I have a bit of a different question for you today, /fa/. About

autism

>>10880431
yes
but what was the reason behind the boycott anon?

Tell us why you're boycotting them?

Also if you want to take business from them, you should probably buy a new pair of non-levi jeans, and tell everyone how great they are.

Good question OP but we need more information, ask your mother if she ever had you tested and let us know what she says.

>>10880431
>I'm still boycotting the brand
Except you're not. You're just saying you are.

>>10880437
>>10880445
It's really not relevant and I can see it leading to a lot of shitposting if I tell you.

>>10880454
Well I do use the product, I just haven't bought anything Levi's since then and I removed all the tags/advertisement from the jeans. T-That's OK, right?

>>10880476
cmon tell us why

>>10880476
Removing the patch, tab, and arcs from a pair of Levi's doesn't really make them less noticeable, but this is more of an ideological thing—you're saying you can have your cake and eat it too. That's not okay. If you want to boycott a brand, fucking boycott the brand. If you like the jeans more than whatever reason you've drummed up to boycott them over, then that reason isn't good enough for you.

>>10880476
just tell us, we're not going to shitpost.

you mentioned it anyways, so it's going to pique interest

>>10880431
you're a faggot, the whole idea of boycotting is so they lose sales you retarded autist

>>10880431
that's not okay whatsoever but you're boycott isnt gonna go anywhere tbqh

>>10880476
not at all anon, cmon tell us!

>>10880476
>It's really not relevant and I can see it leading to a lot of shitposting if I tell you.
Smells like you're part of that group that boycotted Levis for "supporting homosexuals"

>>10880486

That's actually a good point, anon. Very well, looks like I'll be binning them after all. I'll probably have to burn them or slice them up because I don't want anybody using them under any circumstances (i.e. any homeless tramps that fish them out of the garbage or whatever).

>>10880485
>>10880487

Fine.

It's because they ran an ad that features a black guy kissing a white girl, and I don't support that shit at all.

>>10880507
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

>>10880507
>It's because they ran an ad that features a black guy kissing a white girl, and I don't support that shit at all.

You're such a fucking faggot, holy shit

>>10880507
>taking it that seriously

>>10880507
>/pol/ getting cucked into trashing their favorite pair of jeans

File: foryou.png (207KB, 672x1189px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 672x1189px

>>10880507

>>10880431
Finally, another anon like me!
I've been on a boycott of Levi's jeans for going on six years now. One day, I was watching my favorite cleric speak on television, when a Levi's ad came on. In the ad, they featured young, American women wearing tight jeans, not covering their faces, showing their ankles, and - get this - even driving cars!

>>10880507
lel
It's honestly not possible to express that belief without people thinking you have a small cock

>>10880507
this whole thread has to be bait

if not, you are probably not a very well adjusted, functioning person

I'll give you an example: Vegans can still wear leather and fur-made clothes if they bought them before becoming vegan, if they buy it from thrift shops or get them as a gift, as they aren't actively contributing to fur and leather market.
This is the same. Don't throw them, but don't buy more. With brands the thing changes a lil' bit, because even if you get a pair via gift or whatever, you're marketing the brand, so i guess what you've done with their signature features is the correct answer.

>>10880608
Oh, it's totally bait. OP played a long-ish con. Decently done, points lost for no one getting that mad.

>>10880609
Uh...no they can't.

>>10880608

Not bait at all. I'm perfectly normal with a decent job and healthy social life, I just don't support interracial relationships of any kind (not just bm/wf) and don't want to give my money to companies that do.

Why is that so bad?

>>10880626
They can because they aren't contributing to the industry. It MAY be morally wrong if you're vegan because you love animals, but not if you're vegan for other reasons.

>>10880507
LOL

>>10880631
Are you a black man?

>>10880644

No.

>>10880507
Firstly, you're making /pol/ look really stupid if you're thinking of burning a pair of jeans you already bought. Also, if you were really boycotting them you would have burned them firstly instead of altering them. 3/10 bait, I honestly doubt that you visit /pol/ because you're too beta for them.

>>10880652
why dont you support interracial?

>>10880680
Because my gf cheated on me with a huge black guy and I cry myself to sleep every night

>>10880663
do you go on /pol/? you sound like you do.

>>10880548
>>10880552
>>10880558
Helllo reddit

>>10880507
fantastic bait

>>10880507
The setup, the execution, the result

/fa/ history right here

>>10880609
>if they buy it from thrift shops or get them as a gift
No not really.
Thrift shops still add to the problem, either by promoting leather or by contributing to the resale value.

As with gifts, don't accept them. Be nice about it, but if you have values its a virtue to stick by them, not make excuses.

>>10880507
>an ad that features a black guy kissing a white girl, and I don't support that shit at all.
AHAHAHAHA holy shit. What a fucking cunt.

>>10880507
hahahahahaHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

>>10880720
yeah

>>10880507
Good move op. I've boycotted a lot of brands because of the same thing.

It's not that I have anything against interracial dating, it's that I think it's gross for a company to bait people into buying their clothes using trendy liberal imagery in their marketing.

Let's not pretend that's not what these companies are doing. I don't see many ads with white guys kissing black girls, it's usually the opposite.

>>10880431
of course. just because you change the exterior of something which is ugly internally, the interior will not just go away.

>>10880507
Don't listen to the retard leftist cucks in this thread. You're doing god's work.

I can't stand race mixing.

>>10880487
>/fa/
>not shitpost
u wot m80?

Now thats what i call autism: Volume 3

>>10880431
its not a good question, its a pretty stupid one. whether or not you take off the labels and alter them so that they are unrecognizable, is irrelevant. The bottom line is that you are buying levis, and you are giving them money. so you are essentially not boycotting them at all.

>When /pol/ meets /fa/

Dude it's your money. You can buy whatever you want.

>>10880431

Do you understand what a boycott is you fucking idiot? If you're giving them money its not a boycott, you're just pretending like you aren't wearing Levis when in reality you're too much of a pussy to stick by your beliefs and not support a company that you dont even like.

>>10880431
hypocrite

>>10880507
you are very autistic
t. /pol/

File: btp.jpg (65KB, 546x700px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 546x700px

>>10880507
>>10881349
>>10881410

>all these faggots falling for le epic bait

screencapped and uploaded to r/4chan

>>10880634
Or if you're a massive fucking hypocrite

>>10880507
you're doing the right thing, op.

A boycott is an organized action by a group to refuse to do business with a company for political reasons. You are not boycotting Levi's, you are just one single person who doesn't want to buy things from a company and they are not at all hurt by your actions or even aware of your motivation for it.

File: if I fall.png (49KB, 415x215px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 415x215px

>>10880507
lmao

do levi's shrink at all in the dryer?

>>10882265
>being brainwashed by leftist media

File: 1453378894989.jpg (13KB, 363x364px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 363x364px

>>10880507

WEAK BAIT

>>10884775
I have a pair where the waist has loosened up, don't know if it's from the dryer or the washing machine.

>>10880507
>not because Levi Strauss is a Jew

Come on

File: d659d46cdd411fb12a24daca48f724fa.jpg (50KB, 500x516px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 500x516px

high quality thread

>>10885450
very

File: image.jpg (20KB, 460x201px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 460x201px

>>10880507
GODS WORK ANON

Must really suck for you though because tons of brands do that

>>10880431
>>10880507
I swear to God, I saw this same post around a year ago. I knew that it was going to be about boycotting due to race mixing as soon as I read Levi's.

File: 1417979532028.png (154KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 640x480px

Why would you have a problem with race mixing, OP? Perhaps you are projecting your own sexual inadequacies onto an Other, with a black man being the first vessel available.

There is nothing wrong with race-mixing. It has nothing to do with liberal or conservative.

You are a backwards motherfucker if you think race-mixing is a problem. If you don't like it, go fuck off to Nazi Germany you eugenicist fascists.

I don't buy Levi's because they're anti-gun as fuck and I won't support that, even if they're only losing a hundred bucks a year from me.

OP is still a faggot coming from a hardline libertarian.

>>10880507
>black male white girl
> I dont like it

Damn str8 m8

>>10882265
Wow nice shill, arent you such a social justice warrior.

File: [babby intensifies].jpg (4KB, 184x153px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 184x153px

>>10880507

>>10884775
nope, they stretch over time

>>10880507
I actually think that's a great reason, I would do the same

>>10886158
fuck off back to tumblr you cuck

>>10880507

legit question senpai - would you feel differently about the ad if it was a white guy kissing a black girl?

>>10880431
20/10 quality bait, the likes of which had never seen /fa/ before.
I'm impressed, OP.
dibs bedora :DD

>>10880507
LMAO AR U SRS SON

>>10880431
youre a salty piece of shit whos just mad girls dont like racists damn son.

>>10880431
this thread is even more cringe worthy when you realize op is black