New diaper thread.
You can try as hard as you like to hold it in, but eventually, it'll happen. An accurate description of our crappy community.
What onomatopoeia would you choose?
What's up with the AB/DL games? I was looking at some from a thread earlier in the week, and basically two of the major ones have overt (almost as if it's trying to sell you the idea) religious themes. One of them (proxi rapture) was at once exploring a fetish and blatantly promoting mormon ideals and beliefs. Momsterous seemed really good, but it's incomplete and shows no sign of even a single chapter being finished. I'm playing LAFWIRM right now and it's very uh... it's good but once again really churchy. People keep suggesting you go to church. What gives?
Because all the game devs subconsciously believe that fetish is impure and they need to save their souls and their players' souls
Also notice how basically none of them have actual adult content.
Proxi Rapture is by SSJ5Cloudphiroth or whatever his name is. He's very religious and kind of rubs me the wrong way beside that.
LAFWIRM has a lot of religious parody. It's basically the opposite thing.
There's quite a lot of games which don't have religious themes.
The only one I have seen that's even a little bit lewd is pedo as hell. 8 and 9 year olds lifting up their skirts. Which is funny, because it's proxi rapture, the one made by the crazy mormon guy. The opening is like an introduction to mormonism... and then it's this pedo shit.
I don't understand it either, I think it's probably because the level of batshit is considerably higher in our community than in most of them.
I can see the parody. Their church is vaguely rastafarian or something. It involves weed. It's just really weird that religion is so strongly featured. Also SSJ5Cloufiroth is the most deviantart username ever created.
The artist was experimenting with perspective in this pic.
I don't think most people care about reaching the largest audience possible. The majority of people drawing fetish art are doing it because they like fetish art foremost and want to make other fetishists happy as a secondary. If you're just going after the largest audience possible, they wouldn't draw diaper art.
Though this with regards to vore rather than diapers, I've noticed the few pony stories I've done have gotten over twice as many views/favorites than any of my non-pony content.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding you, but I think the reason is partially because of how big of a fanbase bronies are in general.
Right, so by doing pony drawings, they're appealing to a pretty large audience already. So it's not really restricting, but doing what they know a large group of people will recognize and like.
Also, requesting more diapers underneath dresses, if anyone has more along those lines.
It's a shitty picture, but argh god why do I like this so much
Hey, my trip's gone. Where'd that go?
Believe me, I'd be dumping the poniest of pony stuff right now if I could.
They ever do diaper threads over on /mlp/?
There are threads, but it is extremely hit or miss if the janitors decide to delete them. There can be long droughts between threads, so once one does pop up, it might die because no one even checks for it.
There are a few writefags and at least a couple drawfags, not to mention a guy making a platformer game (though it has too much messing for my taste).
I am not sure how active it is, but you might have better luck with their IRC, which is #crinkleponies on Rizon iirc.
It's worth noting that the threads cover AR as well, if you like that too, but it's even more niche than diapers.
It almost seems like one game is specifically mocking the other. I can't say for sure though, since baboon appears to support proxi rapture. As for me I like both games anyway, because diapers.
Has anyone else plugged LAFWIRM into rpg maker and seen some of the content you can't actually access in the game? There's some pretty cool stuff, and I discovered a few tidbits that are in the game, but I had never discovered in multiple playthoughs, hint, when Jodie is about to have an accident go to the bar and talk to either the old guy at the table, or the woman behind the bar, with the woman, you can go back multiple times and it does different things.
Alright, here's Mami and Kyoko from the last thread. Sorry this took so long, I didn't have as much time as I would have liked to work on it.
And also from last thread, I didn't expect to get so many requests, so I might have to do another or two.
We really do need a dedicated fetish board for live models (not chinese cartoons)
/soc/ has diaper threads but doesn't allow porn dumps, and its impossible to keep them going on /b/ now that the catalog is only 10 pages
and diaperchan is just dead
Well maybe if people started posting content, it wouldn't be
Looks like the thread got got already. That was quick.
Because people with fetishes are sometimes aroused by unorthodox sexings.
> Care to post examples?
First of all, since it probably comes naturally, try not to post like a self assured cunt and use a bit of common sense besides hiding behind some English teacher mentality of "if he can't post examples, he must be wrong!"
So, examples? Nothing specific, but here goes
This is a community that will sperg out hard at even the slightest whiff of "child porn". This ranges from the idiocy surrounding deeker to just the general dislike of lolicon/shotacon artwork among the members. It has nothing to do with a well reasoned moral stance. It's knee jerk circle jerking with no basis other than the mentality that the best way to prove you're not a pedophile is to scream "I'M NOT A PEDOPHILE" as loudly as you can when in a children's playground.
Then of course you have another knee jerk mentality concerning other fetishes and kinks. I once went onto the adisc IRC (before I realized what a cess pit it is) where people were freely and openly talking about wearing and pooping in diapers. I said something along the lines of "yeah, sometimes I like to tie myself up while I do that too" and oh my god, you'd think I'd announced I was a child rapist. Supposedly people tying themselves up is a HUGE taboo. Again, ass burgers, big time. Because why? Because the ab/dl community fancies themselves victims and snowflakes in their own right. They did not CHOOSE to be fetishists, it's no different than being gay or a furry, r-right? But other fetishes, that's icky.
You don't go on tumblr, apparently. Almost every ABDL/Ageplay girl I follow is into things like anal, hard sex, enemas, bondage, spanking, S&M, and all manner of the more mainstream fetishes.
I don't know where you're getting your sample data, but that place is pretty damned skewed.
Also, since no one made a suggestion, I'm going to post JamJarMonster for now. I enjoy her art quite a bit.
And that's not even mentioning the hundreds of reblogs they give to the LBGT, social justice, and socio-liberal posts plastering their tumblrs.
I think you're conflating the last generation's ABDLs (people who are between 28ish to 40 today), with the majority of the fetish. Almost every single younger member of the community seems to be a very loud and outspoken liberal. Not that I have a problem with that.
Went and posted some pretty pampered porny ponies over on diaperchan.
I don't actually watch the show, I just like the porn.
Humanized ponies are cute, but I just can't get behind the diapered ponies themselves. That said, I'm subjected to MLP through my little, but I'll do almost anything for her. Wish I could have drawn the line at ponies but she's taken to messing her diapers for me once in a while, so I'm not going to complain. If ponies for her continues to fulfill my fetishes, she can force me to watch them.
Pic related, like I said, they're kinda cute when it's not borderline bestiality/furry.
It's not even about you liking the show here. I mean at least ponyfags have an understandable reason towards liking ponyporn, they like the show and characters. You don't have that reason so even if both comes off as gross, you don't get any empathy to mitigate that.
>I'll not watch a children's show but I'll masturbate to it's characters
Can you at least understand why it seems gross?
Oh hey pieceofsoap isn't dead.
I used to have to pee 9-10 times a day until I realized it wasn't normal. Started wearing and didn't look back. These diaper threads always make me feel better about a somewhat medical condition. So thank you all!
Yep! Had an ultrasound done. I just have a very small bladder, otherwise there's nothing wrong with me. I could get away with not wearing if I wanted, but it's just easier this way and I actually make less trips to the bathroom.
Hi /d/iapers. I'm looking for a specific picture of Tomoko wearing a diaper, a ball gag, and a collar with a leash, so if someone could post it, that would be amazing.
Good for you. If you can wear, have fun, and it helps you from day to day then all the more power to you. Sounds like it's way more convienent then having to run to the bathroom all the time.
Was it this one? I'm unfamiliar with actual character names.
Tomoko has black hair and bags under her eyes. Also, her hands are not bound in the picture I am looking for. Thanks anyway!
Hey /d/, will you mind reading this comic with me?
Taking a chance and posting a diaper boy. Here's hoping this doesn't start another shitstorm. They don't make diapers big enough.
I know which one you're talking about, I could only find this version.
I know it, too, but I do not have it.
Oh well, more jammy. And as before, if you'd like me to post another artist or have a request, don't be shy!
I'm gonna keep posting. It really seems like a steady stream of content has kept these threads from devolving into shitstorms.
And I'm more than a bit happy about the distinct lack of nonsense, all things considered.
But good things only last so long on /d/. Not trying to jinx it, but we all know "they" lurk among us. I'm gonna give it until halfway into the next thread before the drama returns briefly.
Oops, forgot an image. Stupid, stupid.
You could not have chosen a worse word.
The picture that was made on is from a PSD file with interchangeable variations on her hair (greasy hormones, short, or normal) The gag, where her eyes are looking, and a few other options.
Honestly, When I originally made the leash and gag I was trying to bait someone into programing Tomoko into Slavemaker3.
There is actually a rather large Christian support group for ABDL's on fetlife. Not even kidding.
Why is this surprising? I'd find it surprising if it were a Muslim support group.
Western morality, which is largely informed by Christianity, shouldn't have much of a specific issue with fetishes in general because many aspects of sexuality are sinful, as they arose from the original sin.
Sex and our desire for it, in all the kinks and fetishes that exist, are part of our scientifically defined evolutionary imperative, the sum total of humanity's greatest majority must therefore be incapable of ceasing to sin. Many biblical sources and criticisms say it is completely impossible for the sinner to stop sinning, for they love the sin more than their god.
However, Christianity's loophole so that everyone doesn't get condemned to the hell which doesn't even exist in the Judaic texts is Yeshua, the son of god. Even if you cannot stop yourself from sinning, it is accepted by their lord for he loves the sinner more than they love the sin.
(continued to in next post)
The reason any Christian would fear hell or that their acts of sin are condemning them to it would be an existential lack of faith. They are fearful there are some sins, or some lines of sinning that Jesus would hate moreso than any other. Why they'd believe wearing a diaper and pretending to be a baby would rank higher than serial murder, rape, or general refusal to live up to their socialistic hippy savior is entirely beyond me.
There is, however, no Jesus clause, and no such safety net like that in Islam. You cannot be in full submission to the will of Allah if you cannot cease sinning. That is why they consider so much of the Christian texts apocryphal, because if they were a part of the overall Islamic religious dialogue, the point could be made that A)No one can cease sinning and B)Sinners cannot fully submit to the will of Allah. This leads to the inevitable C)No man or woman aside from the prophet himself can reside in the paradise created for those in full submission to the will of Allah.
Methinks religion was never meant to be studied with such epistemological and alethiological lenses, because it swiftly becomes redundant, recursive, or nonsensical. I also understand that deists (not Christians), atheists, and agnostics formed the philosophical roots of epistemology and alethiology. So that could be the singular reason it is impossible to look at religions semantically and logically. They are inherently apart from those view points by nominating belief as the singular most important Truth Bearer.
There's my thesis on why a Christian ABDL support group isn't surprising, but a Muslim one would be astonishing.
Yes I am fully aware of what you are saying and I do realize that Christianity does not condemn fetishes so long as they are practiced out of love of the husband/wife as a part of preferably reproductive sex and not solely based in lust.
That being said:
1. Fetlife has lots of porn (lust not love)
2. Diaper fetishism itself almost never involves reproductive sex as part of the theme, unlike more mainstream stuff.
Also, while in my experience devout Christians seem slightly happier or the same as agnostics, Muslims are basically always miserable. Muslims religion boils down to a condemnation of joy.
We were just talking. Nobody's fighting here.
That was me. I posted that. I wasn't being combative either, merely analytical. Just because I've been quiet thus far doesn't mean much. I'd say the appearance of a trip is a worse jinx.
Yeah, but the Christian founder Yeshua, from how his eminence and beneficence is described, alongside his teachings, never condemned sex itself, or even lust, really. In fact, his whole damned belief was based on love. To love him and be loved by him would absolve someone of ANY sin. Because sinners are depicted as weak and incapable of ceasing their sin, even from birth. The whole point of christening a child is so that they can go to heaven if they die before they are old enough to begin sinning rationally. Those are predominantly Catholic teachings.
I don't disagree with you at all, and certainly not here.
Do you really think I'm condemning the followers of Islam? I only said their religion doesn't have the same safety net in Yeshua that is present in Christianity, and thus I'd be more surprised that any practicing muslim of devout faith would broadcast their fetish. There is nothing wrong with Muslims, or Hindus, or Christians, or Jews. There are inherent things wrong in their faiths, but that's not who they are beyond a belief they ascribe to. You can criticize a faith without criticizing the adherents. I just did it.
I didn't say they were terrible people just that their religion is too restrictive and makes them unhappy. I know dozens including a several friends. Very few kept their religion after moving out of home, compared to the majority of Christians I know remaining devout.
I am mostly going of New Testament Catholicism so you are probably right.
Yep. There's your problem.
But, my joking aside, the majority of belief probably falls somewhere in the middle of Protestant belief and Catholic belief in our swiftly secularizing world. Protestantism, with the sole exception of American Protestantism, was the first schism of thought that began to secularize and preach total forgiveness of the flaws within man. Catholicism today is looking to be the next shifter of belief with popes like JPJ and Francis being so incredibly liberal-minded on topics long since considered "absolute" within the Church.
patch notes: 1.02
-Slight texture cleaning
-Heart design added
-Slight shading tweaking
Yeah that's the vibe I've been feeling too. I'm not sure total secularization is necessarily a good thing though. People need some sort of relatively static values and way too many people nowadays have none. My experience with people who have rapidly changing or very vague values is that they just write off anything they do wrong as somehow not really mattering. Of course, extensively thinking about where you stand without religion works too, but even that seems to be disappearing.
On the subject of relatively static values, I don't think that having a set code necessarily makes more moral people. Usually it's the attribute of caring about doing the right thing that has people care about morality, and that's independent of religion.
compared to the sketch or the one with strongman arms?
Secularization doesn't mean morality and faith in something (namely a humanistic belief that mankind can be good) just disappear.
>My experience with people who have rapidly changing or very vague values is that they just write off anything they do wrong as somehow not really mattering.
What you're describing here is most assuredly nihilism or hedonism, and in the scope of society today, I agree that many people are drunk on a cup of both. However, that's no better or worse than zealotry and fanaticism of any sort, religious, nationalist or otherwise.
Humanism is that anthropogenic system of morality that has been proven to work since it was conceived by Grecian and Roman philosophers like Epicurus, to name one. It is the core basis of all human morality, transcending and encompassing them, and even mirrors some tenets of Abrahamic faiths, Eastern faiths, and South American faiths.
The fact that it is, without a doubt, one of the oldest philosophies from which little need be detracted, and to which little need be added, proves it is a solid system of viewing that mankind is as flawed as they will themselves to be, and belief in the capability of mankind's essential goodness is the first step in conquering our flaws.
Hahaha, oh wow. I just noticed that. That's hilarious.
I've only said what I said because I do notice that Christians will believe and project the notion that morality is impossible without a set common morality being upheld by their peers, community and god. Christian apologetics will even go as far as to ask people where good things come from to prove their point (mainly to counter the argument of where evil comes from if god is good).
Funny enough, I was making an AB/DL game in RPG maker, centered around talking to and appeasing a pantheon. Considering how off-kilter I made them, I didn't think it was preachy, but that's a great idea, and I'm going to use it.
Forgive me for this, for I regret everything.
10 minutes in Photoshop.
Well, I completely missed the chance to infer that! Still, those apologetics are hinging their question on the idea that "something has to come from somewhere/thing" which is logistically sound until you start looking into things like the genesis of the universe and abiogenesis of life.
I'm entirely with you on the idea that they'll never ask the converse question because of the implication that if god creates the devil and the devil creates evil (which is never explicitly or implicitly stated in the bible at all) then god created the genesis of evil.
>god created the genesis of evil.
The cognitive dissonance gets pretty terrible until you come to a point where you have to demean the ability of human perception in order to justify this.
Well, no matter how you try to slice it, the omniscient and omnipotent god created a creature that would, with complete disclosure, create a vast evil. To abide that is most assuredly an evil deed. So, perhaps it's more fair to say that by creating the creature to commit the first evil, while possessing total comprehension of the effects of that causal action, the appraisals that can be made are: that god is not omniscient; that god is indifferent by nature and works in a manner akin to someone with a sociopathic bi-polar disorder; that god is everything he creates and thus both good and evil; that the devil was not evil until he was created (which is an incredibly circular thought); or that god doesn't exist and neither does objective evil.
Since I foresee the topic of objective evil becoming heated, let me offer any posters who want to argue its existence a simple exercise: go to /b/ and see if you can get everyone to agree on a single objective evil. If you sit back in your chair and say, "That can't be done, they'll never agree, even if just to be contrary to the group," you've just proven that a universal consensus can never be made on evil.
Not to mention that we're going to have to define what we mean by evil.
Of course that's with the christian definition of evil of being not of god, which is real weird since everything was made by god.
But outside of that evil isn't a concept that exists in pure form as any evil is done for some value unless acted upon by someone who is mentally unstable.
And boy does the argument change between the two definitions.
Omniscient can refer to time as well as location.
Seeing every event from every location throughout the past and future, all in one moment...
The same way that, if you're reminded of a story you know by heart, a flood of memories about that story go through your head at once.
The only problem with this kind of omniscience is that you can't actively interact with the universe even with Omnipotence. You have to rerender the universe from scratch with every change you make.
That's where you're failing to grasp omnipotence. An omnipotent being is beyond physical constraints, beyond conception, and beyond quantification. The Christian god could, in theory, scrap and rebuild the universe an infinite number of times in the time of a single planck, the smallest unit of time measurement. He can literally break the rules because he is the arbitrator of those rules and they obey his whim. I know, I don't need to tell you, but omnipotence literally means "all-powerful." Omnipotence is really the most damning aspect of Christianity. If god is omnipotent, he must get what he wants at all times. He obviously doesn't want all of his creations to be saved and live in heaven if it isn't fact. It's part of the Epicurean theory that God can only be evil, impotent, or non-existent, and any other explanation says nothing of evil or why it exists. That guy was writing things like that over 250 years before Christianity, though nowhere near as long before the beginning of Messiah Myths.
There is literally nothing YHWH cannot do, except create a rock he cannot lift, if you're wanting to get into paradoxes.
For objective evil to exist within the Christian dogma, there must be an outside arbiter (Yahweh) with complete control- omnipotence- for the definition to be absolute.
If any arbiter of an objective truth has no means of providing an absolute proof without caveat for their truth, it is not objective. Even if an arbiter could get to within 99.999999999% certainty of proof (but not an infinitely repeating .9 because that is essentially 100%), that billionth of a percentage is enough to render the arbitration impotent, because there are cases where the proof is uncertain. Even some scientific facts lack objectivity. The sky is only blue to creatures that can actually see that color, for instance.
If there is no omnipotence, the claim of an objective evil (or objective anything) is rendered fallible, if not immediately impotent.
You don't mean this one of rule 63 Dipper and Wendy, do you? This is the only Gravity Falls pic I recall seeing last thread, then again I was too busy fapping.
This float your boat and put a rise in your diaper?
Does desperation relief do it for you, too?
Or the end result of desperate attempts to hold it?
I just wish my desperation pics weren't limited mostly to pure omorashi without diapers.
How about messy desperation?
Another messy accident, the face could be construed as desperate, sorta.
Last one for you.
Put omnipotence in the perspective of relativity.
If a person is Omnipotent and Omniscient compared to the universe, then from their perspective, that Universe is an intangible thought.
It's not about being able to break the rules: There is no physical way to follow the rules at all. No matter how heavy a rock he creates, it's only heavy from our perspective. From his it's still just intangible. The only way to interact with that rock is to create something to interact with it.
And you're right, he must get what he want's at all time, but everything in the universe is a part of him, and everything wants conflicted things.
I don't even know what we're talking about.
1. How many of you mix ab/dl with actual sex or sensual acts? I prefer to, but most pictures or media tend to not show any actual sexual content. Is it unrelated to actual sex as far as many are concerned? I'm curious to learn what people other than myself enjoy about this.
2. A mad mad mad world is back for a final installment!
Yeah. It's still being discussed and there's a 98% chance of it happening. It's an offer that has been available to me for a while, so it's not like I went out and found a dom to be a live in for last second out of desperation. I don't know how frequently diapers will be implemented, but he did explicitly say "diaper slave girl" this time whereas before I think he's said it will mostly be at night. I know he can be trusted because I've spoken with one of his former subs and at the beginning of the conversation yesterday he asked me if I was sure it was something I wanted and if I would be happy doing it, which made me feel a lot better.
But the point is that you're not approaching the topic from the view of YHWH's omnipotence and omniscience. They go into a fair bit of detail.
>He can be anywhere and everywhere at once: omnipresence
>He knows all and sees all: omniscience
>He can do anything he pleases without any sort of limitation: omnipotence
You can't qualify the three omni's in relation to the YHWH. They are, literally, beyond qualification and quantum. There are no "units" of all-power/knowing/presence. He simply is the mary-sue of the universe and can do anything he wants without prohibitives.
Funny enough if you do think of omnipotence and omniscience in a relative view, it's all the same. Only the details are different through semantics.
You did mention this but I don't think your assumption that the intangibility of an omnipotent and omniscient being is valid. If he can do any action within the universe, such as create, then that's a method to interact with that environment, so you can't say that the being is completely intangible towards the universe.
> and diaperchan is just dead
I hate that line of thinking. Diperchan has potential, if more people would upload more content and create more discussion.
Then if we take the biblle's account that God strongly disproves of sin, then logically that means that something happens that god didn't want which challenges his omnipotence and omniscience.
Can someone give me the source to this picture? Also, can someone translate it or find a translation of it? I'm like... obsessing over here. If one of you guys translates it, I'll try to edit the pic and post it here again with the translation.
awhile back someone made a rough translation. The one in the last frame is supposed to be protecting the other from the "mommy" characters perverted influence or something, and is depressed that she couldn't manage it.
I just find that last frame hilarious. The way the back is drawn to deliberately look like an adult wearing a diaper, instead of cutesying it. It's the binge/purge cycle perfectly illustrated. If /d/ were like /vg/ I'd make a DIAPERS GENERAL banner out of it, captioned something like "5 minutes later"
Why is that every diaper blog on Tumblr are always "littles", babyfurs, chastity/catheter users, and human waste fetishists? Can't there just be regular diaper fetish blogs?
Though most blogs of that fetish that would be considered regular have mental/age regression stuff but I'm not into it.
>she couldn't manage it
Just as a heads up, those characters are from Inazuma Eleven. The ones pictured are all male.
There's no reason why I say this other than to correct. Carry on.
For some reason my posts about religion didn't get deleted but the other more intelligent anon did. What gives?
Have you guys ever met any really autistic publicly shameless ABDL's in real life (by accident)? I saw this dude the other day I had seen on Fetlife. He was a middle aged unshaven Asian man wearing a stained oversized Sonic T-shirt and Bermuda shorts. He spoke in baby talk to a really scared-looking cashier.
No. Quite the opposite for me. My only encounter was with my closest friend who also shares the same fetish. I buy diapers for him for Christmas.
No other sightings other than that.
I have one close friend who has said (albeit way back five years ago) that he is curious about what diapers feel like. Not sure if that is quite fetish tier. I had one other friend who I'm pretty sure was an DL because he was caught at age 12 stealing pullups from my other friend's dayhome. I think being an ABDL is more common than we than it's purported to be.
>he is curious about what diapers feel like
Sometimes, that's all it takes to start.
>I think being an ABDL is more common than we than it's purported to be.
I think so also, though you won't hear a big time CEO man or woman admit to it. It's probably the individuals with not much to lose that express it more like the one you mentioned before.
I also know people that tend to say ABDL related "keywords" and phrases in a way to see if anyone may pick up on it, otherwise play it off as a joke. I caught on with my friend I mentioned last post, but I was the one that admitted it first after being nagged to (conversation was about fetishes).
Friend of poster here.
Compare the ip range if you don't believe me, janitors.
They got a three day post ban for the human fluttershy image. They asked me over Skype to post for them because they don't want to have to ban evade. They left me with one message.
"I find it odd that the janitor deleted all of non-offending posts as well. Talk about asspained little shit on a power trip ."
>They got a three day post ban for the human fluttershy image
That's bannable now? I'm not /MLP/, but I've seen humanized characters from the show posted here without issue for months. Probably years even.
Funny, right. and yet a board rule, of /d/ is "no western drawn or style art" but that Shit never gets enforced.
this has been my experience, everyone was pretty young if a little socially awkward but we kinda just chatted about how awesome getting your diaper changed felt
Probably shouldn't be a rule anymore, if anything. There are several drawfag generals all over 4chan boards which may mainly contain western users and their art. Those have never been targeted. I don't know if the offense was "posting mlp outside mlp" but I think banning for humanized characters is stretching it, especially for /d/.
I don't like separating art based on region, but that's just me.
It depends on the mod/janitor. Some aren't familiar enough with the show to recognize a humanization, some will let it slide (since it could conceivably just be a girl in a MLP-inspired outfit) and I guess at least one will ban for it.
I can name several:
Angelica Pickles. Like >>5646176
said about Veruca. Especially as a teen. Not only convent but a deep seated fetish, probably as she got older she got less and less attention and wants that close relationship with a parent figure
Lisa Simpson - properly feels that women's underwear has become to over sexualized and liberating for women who are confided to a sexy eye candy stereotype.
Velma Dinkley - She wears them mostly out of necessity. Cramped in the middle seat of a 3 passenger van and has 5 people inside. Maybe health reason like a weak bladder control so she easily wets herself when startled.
That and she has a dad that will cut mountains in half to please her
>Lisa Simpson - properly feels that women's underwear has become to over sexualized and liberating for women who are confided to a sexy eye candy stereotype.
I can see this plot heppening.
Fuck, I want somebody to write it.
Im surprised no one has done brandon stark and jojen reed being babied by meera, with bran being a cripple and how she always is taking care of jojen it seems likely that there would be someone who would want to see some diaper play come of that
I don't see why autism has to be brought into question. The autistic spectrum has a really wide range and includes higher functioning things such as aspergers where the only "ailment" is social skills but are incredibly intelligent (most being smart enough to realize their social skills kinda suck and overcome it)
Suddenly desiring more diapered Pokegirls, and then this. Anymore, guys?
I've always been tempted to do that, but I'm not sure how that would work out.
Why is the pokemon in a diaper too?
I was just about to post that.
My guess is the commissioner wanted that.
I have several autistic family members, most of which have matured with age and even raised families. The problem is that a lot of autistic people use it as an excuse to make no effort to listen to other people's concerns and are often selfish. Especially by middle age when people tell them directly that what they are doing is making them uncomfortable they should know to stop. Autism is a condition with benefits and downfalls, not some excuse for being selfish.
You mean rouge the bat? Unfortunately for you, Rouge is considered furry and cannot be posted here.
as someone who was heavily autistic as a kid, I really don't get what would make someone similar to me do such a thing. Also why is it that it seems super common that autistic's are abdl people cause i am super curious cause i don't know why i am into this.
I want to help, I want to contribute, but I feel a tad bit alone out there.
You're not the only one. I've made a couple of threads there but I don't know if i should just make threads by artist or by topic. I'm also currently doing a cyoa there but it needs more participants. the other cyoa writers left i think or they're just busy.
Pretty much what happens with somebody who has Aspergers is they are really intelligent, but social skills kinda suck unless they consciously work towards it (it may be on the autistic spectrum, but they're not fucking retarded) and how they feel things is a bit different from "normal" people. I think there are people out there that all like "Oh yeah I totally have that" because they read it on the internet but didn't actually receive a legitimate diagnosis
Aspbergers prevents people from reading social cues. They can understand perfectly well what people mean when told directly. Social cues do take some conscious effort to learn for them though.
>asspained little shit on a trip
The irony. Hopefully we'll have decent diaper threads for a while now that he's not here to spam disgustingly bad western art of muscular ogres and hyper messing.
I should really post what I have thus far of what I have written in terms of stories and art. I have posted a little, but not all.
He's got a lot of decent stuff, too. And honestly, I'm going to bet the threads are going to be dead.
The stepmother route of Hitomi My Stepsister ends with the titular stepsister mentally regressing into a baby, with mentions of her wetting her diaper and getting changed.
One Week with Elder Sister is mainly an omorashi game, but you can wear diapers in it too. The main attraction, however, would be a certain ending where one ends up making the big sister have a dream about being placed in a kindergarten, then wakes up mentally regressed.
In Eroge ~Sex and Games Make Sexy Games~, there's a scene where you slip a laxative into a girl's coffee and convince her to wear a diaper as you go look for a bathroom, but deliberately lead her away from them until she messes her diaper. Pic related.
If you don't mind them being in Japanese, I know plenty of other ones.
I don't remember him posting muscular chicks or hypermess, but like I said, 91% or more of the art in these threads is western drawn, deal with it. Also, that's not irony. Irony would be getting banned for shitposting on a /d/iaper thread.
Still better than his awful image dumps that nobody wanted shitting up the threads, followed by him and newfags shitting them up even further with drama when told to stop.
He's a tripfag who started spamming pony pics in this thread just because someone said they didn't like it (and that's one of his lighter offenses compared to times like when he started an SJW shitstorm in a BDSM thread or spammed diaper yaoi in diaper girl threads just to be a contrarian twat). The brony asspain coming from him was palpable.
Also, while there are acceptable exceptions among western pics, awful art like what he tends to post is against the rules. Deal with it.
You are not talking about the same person. The pony dumper and the armchair theologian are two different posters.
Also, if I recall correctly, the AT asked several times if people had alternative requests. Don't complain if you said nothing.
>2006? nah, that's gotta have been around since 2001ish
It was 2000.
>It's like the wilhelm scream, only noticeable.
It takes you completely out of the scene and is distracting?
"Fun" trivia: If you want to know what BLART sounds like, watch the intro to "Family Double Dare." That's what I had in mind. http://youtu.be/K3ATB33O5r0?t=40s BLART is also inspired by MAD Magazine artist Don Martin, who was known for his weird sound effects.
RFSwitched's FLORBP sound is way the fuck better.
I can kind of hear it, but I mostly hear FLORBP in that sound effect as well. BLART always seemed like a sound effect for a bass-heavy alarm or horn.
I feel that there aren't a lot of great onomatopoeias out there though I understand that the subject matter makes it kind of hard to make decent sounding onomatopoeias. I feel like I'd have to brainstorm for a very long time to find a good one to use.
Now that I see the image in my post, that reminds me. Kiru, are you still around?
I'm not asking for anything special. I kind of remember you mentioning you were going to draw often for the threads, if I'm correct, of course.
If I remember correctly, the IQ distribution for those with Asperger's is approximately the same as that of the general population.
With legitimate IQ tests, there are scores for a variety of things. Social skills is one of them and that can bring down the composite average score. I had one when I was like 12 and the testing was for hours on several different days and I scored about 126 and probably would've gotten a higher score, but there were some parts I just didn't take very seriously
>I feel like I'd have to brainstorm for a very long time to find a good one to use.
Honest question, do people still like sound effects in general? Obviously not BLART.
Probably not, unless one were to manufacture the sound in a program of some kind. I think it's better to leave it blank and let the viewer create their own ideal sounds in their head. Show everything through expression and leave the rest to the viewer.
>I'm also currently doing a cyoa there
Which one, anon, if you don't mind me asking? If the other ones are dead dead, I'd like to know which one has higher chances of getting replies to.
Trapped in the Home of Tomorrow. Yeah, i know it isn't anything original or great but i really like the concept and wanted to do something with it. Anyway, i should have an update out soon. Also, i think the other cyoa writers might appreciate it if you replied in their threads even if their currently dead as it might motivate them to do more updates. That is if you like them and you have the time.
>tfw one of the best game shows is never coming back
It used to be James Ruglia, until the guy realized that maybe tacking his real name onto diaper art is probably a bad idea.
Didn't help that the default character in Final Fantasy Proxii (or proxii rapture, now) was named james ruglia.
>check out LAFWIRM out of bordeom
>little pensive since it runs on fucking rpgmaker 2003
>kind of slow going
>check out all the accident messages, not bad but like all these games thats probably it
>game progresses and jodie begins regressing
>the accident messages all completely changed
>they keep changing as the game progresses instead of using stock ones
>its basically hitting everything i love about this fetish
>like two hours later
>shit starts getting reaaaaallly good
>end of demo, next update has no ETA and its been months. fug.
>crack open code and see theres a bunch of accident messages for a diff character i didnt even know you could get in your party and a ton of other shit
never did i expect to see so much effort put into a fetish game goddamn everyone should fuckin play this shit i dont care that im late to the party it rules.
out of all the weird drawings I've seen having to do with a diaper fetish the one with game of thrones is crazy? ridonkulous sir!
I recently played through this since it was mentioned in the thread, was pretty good. Dunno how you get Kara in your party though since looking at the events you apparently can play as her and her brother? Curious to if that's a branch you can go on or if that's just groundwork the dude put in for later.
Not as crazy as "sunset found her squatting in the grass". Just imagine, if Daenerys wore diapers, she wouldn't have required that diversion, and she'd probably already have made it to and conquered Westeros.
The game is really nice. For the guy asking how to get Kara into your party, you either would get her in your party at a time after the current demo is over (you go look for her and you'd go find her and such), or, you could always save her from pissing herself (that isn't any fun, though) and then she'll go with you to search for Caleb. I prefer to "get" Jodie (this is like a dating sim in that respect, you're going to have a relationship with one of the girls at some point) and I think you need to wait until much later to "get" another one of the girls. I know there's also a part where you can get drunk with Taryn in the demo but I haven't seen it.
Aww... I hope I didn't miss the Sakura Oogami diaper picture I requested for lulz
Anyone know what happened to Goodtimes' Ma/d/ World stories?
Are you me? I got the same test with the same result at the same age and I didn't take it seriously either.
I still don't get why they banned the religious theory dude. Leftism was trying to start shit about me hating Muslims so I can kind of see it but the other guy did nothing wrong.
I think the two issues are:
1. We have content makers but most "consumers" would rather hang out in here if they are anons or at some other popular discussion site if they are not. A diaper chan is kind of in an odd place between disposable (no pun intended) anonymity and a pseudonymous community.
2. The website has very limited features. Putting you back to the index after each post is really annoying, as is the lack of reply indicators to check your replies.
Well the way I see it, what sort of niche would diaperchan fill? As it is, people tried out omuchan, didn't like omuchan, badmouthed omuchan and let it rot in obscurity until mr october ripped off his diaper, stopped hosting the site and peaced the fuck out. From that little history I could see that there is little room for discussion within a dedicated board and would best be used as a gallery page.
So if someone wants diaperchan to be used, fill it with content. You'll attract the lurkers but don't expect it to be bustling with activities because lurkers tend to leave things alone.
Well, I think it ultimately depends on what context the artist drew it in, but I doubt a diaper fetish artist would draw something so controversial. (yes, I understand the irony) So, I fap away.
I don't think they used shock collars back then. They probably would have if invisible fences were invented, but they were too busy trying to figure out how they made those invisible railroads.
Derailing the thread by posting diaper images? I told you guys, it was the hums fluttershy image. Global Rule 15 apparently applies to humanized ponies.
But don't worry they'll be back tomorrow when the ban expires
No, I'm the person who has made a few posts expressing that I'm going to be a guy's live-in soon.
It was funny at the vocabulary section of the test because my mom was watching and she later said that she didn't know some of those words.
We are pass the bump limit, blam those faggots who post text without pictures.
Better make a new thread.
Well what the hell is the actual name? No one has any idea of what to google.
I don't know how people couldn't deduce this.