/Tech/ -TECHWEAR GENERAL

File: jacket.jpg (460KB, 1800x1800px) Image search: [Google]

460KB, 1800x1800px

bout to cop this jacket for $100

File: 005_6d780526-20bb-41c3-b8df-591ef5379d5a.jpg (757KB, 1715x1331px) Image search: [Google]

757KB, 1715x1331px

>>10909763
Looks kinda wack

do you have a model pic?

Just bought Outlier Futureworks. What do I expect

File: 49e9f4850d3ee18093371de0d471200e.jpg (60KB, 736x680px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 736x680px

>>10909771
it's a little normie-wear but i want to have a low-powerlevel outfit

>>10909771
ID on those pants/trousers? Or something identical if too expensive

>>10909732
that's a beautiful jacket. did some googling, doesn't look like its for sale anywhere :(

File: GG.jpg (131KB, 540x675px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 540x675px

>>10909864
Aitor does re releases of his products but are next to impossible to purchase. I had a conversation with Flying Lotus once about Throup and he said that AT couldnt even afford his own pieces.

The man is an artist before a clothing designer

>>10909837
Guerilla Group from SS14 if i can recall. Same pants as pictured

>>10909831
Im not vibing with it too much on him my man

>>10909775
my grail

>>10909732
ID on what he's wearing on his feet?

>>10909901
Aitors pants came with shoes attached

>>10909890
They aren't hard to find go buy one!

>>10909905
I'd have to take out another student loan

bit too poor to afford a coat like that atm

File: IMG_3798.jpg (104KB, 870x1262px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 870x1262px

http://www.mokkimies.com/mil-tec_combat_summer_anorak_olive
I want to buy this.

>Shell: 100% polyester microfiber
>Lining: 100% Polyester
What does this mean? Does it mean it's like sports jersey material?

File: 1452738035160.png (34KB, 196x197px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 196x197px

I bet you fags can't tech-wear in the summer.

>>10910086
>tfw

I tell my friends all the time how much a hate summer. Not even for techwear purposes, but I just own so many jackets. Hell, pants and long sleeves too, you just can barely wear depending on the weather. Shit, it can even ruin the soles of your shoes.

Fuck summer senpai

>>10910086
gr8 b8 m8

File: adidas-eqt-23-f15-athl-06_1.jpg (249KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 1280x1280px

Dropping these to $160 if anyone w2c

Could work with a select few techwear fits...obviously not black ones but you get the idea.

https://www.grailed.com/listings/340069

>>10910069
100% shit

>>10910069
It'll feel like shitty plastic

>>10909732
Just add the general guide and its fine. It literally contains most stufd people need.

Also do post scans. I wanna see if its worth a physical copy.

On the Cav Empt stuff - I feel weird about it. On one hand because people then move away from the #acrnm style fits when adopting techwear but I dont really consider the brand the stereotypical techwear brand with an emphasis on functionality but a streetwear brand. Cav Empt also looks much more easy to the eyes of regular people than SISP or Acronym. It seems like the aesthetic is being watered down. It did back in the mid 2000s and now its happening again. I hope this is a sign for subtle techwear being more mainstream at least.

post inspo please, I'm still not 100% sure what defines techwear

>>10911006
>>10909732
I think the brand is popular not as a "techwear" brand, but just adopted because the graphic tees and bandanas and shit appeal to the aesthetics of people into techwear, i.e. sci-fi nerds who grew up thinking about cyberspace.

That being said most people I know that mix Acronym and cav empt have been doing so for years, and have only just now become more visible because of the acronymjutsu account and the #acrnm tag being super hot these days.

>>10911021
cav empt is mall core crap tho
nothing tech about it

>>10911009
no is posting ur pic as inspo kid. dont u worry

>>10909732
Is that
P I Z Z O R N O ?

File: $_57.jpg (142KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 800x800px

w2c sick techwear poncho

File: 713eec02ac_w245 (1).jpg (86KB, 245x368px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 245x368px

>>10911030
Literally just said its not a techwear brand ya fuckin newb.

>>10911009
Hyper-practical shit made with synthetic fabrics.

File: UndercoverParka.jpg (44KB, 367x600px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 367x600px

>>10911080
>>10911021

I probably should have put the word "streetwear" in the op. Didnt mean to imply that they are techwear.

I love the aesthetic, its just kind of interesting that people have been actively against the brands usage in the #acrnym styles.

Also i have some shit to do right now so scans will be later.


Also Also let me Shill my upcoming EP
https://soundcloud.com/juxtpose/tsugu-06-preview-mix

>>10910281
>>10910424
That's a not cop then, thanks.

>>10910281
>>10910424
You do realize most shells are done from polyester and that just knowing the material tells fuck all about the clothe itself right?

w2c good cheap black techwear parka. looking for fucktons of pockets under $100.

>>10911978
>good
>cheap

pick one

>>10911910
Can anyone recommend non-acronym type techwear brands? Like Outlier or Final Home

>>10910086
unnecessary and doesnt exist
some fag will post an asian kid wearing a full techwear outfit but with shorts and say its for summer

File: boots.jpg (125KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 1000x1000px

which 1?

Or other suggestions?

>>10912560
sorel is cheap china-wear now. As usual the pics look cooler than the IRL.

>>10910086
merino tee, cuffed nylon pants, decent boots or sneakers, chacos if you're feeling saucy

60/40 anorak if it rains

bomp

>>10909763
plz dont

>>10912504
It's all in OPs link

>>10909871
>AT couldnt even afford his own pieces
What does that mean? The production costs is too high or what?

>Guerilla Group from SS14
These pants are hideous. I feel bad for anyone who fell into GG meme.

>>10909732
>adoption of Cav Empt as the go to brand for internet techninjas
Shit's weak. Not because CE is bad, they actually have great visual style thanks to sk8thing,but because they 'invented' sort of dress code for techwear and now every fuccboi trying to be that mysterious techninja on ig. Basically they fucked acronym's brand image and Erlsn helped them when he started working on ACG aka worst shit ever.

>>10911006
> looks much more easy to the eyes of regular people than SISP
You're wrong.

>>10911910
acrnm has the style and the function, cav empt has just the style. At least for me, techwear defines itself mostly by its functionality, thus cav empt is by no means tech. Other people however may just go for the cybergoth/sharpHackerDewd look and it may work for them.

>>10913993
lmao where did u find this?

File: Screen Shot 2016-02-03 at 12.23.49.png (568KB, 700x699px) Image search: [Google]

568KB, 700x699px

>>10914012
#acrnm on ig is full of gems

>>10913993
>>10914047
> haven't reached the toilet in time

>>10913993
Would've been a decent execution had he chose good glasses and a better haircut. Skin is a bit pale too, but whatever desu

>>10914047
those nike tech fleece pants only work if you are like under 10% body fat. i tried them when i was a bit over weight and they looked like this dude. so shit. then i dropped weight and got lean and they looked better
baggy joggers or cargos are better for this look if you aren't super lean

File: Unknown.jpg (144KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 1080x1080px

>>10914056
What you're talking about? Whole fit is messed up, pants are too big compared to jacket, which is too short in this case. Shoes are off, he is wearing them just because #acrnm.

>>10914089
always hated these acronym bags. way less functional than a backpack.
so there's some facebook group of ancronym dudes posting this autistic shit? why not on superfuture? seems to be a lot of these morons there too

>>10914093
Well most of these kids' hobby is "fashion"

And they're stuck in the mentality that you dress a certain way if you want a certain lifestyle eg "dress jock, dress preppy, dress punk"

So they think that in order to represent their hobby they need a few key meme pieces and to look over the top and ridiculous to telegraph that they're "into clothes"

It's the same thing with the Rick Owens sneaker fad its a sense of belonging

>>10914176
>sense of belonging
well said

>>10913959
Yeah prod cost is insane apparently

File: tumblr_nmxoyg5K8s1qe5o8zo1_1280.jpg (751KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

751KB, 1024x1024px

>>10914093
I'm curious why you hate them. I was in the same camp until I got a 3A-1 and it flipped my opinion completely.

>>10913959
What stands out the most about CE is the branding and with the popularity of streetwear, people are used to shit with logos and brand names. SISP is styled very aggresively and people aint used to that.

File: stone-island-shadow-project-ss16-06-550x800.jpg (46KB, 550x800px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 550x800px

>>10914783
SISP is pretty tame though. Most people wouldn't think twice about it if you passed them in the street.

>>10914320
why would you buy it if you disliked it

>>10915013
hookups

>>10914320
The only real reason I could see is that they are just heavily modified heavily up charged Bagjack Bags

That and the proliferation through the whole scene making it seem like there's only one option for a tech wear messenger

Fun fact: If you email bagjack you can get an almost 1 to 1 remake of a 3a-5ts for around 380$

File: nike-lupinek-acg-white-1.jpg (79KB, 940x660px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 940x660px

what to wear with?

>>10915201
I mean, you could make the same exact argument for a lot of shit, shoes especially (see: any adidas x collab).

Plus I'm not super familiar with bagjack, but can you get limonta or x-pac?

>>10915240
I don't know off hand but probably

>>10915311
>Fun fact: If you email bagjack you can get an almost 1 to 1 remake of a 3a-5ts for around 380$

>I don't know off hand but probably

If it doesn't have the material it's nowhere near 1 to 1, and if you don't know off the top of your head how do you make the first claim?

File: 9781851773435.jpg (14KB, 400x430px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 400x430px

>>10909732
>Super Modern Wardrobe
B-b-but s-senpai, you promised...

>>10910015
you can get the real ones for like 100 bucks

issey miyake windcoats predate the final home ones by about a decade and the final home designer used to work for issey miyake before launching his own label

>>10911910
laser have you ever found the full scans from mens non-no for the first Earmuff Maniac season

>>10915767
SCANNUNG RUGHT BOW

IVE BEEN BUSY

>>10915784
I've seen them but never saved

SCANNER ISNT BEING COOPERATIVE

File: F15_Veilance.jpg (164KB, 1965x2634px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 1965x2634px

>>10915785
>>10915805
chill, don't let an icelandic lawn gnome painting forum stress you out

File: Issey Travel Bomber.jpg (3MB, 3306x4400px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3306x4400px

>>10915823
Lol

I got a couple coming rn, i have work in 10min so ill try to get a couple more done by then.

File: Issey Travel Bomber 1.jpg (3MB, 3306x4400px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3306x4400px

>>10915829
CP COMPANY KITE PONCHO

File: CPCOMPANY KITE.jpg (1MB, 2478x3300px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2478x3300px

>>10915834
dropping to 300 dpi now

File: Vexed Generation.jpg (1MB, 2478x3300px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2478x3300px

>>10915841

File: Maharishi Camo.jpg (2MB, 2478x3300px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2478x3300px

>>10915857
Interestingly there is a whole chapter practically dedicated to Maharishi's various camo designs

>>10915868
That's all for tonight

>>10915767
I can scan a few pages too if laser needs help

>>10909732
What are some usefull gadget like the fuelband or miband?
Where i can find them?
Gadgets with sleep monitoring gets extra points

>>10914089
What are those shoes?

>>10909732
When the FUCK is aitor throup going to release more clothing? There was a veil jacket up on ebay for 2,500 about a year ago but I haven't really seen any other pieces since...

>>10915841
just upload the whole thing to zippyshare or google drive at once

File: Stone-Island-Shadow-Project-Gore-Tex-Paclite-Stealth-Trench-Coat-2.jpg (52KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 800x800px

>>10914093
>way less functional than a backpack
It depends. I find 5TS and 6TS too big and uncomfortable for carrying heavy things compared to backpack. But if you need smaller one to carry iPad, keys, wallet, bottle of water and such then 3TS or -1 are great ones. I sold my 5TS due that reason when i found Bagjack x Shadow, this shit is next level compared to Acronym.

>>10914783
You can't even compare CE to SISP, they're from different worlds. SISP is styled way better and more acceptable than CE. SISP is next level clothing that doesn't scream 'look at me', CE on the other hand heavily depends on graphics and bold colors.

>>10915201
5TS is modified bagjack messenger in the first place, they're almost identical, except: olive straps, materials, spanish quick releases and webbing. Thats pretty much it. Both are shitty messengers for cycling.

>>10915981
Dude what the fuck. Those are all black Y3 Qasa's

>>10915989
You need to contact his office and order them personally. Some pieces are floating around though, guy from SUFU bought those pants from op-pic recently.

>>10916309
Just curious, what makes them shitty for biking? Poor balance?

File: tumblr_nvx7exkR0T1qb6n6eo1_1280.jpg (249KB, 721x1080px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 721x1080px

>>10916309
>pants from op-pic recently
Messed up, he bought different pants, pic related (~900USD)

>>10916334
Yes, you need to fix bag position constantly while riding, which is annoying as hell. Not that bad as Visvim Ballistic E-Cat though, but not good as generic cycling messenger bag or regular backpack.

File: IMG_4551.jpg (1MB, 2448x3264px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2448x3264px

Solid Snakes x Maharishi S/S 16

File: mission workshop detail.jpg (68KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 640x480px

>>10916309
Do you know the Mission Workshop messengers?
How do they compare to Acrnm and Bagjack X SISP?

File: 1393582656255.png (98KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 600x600px

>>10916836
> socks & sandals

File: 61i3Ta7stkL._SL1500_.jpg (76KB, 1035x1500px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 1035x1500px

>>10911072
http://www.amazon.com/Poncho-Villa-Technical-Soft-Shell-Hazard/dp/B00U9YKHOQ

grail poncho, 100 buckaroos though

File: l_03-1.jpg (53KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 600x450px

>>10917177
I don't like the brand personally, but judging from the photos, messengers are way more suitable for cycling.

>Acrnm and Bagjack X SISP
They have identical strap systems, so they both suck. However, bagjack x shadow is smaller than 5ts and more advanced from design standpoint, it was my grail basically.

>>10917177
>>10917434
I have handled a MW Monty (small messenger) for some days and am waiting for my Rommy to arrive. It is incredible comfy to carry, even with higher loads, and the strap system with the big metal thingies is simply genius. It looks sufficiently techy, but not spaced out

>>10917335
i need this in OD. Black and coyote are both cool, but fuck this quality in OD is hard to come by

>>10917335
This is sick, too bad its not water proof tho

File: rains-black-windbreaker-anorak-jacket-in-black-product-1-22034861-2-082489512-normal.jpg (223KB, 730x1095px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 730x1095px

should I cop this Rains anorak

>>10918426
That's weird, it says both 100% waterproof, and water-resistant...unless they mean the -seams- are 100% waterproof.

Either way, what's the point of a poncho that's not waterproof? Breathability is never an issue with ponchos, so it might as well be waterproof.

>>10918426

"100% waterproof fully-taped seams throughout"

wut?

>>10918504
>>10918512

> 100% waterproof fully-taped seams throughout
> Main Material: Water-resistant breathable softshell

Water-resistant material isn't the same as waterproof, the low reviews say if you're in the rain for more than an hour you're wearing a soggy blanket. Oh well, I guess /fa/ wears mostly for aesthetics anyways

File: Techninja.jpg (106KB, 750x500px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 750x500px

bamp

>>10918576
this
Making a poncho out of softshell really is bullshit

>>10919361
>Item weight: 2 pounds

And then there's that. Ponchos are supposed to be light, dammit.

>>10910100
>this
I own jackets
I want to wear them all
cant
Cali heat is a drag, yo.

File: arcteryx-veilance-02.jpg (943KB, 2000x1115px) Image search: [Google]

943KB, 2000x1115px

Arc'teryx Veilance is so fucking beautiful. They got the hyper minimalism with a heavy utilitarian focus look down to a science. People living in a perfect, utopic future will look straight out of an Arc'teryx Veilance editorial. Its techwear fashion in its purest form. There's no ambitions of looking like a cyberpunk hacker, just the perfect harmony between functionality and fashion.

File: techone.jpg (351KB, 2048x2048px) Image search: [Google]

351KB, 2048x2048px

Thoughts on Nike tech wear, specifically these new tapered pants?

>>10919814
w2c?

>>10919821

http://shop.havenshop.ca/collections/nike-sportswear

Whole collection can be viewed here, anon.

>>10919693
>Its techwear fashion in its purest form
>There's no ambitions of looking like a cyberpunk hacker
pick one

>>10919973
Techwear is simply just technical clothing mixed with fashion you autist not cyberpunk ninja hacker/acronym shit.

>>10920183
>Techwear is simply just technical clothing mixed with fashion
which translates to
>i have no idea of what i'm talking about and only started browsing here in 2015
the 'tech' in techwear has, until recently, always meant technological, it wasn't until anorak wearing chucklefaggots like you started ruining techwear that it changed from what was essentially rainproof avant-garde to sadboys esque garbage

>>10920183
lmao veilance is good? it's oveprriced meme shit
just because you can't afford acronym doesn't mean it is shit. it's just a different aesthetic. but rest assured acronym is multiple tiers above veilance in both technical functionality and aesthetic
>muh minimalism, lets just take arxteryx shit and put it in all black and removall all the detailing
>good
lmao you're lost son

>>10920214
>>10920224
THIS!
Sick of the tryhards from sufu's urban techwear circle jerk trying to push the Veilance bandwagon so hard. It's overrated. End of story.

>>10920214
What the hell does Veilance have to do with sadboys? Techwear has always been an extremely broad term, and the only people I've ever seen try to narrow it down to "looks like Acronym" is idiots on /fa/.

File: nike-bnd-woven-pant-the-one-black-727344-010-2.jpg (207KB, 2500x1667px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 2500x1667px

>>10919838

I feel like only skinny people can pull off these tapered sweats. Or haven clothespins the pants in their pictures. Look at this guy...shit looks wack on anyone with the slightest outward hip curves.

>>10914062

How overweight were you? % BF?

File: image.jpg (66KB, 420x560px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 420x560px

Not sure if this is techwear but I bought on a limb and wanted to see if any of you knew what the hell would look good with this pants wise

Is being dressed by the internet, techwear?

>>10920322
15% around

File: Unknown-1.jpg (136KB, 1080x1349px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 1080x1349px

>>10920214>>10920224>>10920228
At one point i owned 6 Acronym jackets at once and I have to say that Veilance is pure techwear and Acronym isn't 'more' technical, Veilance patterns are bit better since they have a lot more experience with their main line. I still love Acronym, but that doesn't mean that Veilance is
>oveprriced meme shit
Acronym became meme after ACG and Nike collaborations, thats for sure. 95% of people who wear Veilance doesn't look like cyberpunk-gater-on-ma-face meme faggots aka picrelated.

>>10920749
>veilance
>not memed dressed by the internet shit
k bro. acronym is the PINNACLE of techwear. always has been. always will be. it will never be topped and all brands like veilance can try their best to immitate them but they will NEVER come even close
stay jealous i guess ;)

>>10920214
>arc'teryx veilance is waterproof sadboys stuff
Yeah, I'm the one who just started following fashion. Yung Lean and his gang dress in a nostalgic 90s fashion way and not in anyway that looks like a Veilance editorial.

>techwear is rainproof avant-garde
Again, techwear isn't rainproof avant-garde (I hope you used that word ironically) but simply technical garments mixed with fashion. Stop holding down the subgenre into your own narrow definition of it.

Veilance, again, looks straight out of one's vision of a utopic future and it doesn't scream this idea, only doing it subtly and with an extreme degree of precision unlike Acronym which screams "look at me I'm a cyberpunk hacker ninja" and that screaming is met with people lacking any sort of depth at all enjoying the clothing brand.

>>10920224
Have you owned or touched either jackets? Acronym always felt a lot more flimsy to my hand than Veilance especially in the zippers. The popularity of Veilance is techwear people wanting an alternative to the Acronym.

Plus Veilance isn't all black without Arc'teryx branding. You're clearly clueless here. They make many pieces with color unlike Acronym which is just the same colors all the time and the pieces have a major step up in quality and feel compared to their mainline.

Also, how is Acronym "multiple tiers above" Veilance? If we're taking about pure functionality and utility, which one has the needless amounts of pockets/zips between the two? Which one has a history and heritage as a huge outdoors brand (allowing for more r&d)? Which one is tacked on with features that try and help the user but only really hold them back?

>>10920228
Why shouldn't the Veilance bandwagon be pushed? Should techwear just be the same #acrnm bullshit all the time? Look at that hashtag to see how people have destroyed the brand by making the shittiest possible fits with the most money.

>>10920840
Please explain how, in any way/shape/form, is Acronym the pinnacle of techwear.

>>10920898
you've been drinking the koolaid
there is no hope for you if you can't see it

i own 3 Veilance pieces myself. Quality is TNF-tier (not bad at all but not top quality by any stretch)

at the prices they charge for what is just stripped down black polyester knock offs of their mainline gear, it should be top of the line
but it is sadly not

Veilance is the Lexus of the techwear world. They are trying to disguise a Toyota as a luxury car by putting the right look, but underneath it is still a run of the mill grocery getter

Acronym is a ferrari. all performance and prestige the whole way

>>10920840
What the fuck you're talking about? Techwear is clothing for urban environment that have outdoor properties. Veilance is way more suited for that, thats definition of techwear. (Current) Acronym is more avant-garde and thats why i like it more.

>they will NEVER come even close
Both brands use pretty much same top tier fabrics or do you think that gravity pocket, escape zips or slings are next level shit? Or clothes from Epic that look like shit after 12 months of use?

>stay jealous i guess ;)
Jealous of what? My wardrobe is literally 70% Acronym, or i should be jealous that i'm not trying to look like cyberpunk memeboi from the dystopian future?

You sound like faggot who discovered ACR few months ago and bought used jacket from grailed. I'm trying to be objective without entering brainwashed fanboy territory. I love Acronym and always will, but that doesn't mean that Veilance is
>oveprriced meme shit
And i currently don't even own any of Veilance jackets and not planning to buy one.

>>10920959
I own a few pieces of Veilance and only ever handled Acrnm before in store, but I don't consider Veilance to be on Acrnm's level either. I think Veilance's performance has been way over blown by a select few on Superfuture such as Inksurgent and Ignosity who don't really know what they are talking about. As Superfuture is now dead and techwear as a movement has expanded throughout the net, this meme has somehow still survived. But as more and more people experience Veilance the more obvious it becomes how lacking it really is.

>>10920914
I own plenty from both brands and find the quality to be about the same. The only real difference is that Arcteryx will replace your stuff for free if it breaks or wears out before it should.

nice to seeing the sufu memesters are in a full force this morning...

>>10919693
You should check out Devoa, it's not techwear really but if you think Veilance did utilitarian minimalistic look well you haven't seen shit yet.
It's like futuristic Nazis: The brand

>>10920971
This.

>>10920985
I know about Devoa. I just feel OK about it.

do any of you actually wear this shit? or just shit post on forums about "quality"
i dont ever see fits except catalogue model shots from acg or acronym

>>10920307

Agreed, the calves look pretty awkward, also. Is this a model pic from the link to Haven?

>>10909732
I want these clowns off Cav Empt immediately.

File: 1404936071950.jpg (71KB, 360x326px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 360x326px

>>10920224
lol

>>10920421

Hopefully you didn't pay too much for it. Anyway, it'll look okay with any dark pant, preferably black.

>>10921001
have you even looked at this thread

>>10920914
Dude, where's all the hate coming from?
Veilance is objectively not NTF-tier, even arc'teryx lifestyle is clearly above NTF.
I agree it is overpriced. But the rest of your statement is oblivious rambling. Get yourself a coffee and a croissant (or local equivalent) and come the fuck down.

Veilance and Acronym follow so completely different visions, their design decisions are almost contradictory. Acronym gives you get-your-shit-done-no-matter-what utilitarian performance. If for you techwear is utilitarian performance, Acrnm is the shit.
Veilance strives for the clean, utopian lifestyle. Few of their pieces are even meant to be waterproof. But they still use unique cuts, fabrics and high tech production techniques to give their pieces specific properties. That does not mean it's all conditions gear. It isn't. It is not meant to be.

Just get it into your fucking head that fashion is not one-dimensional and techwear is just an umbrella term. Some even consider Miyake techwear.

>>10921174
you dont even know the difference between "come" and "calm" so why he gonna listen u man?

>>10921217
REKT

File: pls no acrnms.png (88KB, 602x589px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 602x589px

>>10920840
>>10920224
>>10920228
>>10920914

>muh feels, hidden beneath my hardshell cyber punk ninja hacker exterior

File: image.jpg (78KB, 747x614px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 747x614px

>>10919973
>>10920214
>>10920224
>>10920840

reminder that even errolson doesn't want acronym to be labeled techwear. acronym's great, but saying it's the pinnacle techwear brand is fucking stupid (and this is coming from someone with several acr pieces)

>>10921236
errolson is a god
veilance is uninspired shit
to the dude keeps calling it "utopia" you realize its just the same arcteryx base and they remove the detailing right? uninspired rip off and you dumb ass just keepeating it up!

>>10921249
jesus christ

everything is just going over your head isn't it

>>10921174
is the only one who knows what he's talking about

File: caffe italiano coffee and croissant.jpg (70KB, 425x282px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 425x282px

>>10921249

File: 92f2d8b5979ad6a0dc56e24b7447177f.jpg (23KB, 500x623px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 500x623px

>>10920421
What state are you in, where did you get it? Been eyeing one for months, hope you didn't nab it.

>>10920421
I'd say grey or white pants and red & white/grey sneaker. Pick up that 80s vibe.

>>10920421
Wear it while on a run. Any other context makes you look tryhard.

Anyone who has experience with Acronym jackets, care to enlighten me about the fit on their jackets? I'm 6ft 4" and just ordered GT-J27 in XL since I mostly wear XL on other clothing because I have really broad shoulders and have hard time fitting in the ones sized L. The slimmer silhouette ones, such as Arcteryx' active fit ones tend to be pretty good on me despite still being a bit loose on the waist.
>>tldr
>>Will Acronym's size XL jacket on a 6ft 4" guy with 33" waist look like a trash bag?

>>10921249
Get off Errolson's dick. If you can't recognize the great design in Veilance then I don't know how we can proceed with this argument. Techwear isn't what you want it to mean but what others want it to mean. Calling something that's waterproof techwear is just going about it wrong. Its all about the TECHNOLOGY that went behind the process, hence techwear.

>>10921174
This. I'm that Miyake guy.

>>10921531
IIRC they have measurements online. Use those.

>>10915981
OH HAHAHAHAHAHHA
YOU MUST BE NEW HERE
LURK MORE NEWFAG

>>10920246
>What the hell does Veilance have to do with sadboys?
neo-tech essentially just looks like sadboys.
a single rainproof piece, usually a jacket, paired with a shitton of pieces that have nothing tech-y about them
>Techwear has always been an extremely broad term
not really
>the only people I've ever seen try to narrow it down to "looks like Acronym" is idiots on /fa/
which translates to
>i have no idea of what i'm talking about and only started browsing here in 2015

>>10920898
> Yung Lean and his gang dress in a nostalgic 90s fashion way and not in anyway that looks like a Veilance editorial
faggot not once did i mention veilance, i've been talking about the neo-tech bullshit that's been popular here in the past couple of years

and my point with sadboys is that neo-tech fits and sadboys fits are literally the exact same, usually a rainproof anorak with ill fitting pants and autism shoes
>techwear isn't rainproof avant-garde but simply technical garments mixed with fashion
>Stop holding down the subgenre into your own narrow definition of it
nigga
>Veilance, again, looks straight out of one's vision of a utopic future and it doesn't scream this idea, only doing it subtly and with an extreme degree of precision unlike Acronym which screams "look at me I'm a cyberpunk hacker ninja" and that screaming is met with people lacking any sort of depth at all enjoying the clothing brand
this translates to
>people that like what i like are smart, people that like what i don't like are stupid dumb poopyheads
not once before this post have i mentioned veilance or acroynm

>>10921888
If you can't attack their argument, attack their credibility.

>>10921911
If you google Yung Lean or Sadboys and check any photo of anyone who says that they dress in a techwear sort of manner, you'd see tremendous differences. Lurk more anon

The definition I gave is as broad of a definition of techwear there is while being discrimatory enough and not just the cyberpunk hacker ninja you circlejerk

Also, I never said that people who like Acronym are dumb and people who like Veilance are smart but simply explained why I prefer one brand over the other. Don't put words in my mouth

good thread guys

>>10921089
Nah only $20
>>10921485
Texas
I saw it at TJ Maxx and shit a brick
>>10921502
Thought about that too, probably will, pretty good functionally and I run about 15 miles a week

>>10921485
>>10923457
Also may be willing to give you a better deal if I don't keep. It's an L though I'm a bit bigger (190)
It's kinda tight but I'll shed the weight then wear it

>>10909732
Hey OP wheres the full scan of Supermodern Wardrobe?

>>10923463
Fuuuuuck mine was a tx tjmaxx. Was a small though so might not be the same.

>>10923665
It was in Wylie (Dallas area)

>>10921495
You think they gotta be Nike? Because I may cop some raf x adidas because it'd be a good match

>>10910242


WHAT ARE THOOOOOOOOSE

File: her-joaquin-phoenix-31.jpg (313KB, 2400x1350px) Image search: [Google]

313KB, 2400x1350px

Veilance shit kind of reminds me of the way they dress in 'Her'.

is techwear okay for extreme manlets or will it look goofy like everything else

>>10923839
so much this
autism to the max

>>10923839
wtf no its so fucking far

>>10923867
just dont wear long coats and tuck in boots and youre fine

>>10923730
If you even consider wearing anything else than Nike end yourself right now!!!!!!!
No seriously, are you an insecure underage or what?

>>10923867
Will look goofy like everything else. Even for tall people it's not easy to pull off

File: Native_Shoes_1_4-5d27fc5b93621ad8c55e09ab49a1.jpg (53KB, 640x704px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 640x704px

What shoes to wear with Veilance?
I figured Puma X Chalayan, Muro.exe or Native would work, but are there other options? Especially with the last two options I fear poor durability. Also, only the muros can be had in water resistant.

Not exactly a /tech/ person but could anyone recommend a good black parka that'll keep me warm (not too thin) that'd be versatile with many fits not only techwear?

>>10919814
Thanks bro

>>10924174
Only reason I considered it was because there's no shoe in stock or I can find on grailed my size that matches, but I'm still digging

>>10923867
how short are we talking?

>>10924887
5'5 90lbs

>>10925174
If you're rail thin you could pull it off. The panther moderns were your height. Tech as fuck.

>>10925174
Start lifting anon. Techwear looks best at athletic builds

File: 1454734791542.jpg (42KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 640x480px

>>10924244

Muro exe are surprisingly water resistant, I was loading up a car in the rain last night and stood in a pretty deep puddle almost up to my ankles. Thought I'd be fucked with the cotton looking material but whatever treatment they did on these worked a treat

>>10925241
ottermode maybe but if you have a V-shaped torso it really fucks up the silhuette.

>>10909763
holy shit this looks exactly like the jacket I bought for 79 euros at a dumpstore only I got two patches with it, one of which I removed because it had an Airsoft reference.

>>10925333
>v shaped meme
anon pls

techwear fits are extremely bulky and being ottermode makes it look like youre wearing something 2 sizes too big

>>10924306
Recs?

Tips on tech wear hoodie? Cotton-nylon blend fabric

>>10926145
I'd go for merino wool

>>10925773
We are not your search engine. Do your research and come back if you have a concrete question

any good gloves? ill be overseas for work a couple of months and can't seem to find anything

>>10923940
>implying Her didn't have the best fits of any movie in the last decade

>>10927425
Arcteryx?

File: i didn't acrnm for this.jpg (109KB, 1469x817px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 1469x817px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvSs5b6y-YM

I wish Acronym actually made coats like Jensen's.

>>10929629
I wonder how much Acronym paid to be highlighted there.

Still not as badass as JC Denton tho. The remakes will always live in the shadows of the GOAT.

>>10923940
>so much this
I want reddit to leave

So this is kid of an odd question but do labels like ACRNM actually make a lot of money? The pieces are pretty damn expensive but the style nor the brand is very mainstream. It's all very boutique.

>>10909771
I like this.

>>10917177
mission workshop is ran by the guys that started chrome, so basically the godfathers of the modern messenger bag, their bags are probablly the best thing you can get as far as messengers go, but keep in mind that theyre made to be used on a bike where youre hunched down, so the weight is distributed better on your back, another benefit is that theres no straps compressing the areas around your armpits so you wont sweat as much as with a backpack. to summarize it, MW stuff is specialized gear ment to be used by bicicly couriers, whereas acr and bagjack variants seem to be aimed more at the fashion crowd.

disclaimer: i know that bagjack makes stuff for cycling but i havent seen a single messenger use their stuff, not even in germany

>>10929803
The original game was timeless indeed, but the sequel had legitimately amazing costumes. It was refreshing to see a cyberpunk game that didn't just throw trenchcoats on everyone and called it a day.

>>10929883

Like all high-end fashion brands, their costs to make the pieces pale in comparison to the prices they sell them for. Correct me anyone if I'm mistaken, but you see retailers slashing their prices by 50% margins and I'm sure they're still making a decent killing.

can you guys tell me some outerwear/brands that would go well with tubular/qasas? nothing oversized like parka. thanks.

>>10925333
wrong i can think of a few dudes posting techwear fits who are muscled and look great in this style

>>10929803
An employee approached Errolson to do it so I doubt they paid much, probably just another ACR disciple

Anyone owns Nike x Acronym Lunar Force? Was gonna cop, but confused about sizing. How's the shoe fit? I'm us 9 in asics and my feet is 26¾ cm

>>10931360
Somewhere for sale? Or grailed?

>>10931377
They're dead stock, m8
There are always few on eBay tho

>>10931360
Yeah, size down one size. I take US 12.5's, so I got the 11.5. Fits perfect. Apparently it's the same for all AF1's

File: irl.jpg (180KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 1080x1080px

>>10921822
Fight me irl faggot

>>10931391
I thought these are different shoes, just with similar silhouette. Thanks!

>>10931402
wow laserface has really gone overboard

>>10931360
They fit the same as a normal air force 1 or any other nike.

>>10931402
Oh.

File: 12547426_502028133309858_1982006049_n.jpg (127KB, 1080x1350px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 1080x1350px

>>10931402
>>10914089
This dude's page is a gold mine

>>10918467
no, its so ugly in real life, its like waxy and glossy

File: image.jpg (299KB, 1190x1184px) Image search: [Google]

299KB, 1190x1184px

>>10931466
U mad bro?

>>10931619
These 35 yo dudes swapped jackets for a fit photo? How cute

>>10931619
god techwear is stupid lol
whats wrong with jeans, a nice tee and a grail leather?

File: 24250732164_1f541dd867_z.jpg (62KB, 515x640px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 515x640px

Check this tryhard I found on instagram. He also reposted this autismcore outfit on Sufu lmao

File: image.jpg (221KB, 844x1172px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 844x1172px

>>10931619
Step up fuccbois

>>10930702
Apply yourself, faggot

>>10931648
Nothing wrong with that, you just happen to be in a /tech/ thread and thats not tech

>>10931729
nxtlvl

File: IMG_0795.png (1MB, 836x836px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 836x836px

>>10931729
>J U S T
#acrnm

>>10930753
care to share?

>>10931687
>this
>tryhard
That is fucking great how the fuck is this tryhard
Easily one of the better techfits I have seen, the shoes and the UC jacket makes this really interesting
Let's see your fits, you must not be tryhard at all

>>10931852
Stunt fits are mostly good and he own some grail-level pieces. However, he should ditch guerrilla groups meme-core items from his wardrobe, because this shit ruins everything.

>>10930529
Fashion brands more or less all make similar profits relatively speaking, Cheap ass brands have cheap as fuck manufacturing costs so they can sell cheap.
Of course if the brand is very popular they usually gradually up the retail costs to find the sweet spot where they are still moving the product with good rates and making the maximum amount of profit.
Acronym probably does make good money but it's all very relative, H&M makes so much fucking more because of the pure volume they move their stuff. Compared to other 'higher fashion' brands I think Acronym is actually on the lower end as it's kind of a niche, relatively new and doesn't have huge name recognition yet at least.

>>10931859
The cargos work wonderfully there.
Seems like another case of 'it's popular so I hate it' with guerrilla group. I think it's nice to see them getting more common, though seeing that grid tee paired with something by Cav Empt in lot of fits is getting kinda ridiculous.
And really there aren't that many higher end brands that do interesting clothing that fits the 'techwear' aesthetic, it's no wonder they are popular.

>>10931875
Maharashi is the only one that comes to mind that has an interesting concept/approach to tech/military inspired clothing

File: Unknown.jpg (184KB, 1080x1350px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 1080x1350px

>>10931875
>seeing that grid tee paired with something by Cav Empt in lot of fits is getting kinda ridiculous
Thats why i called it meme in the first place, same goes for tapered P10 style pants in every fit and most of them look like shit (picrelated). Basically he is ruining his fits using lots of cliches next to really good items.

>>10917177
I've been using my Monty religiously for about a year now anon.

I'm an avid cyclist so the bag is perfect in that aspect.

Furthermore its nigh indestructible and totally weather-proof.

Mine looks like new despite being slid across the road when I took a spill biking or even being puked on from a drunk buddy in a cab.

Everything else is just a less functional imitation.

>>10931889
Eh, not really 'ruining' fits but it does look bit uninspired by now because so many other fits floating around with the same idea. Nothing wrong with that really, it does look good but you don't really get points for originality for it anymore.

File: 54238455_p3.jpg (575KB, 800x1012px) Image search: [Google]

575KB, 800x1012px

Techwear threads are always bad.

>lol this instagram tryhard
>w2c dope shell for under $100

>>10932531
>Cyberpunk anime picture
>Techwear threads are always bad
Move on, faggot.

>>10932740
good post

bet you have tons of mountain hardwear and columbia, oh techwear god of 4chin

File: Screen Shot 2016-02-08 at 22.44.38.png (631KB, 922x989px) Image search: [Google]

631KB, 922x989px

>>10932761
Yes, i have lots of TNF too. I'm based techwear god of 4chin. Now post your wardrobe with timestamp, faggot.

File: IMG_20160208_155516.jpg (3MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4032x3024px

>>10932845
we about to fit battle, newb?

>>10932875
REKT

You fellas recommend any steel toe boots, if any exist for techwear? My current boots are going to be shit soon.

File: IMG_7864.jpg (1021KB, 2448x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1021KB, 2448x2448px

>>10932875
>that ugly ass laminat 3A-1 iteration
>we about to fit battle
You're the one and only techwear god of 4chin. I pass, because i'm scared.

>>10935205
2/10 no TNF no Columbia

Try harder faggot, this is 4chan not sufu

>>10935503
Lame comeback, poorboi

>>10935205
>>10935537
glad your friend let you borrow his shit for a pic

>>10935537
Damn u demolished me fom.

>>10935617
Yes, very nice of him.

well that was completely pointless

>>10935668
T b h 3/4 of this thread is just bickering

>>10935205
triple fucking rekt lmao

File: TripleWreck Logo.png (132KB, 535x536px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 535x536px

>>10935743
w2c gamercore burn

File: 兩實.png (829KB, 1000x500px) Image search: [Google]

829KB, 1000x500px

W2C neck gaiter like this one in black? I'm fucking tired of merino wool and just want some of that sweet synthetic meme.

File: Untitled-2.jpg (1MB, 1500x1500px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1500x1500px

>tfw need shirts to fill out wardrobe

>>10936983
All black? What jacket is that?
Also what kind of shirts? If merino, then obv. Icebreaker and Outlier if US, FunktionSchnitt if EU

>>10936983
>>10936983
whats your blog lmao

>>10937388

Arc'teryx LEAF Alpha LT

i have a few Icebreaker shirts and some poly-pro for the colder stuff, need to grab some Outlier here sooner than later. i just love jackets so much more.

>>10937612

none fām, thx 4 reminder ;_;

>>10923823
I just looked it up, they cost $ 225 here:

http://www.endclothing.com/us/adidas-consortium-eqt-2-3-athleisure-aq5262.html

Look pretty similar to y-3. I really like them.

Is it congruent to wear two contrasting brands in one fit?

I just think it might look weird if you have a big nike swoosh on your shoes and then an adidas logo on your pants.

Personally this is why I prefer things without logos.

File: 1381116037382.jpg (546KB, 800x536px) Image search: [Google]

546KB, 800x536px

>>10938052
anyone?

File: T4O0lmi.jpg (238KB, 681x1024px) Image search: [Google]

238KB, 681x1024px

>>10938280

File: huTzW.jpg (163KB, 500x667px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 500x667px

>>10938285

>>10938052
Well yeah, sure, but only if its super basic, well known shit like Nike v Adidas

If you had something from, say, Stone Island SP and another piece from Gyakusou, it would be fine. Would be tougher with a combo like Fjallraven and Arcteryx, but still doable. Major, major brands though? No chance.

Why would you even buy Adidas pants anyway?

File: 1381143425175.jpg (97KB, 750x489px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 750x489px

>>10938302
>Why would you even buy Adidas pants anyway?
That was just a random example. Here is a better one:

These Nike pants: http://shop.havenshop.ca/products/tech-fleece-pant-black-2

With some adidas shoes, these for example
>>10910242

File: image.jpg (764KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

764KB, 1024x683px

What exactly are good, simple techwear trousers/sweats? I've been thinking about getting a pair of the black kith mercer pants as pic related, while not very functional would they be simple enough to pull off a monochrome piece? That and plus want some good cold weather pants so if anyone can point me towards some that'd be greatly appreciated.

File: mexicogear.jpg (98KB, 720x1277px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 720x1277px

>>10932875
>>10935205

Acronym is like the 2D anime waifu of apparel. Looks great on the website, dudes wearing it in real life for the most part might as well be carrying around a Dakimakura and screaming 'I AM AN AUTIST WHO LIVES IN AN IDEALISED FANTASY WORLD' at the top of their lungs.

#ASPGRNM

File: tumblr_nngvmg0Xp91sfzxa1o1_1280.jpg (52KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 640x640px

>>10938649
lol basically

fuckin weeaboos always wearing $1k shells

>>10938649
>Solid Snack, the hero of Shadow Mousse

>>10936983
Anyone have any experience on that LEAF jacket? Thinking about copping as all around piece.

>>10939190
Mall-core

>>10938649
The only thing bad about acronym is the hype and the weeaboo/vidya loosers it attracts.

>>10939111
<3

>>10939193
Quality post

>>10939259
>The only thing bad about acronym is the hype and the weeaboo/vidya loosers it attracts.

Don't you mean techwear? 4chan? This thread?

>>10931402
I didn't know Gendo Ikari went on vacations

>>10917193
>2016
>Still thinks you can't wear socks with sandals
Kek

>>10938007

Yeah they drew a lot of inspiration from Y3's models. I forgot which one, but the model shape looks almost identical.

>>10935205
>size S
fit battles are the only battles you can ever win son

>>10938007
>>10939434
I don't think you can draw inspiration from something the same company, and most likely the same designers did.

I bet most of you here jack off to hentai or Ai Uehara you weeaboo fucks

>>10939593
Is this a meta post? Because 4chan is a fucking weeb site for anime anyway.

>>10917335
i'm pretty normie when it comes to fashion, but this looks beautiful, plus i backpack pretty regularly. do you guys think i could pull it off?

>>10929629
http://www.gameinformer.com/b/features/archive/2015/04/24/haute-future-how-fashion-designers-improved-adam-jensen-s-deus-ex-coat.aspx
>“[We] approached Adam Jensen as if he were a real person and built a coat that would meet his needs to real-world specifications,” Hugh says. “Rather than imagine his coat, we prototyped it and made it. It exists, and if you try it on you'll see that it fits and works beautifully.”

The end result of the collaboration is a jacket that looks interesting and plausible, while fulfilling one of the most basic criteria: A human person would wear it and not immediately feel embarrassed. “Even now, I think the crazier ones that we do are probably more wearable than some of the least crazy ones we did in Human Revolution,” Jacques-Belletete says. “I think we understand what our cyber renaissance is better than we did before, and we also understand fashion design better as well.”

>>10929803
>>10931178
They actually paid ACR for licensing. Errolson says in an interview.

>>10939190

i'm the poster of that, LEAF Alpha LT. it's got wide shoulders, meant to be layered underneath with insulating layers. it's GORETEX and is brilliant at blocking wind and rain, however it's not a very quiet jacket. some swishing as the material rubs against itself.

ran just over $600 for it, it's real low key.

>>10939455

I view Y3 as almost a separate entity from Adidas although historically they were borne under Adidas as their high-end fashion branch. I feel like Y3 comes up with all the innovative designs, only for them to be recycled through Originals and then into their sports goods too.

For example, iirc, the boost sole had been originally used by Y3's products and now have trickled into Adidas' mainline and into the mainstream.

That's why I claimed Adidas "drew inspiration" from their own designer branch.

>>10940902
>the boost sole had been originally used by Y3's products
The boost sole was from Adidas running line from the 90s. Don't weeb out so hard over Y-3.