Converse

File: 1446862201857.jpg (250KB, 960x1280px) Image search: [Google]

250KB, 960x1280px

>>10903652
ok

>>10903652
>they're making a "comeback"

Of course they're not making a comeback. For something to make a comeback it would have to go out of style first.

>>10903652
I always thought of them as "cartoon
Shoes" because all the cartoon characters would wear them. Probably because they're easy to draw.

I personally don't wear them but I don't hate them.

>>10903769
yeah I didn't get this either. It's like saying leather jackets or the Jaguar E series is making a "comeback".

>>10903652
PF Flyers are vastly superior anyway. From their style to the actual shoe, planely being better.
>PFs have a higher outer wall; now making 1in puddles nothing to fear
>The front cap of the shoe is thicker, making it way more durable
>That Posture Foundation insole that comes with every legit pair of PFs
The list goes on and on but honestly; Cucks are just a shit shoe

>>10903652
Your autism is on full blast

>>10903652
Its alright tho you probably wear stan smiths

>>10903807
>chucks are just a shit shoe
they are kind of bad, but they are also cheap af.

>>10903807
All these features will never save them from looking fucking awful though.
PF Flyers look like a bad child's drawing of Cons.

>>10903807
70s chucks better than both to be frank

Genuinely curious what do people like about this shoe?

>>10903966
I think it's an element of nostalgia, loved 'em as a kid. As a result I've got really flat feet which means they fit me well and once the canvas is broken in, they're pretty fucking comfy.