[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Home]
4Archive logo
kinda new getting into fa stuff...
If images are not shown try to refresh the page. If you like this website, please disable any AdBlock software!

You are currently reading a thread in /fa/ - Fashion

Thread replies: 12
Thread images: 4
kinda new getting into fa stuff...

what is the objective best white sneaker? not looking to spend more then $300
>>
>>10961608
My nigga you can buy a good pair of white shoes for 90 dollarys doos then spend the other 210 on things that make the shoes work great together
>>
File: cp.jpg (20 KB, 455x475) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
cp.jpg
20 KB, 455x475
>>10961608
Common Projects originals
>>
>>10961615
which do you recommend or r u the guy above me?
>>
>>10961646
Depends on your style my guy if you want a clean/fuckboy look get stan smiths which are pretty big right now so you won't have to worry about losing labels just yet. If you want to get extra into the hipster look get cdg converse, since you have that much dough to throw around
>>
What the fuck.
Did you really just say objective
>>
>>10962017
don't do this. mostly because i (an internet stranger) will laugh at you
>>
File: 8805036_f520[1].jpg (31 KB, 520x246) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
8805036_f520[1].jpg
31 KB, 520x246
>>10961608
there is no objectively best sneaker. It's a preference thing, so you buying what you like is going to be what's best for you.
However, you're prolly referring to people who have been into fashion for a while and you generally shift preferences a bit the longer you've been interested.

I think Converse Jack Purcell look great, they don't look like every other shoe with their distinctive look and they have a nice silhouette. Also they aren't very expensive.

I have a pair of Converse Jack Purcells as well as a pair of >>10961619 Achilles, both are good options but the JPs will set you back ~100$ and the CPs will cost you 400$.

Go for whichever sneaker you think look the best and you can't go wrong - I recommend the Converse JP!
>>
>>10962081
However people in real life won't
>>
Common projects go with anything, if you don't want to pay full price you can find used pairs on grailed usually for cheaper
>>
>>10961608
If you want to find good clothes and shoes just search polyvore.
(My username on it is Cheapstyle, cuz I only pick cheap things because I act like a jew)
>>
Chuck 2 or Stan smiths
Thread replies: 12
Thread images: 4
Thread DB ID: 519927



[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Home]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at [email protected] with the post's information.