Sticky ricky

Where am I to revise the basics of fashion now?

If there is no bible for us, will stupid questions run rampant?

the sticky is basically mfa 2 years ago, no point referring to it anymore

>>10876187
Perhaps it's time for a refresher? The wiki has been neglected tbf and I imagine even though it won't do a whole lot a good solid collection of info there could be a decent way to slim down on some of the poor quality threads.

>>10876354
The last time it worked, none of the pictures loaded

>>10876354

I think it is time.

How do we go about this, mods?

>>10876059
I've been tempted to start one that wasn't a wiki per se, more like an image/info repository. Not gonna do it if Tuxbell comes back, though.

>>10877592
If you just started a thread like once a week after having made some and began to alter them with suggestions, I'm sure you could, in time, come to create a fantastic set of information.
I'd even go ahead with it even if tuxbell does come back. It can't hurt designing some new/extra material to compliment or fix what tuxbell currently has.

>>10877592
We need a fresh new update anyway. Can't think of no one else better than you to do it.

>>10877683

wow

File: vanitatis.jpg (206KB, 1600x1068px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 1600x1068px

what happened to the archive

>>10877603
>>10877647
I'm stuck in my condo because of D.C. Snowpocalyse 2016 (well, more like I refuse to take my beautiful-ass car out in the nasty-ass snow), so I'll begin drafting some stuff up.

Here's my current thinking on how it'll be set up:
- Two parts of the site - guides and just an image dump that's tagged properly

- Guides are VERY terse, basically so they are skim-friendly, and hard-coded
-- Probably focusing on common topics, like suiting, jeans, sneakers, etc.
-- No store recommendations, the Tuxbell wiki got bogged down with that given the scope
-- Maybe a page on common /fa/ traps - YesStyle, getting insecure about height, etc.
-- Ideally slow-moving - edits every month at most

- Image area might be something I need help with - basically infographics and common inspo
-- Maybe some sort of way people can send me proposed uploads/tags, like Gelbooru's script or something

Thoughts?

>>10877915
Youre the man pat

>>10877915
If you're going to get rid of the store recommendations, consider listing sites that have reliable reviews of store/brand quality. It's kinda frustrating having to rely on mfa/reddit or reviews of random internet sites to help figure out if a store sells quality merchandise. Additionally, maybe include a guide to determining the quality of a given piece, in person, by the stitching/material/etc.

Alright, drafting.

Any thoughts on a domain name?

>>10878352
Good point. What if I put the recommendations section on a separate page and just started a thread to populate it? I'm far from the best person to opine on insertrandombrandfrombumfucksweedenhere

>>10878453
Have you looked at the archive for previous sticky suggestions?


>Any thoughts on a domain name?
hanky code

revive