Minimalist Thread

File: minimal.jpg (10KB, 304x456px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 304x456px

you faggots dont even know real minimal

>>10919603
kek

File: kekkers.jpg (41KB, 396x549px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 396x549px

>>10919603

File: 1452658284978.jpg (408KB, 898x1998px) Image search: [Google]

408KB, 898x1998px

last time I started a /min/ inspo thread, the mod banned me for shilling for the /min/ board in the inifinity chan. But he mislabeled it as a ban for posting cp. so I appealed it, and here we are.

File: 929313_1045536742158978_689328379_n.jpg (90KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 1080x1080px

this chick is as hard-core as self-proclaimed minimalists chicks on youtube can be

https://www.instagram.com/rachelaust/

>>10919635
look at that wimpy rise, whew

minimalism is a plague

File: 1428747710903.jpg (465KB, 2041x2633px) Image search: [Google]

465KB, 2041x2633px

I dare you to point out one non-minimalist thing in this picture (besides his appetite)

>>10919592
w2c pants like this

>>10919635
actually looks like "strong douch from the gym"

>>10919677
bows on laces, very distracting

>>10919677
the grain on the door and the drawers

File: 856958334343.jpg (1MB, 2021x2585px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2021x2585px

memealist

>>10919732
good fit, but looks gay

>>10919754
I don't understand the context of this question. I will thusly ignore it.

>question

I meant statement, lol.

>>10919732
Thats a poorfag basicbitch prep fit. I dressed like that in 9th grade when i wanted to look "nice". The pants are ok.

>>10919773
I wonder if your opinion would change if instead of the Polo, it was a Raf Simons logo

>>10919786
Tbqh it would change if he wore the button down right and had more minimalistic shoes. Actually even if he had pink raf meme smiths on this fit would be alot better. Its hard to make polo actually work in a fit unless it's purple label

>>10919807
>had more minimalistic shoes.
>adding memes makes a fit better
blech

>>10919603
Is that a yeezus cd cosplay?

>>10919766
You really are a fag then. He's just saying that your fit makes you look homosexual, which it does. I still like the fit whether you're gay or not though.

>>10919786
Except raf doesnt splash his logo on the front of everything he makes for everyone to see its raf

>>10919857
but why does it matter whether the fit makes the person look gay or not...?

>>10919870
Hmm. I understand your concern about the stigma of the brand, yet with the outfit, it is merely an unobstructive piece of embroidery.

anyone have those "uniform" infographics

i.e. wear varsity jacket + shades of black shirts + black pants + leather shoes everyday

>>10919879
Oh I wasn't the one roasting you for wearing polo, I'm just saying that's not what raf does

>>10919677
Looks like he's in a cult/10

>>10919879
Its poor quality for the price. Its h&m tier and cant be justified. The logo isnt the problem it's the stigma behind the logo and all the fratbros wear the same sweat right now. No actual designers that take pride in their work would slap a logo on a perfectly fine peice anyways.

File: 147875_1.jpg (2MB, 1200x1800px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1200x1800px

>>10919870
>doesn't splash his logo
ok m8

>>10919635
You kinda have dad body, and the shirt makes you look like a greaser

>>10919811
You literally put memealist as the caption for your fit so you cant really say anything about meme clothing cause it doesnt actually matter if anything is a meme outside of the internet. you are most likely homosexual and definitely metrosexual by the way you dress and talk.

File: ss+(2016-02-05+at+02.22.04).jpg (32KB, 477x655px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 477x655px

>>10919870
lol

File: Raf-Simons-adidas-Originals-Stan-Smith-Spring-2015-Collection.jpg (231KB, 940x660px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 940x660px

>>10919870
Let's continue shall we

File: ss+(2016-02-05+at+02.22.19).jpg (29KB, 504x578px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 504x578px

>>10919870
Citation please

>>10919870

File: 1452135340941.gif (20KB, 150x160px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 150x160px

>>10919828
kek

>>10919933
>>10919949
>>10919955
>>10919958
>>10919967
I'm talking about his whole output, not just a couple pieces from just one collection, unlike polo, from which 95% of their clothing has some kind of easily visible logo on it

>>10919635
you look like jack kerouac's style during his younger days, which for most, it probably isn't a good thing.

>raf

>>10920052
its a diffusion line, of course it's going to have logos on it

just like all of rafs collabs and shit have logos on them

>>10920187
okay maybe not all but at least the sneakers and whatnot

>>10919732
>>10919590

Where can i find pants like these?

>>10919635
Dope phone though I have the same one

>>10919635
not particularly minimalist
there's a difference between simple and minimalist that most people don't seem to understand
minimalism embodies simplicity but also a no utile design with form following function
think dieter rams and helmut lang
jeans and a tee shirt is just boring