before all the cheap retards took over and bitched that everything was to expensive.
This isn't a tantrum by the way and I could careless, since you're to brain dead to simply stop yourself. I'm browsing a current thread, so it's doesn't matter to me if you keep replying or not. The threads dead anyways thanks to you and at least I know people can keep reading your redundant replies with no actual substance.
>>8542948 >>Nice assumption. I'm not that fag lol so you jumped into a conversation and then got mad over it? what's wrong with you. not even bothering to read the rest of your post since i know it's just going to be you sperging out and failing to follow the conversation
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at [email protected] with the post's information.