what do all of these have in common? they all tried to replicate stan smiths. Yet you cancerous faggots say that they're shit and not worth buying
samefag detected, if you knew anything of sneaker history it's kind of obvious that OP has a point, these brands did try to replicate the silhouette of the Stan Smiths. Btw I've had mine for 2 years theyre still rocking fine and look great, please try harder next time i'm sorry you're probably a dipshit who stomped around in yours dragging your pleb feet everywhere and ruined them quick
Common projects are actually inspire by Rod Lavers, not stans.
SLP sneakers are overpriced AF.
Also Stans/Lavers are built like shit. Crappy leather and construction. CPs will outlast them for years. CPs also have a high resale value, which cheap adidas trainers do not.